The Relationship Between Attachment Styles, Defense Mechanisms and Substance Use Disorder

Maedeh Kamrani, Zohre Rouhbakhsh, Ghazal Behravan, Razie Salehabadi
{"title":"The Relationship Between Attachment Styles, Defense Mechanisms and Substance Use Disorder","authors":"Maedeh Kamrani, Zohre Rouhbakhsh, Ghazal Behravan, Razie Salehabadi","doi":"10.5812/ijhrba-137086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Substance use disorder (SUD) is a global phenomenon that can negatively impact various aspects of an affected individual’s life. A thorough knowledge of the etiology of this disorder and its contributing factors can help us manage and prevent it more effectively. Objectives: In this research, we aimed to investigate the possible association between substance use disorder, attachment styles, and defense mechanisms. Patients and Methods: This case-control study was conducted on 120 participants divided into two groups; a group of 60 subjects diagnosed with substance use disorder and 60 participants without substance use disorder. The participants were evaluated using the Revised Collins, the Read Adult Attachment Scale, the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40), and a checklist consisting of questions regarding age, sex, marital status, job, income, level of education, and history of psychiatric illnesses. Data were gathered and analyzed using SPSS v. 26 software. Results: Neurotic defense mechanisms were significantly higher in the SUD group than in non-SUD participants (P-value = 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding mature and immature defense mechanisms (P-value > 0.05). Anxious and avoidant attachment styles were significantly more common in the SUD patients compared to the control group (P-value = 0.001 and 0.0001, respectively). Secure attachment style was significantly more common in the non-SUD group (P-value = 0.002). Marital status was associated with attachment style (P-value < 0.05). The probability of having an anxious attachment style for unmarried people was 4.5 times higher than for married people. Other variables had no significant relationship with any attachment style types. Conclusions: These findings suggest a higher prevalence of neurotic defense mechanisms and avoidant and anxious attachment styles in people suffering from substance use disorder. These findings, if proven, can help plan more effective psychological treatments for SUD patients and preventive measures to reduce the prevalence and burden of this disorder.","PeriodicalId":53452,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijhrba-137086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Substance use disorder (SUD) is a global phenomenon that can negatively impact various aspects of an affected individual’s life. A thorough knowledge of the etiology of this disorder and its contributing factors can help us manage and prevent it more effectively. Objectives: In this research, we aimed to investigate the possible association between substance use disorder, attachment styles, and defense mechanisms. Patients and Methods: This case-control study was conducted on 120 participants divided into two groups; a group of 60 subjects diagnosed with substance use disorder and 60 participants without substance use disorder. The participants were evaluated using the Revised Collins, the Read Adult Attachment Scale, the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40), and a checklist consisting of questions regarding age, sex, marital status, job, income, level of education, and history of psychiatric illnesses. Data were gathered and analyzed using SPSS v. 26 software. Results: Neurotic defense mechanisms were significantly higher in the SUD group than in non-SUD participants (P-value = 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding mature and immature defense mechanisms (P-value > 0.05). Anxious and avoidant attachment styles were significantly more common in the SUD patients compared to the control group (P-value = 0.001 and 0.0001, respectively). Secure attachment style was significantly more common in the non-SUD group (P-value = 0.002). Marital status was associated with attachment style (P-value < 0.05). The probability of having an anxious attachment style for unmarried people was 4.5 times higher than for married people. Other variables had no significant relationship with any attachment style types. Conclusions: These findings suggest a higher prevalence of neurotic defense mechanisms and avoidant and anxious attachment styles in people suffering from substance use disorder. These findings, if proven, can help plan more effective psychological treatments for SUD patients and preventive measures to reduce the prevalence and burden of this disorder.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
依恋类型、防卫机制与物质使用障碍的关系
背景:物质使用障碍(SUD)是一种全球性现象,会对受影响个体生活的各个方面产生负面影响。全面了解这种疾病的病因及其影响因素可以帮助我们更有效地管理和预防它。目的:在本研究中,我们旨在探讨物质使用障碍、依恋类型和防御机制之间的可能联系。患者和方法:本病例对照研究共120例,分为两组;一组60名被诊断为物质使用障碍的受试者和60名没有物质使用障碍的受试者。研究人员使用修订的柯林斯量表、里德成人依恋量表、防卫风格问卷(DSQ-40)以及包括年龄、性别、婚姻状况、工作、收入、教育程度和精神疾病史等问题的检查表对参与者进行评估。采用SPSS v. 26软件进行数据收集和分析。结果:SUD组的神经防御机制明显高于非SUD组(p值= 0.001)。两组在成熟和不成熟防御机制方面无显著差异(p值>0.05)。与对照组相比,焦虑型和回避型依恋类型在SUD患者中更为常见(p值分别为0.001和0.0001)。安全依恋类型在非sud组中更为常见(p值= 0.002)。婚姻状况与依恋类型相关(p值<0.05)。未婚人士产生焦虑型依恋的可能性是已婚人士的4.5倍。其他变量与任何依恋类型没有显著关系。结论:这些研究结果表明,在物质使用障碍患者中,神经性防御机制、回避型和焦虑型依恋类型的患病率较高。如果这些发现得到证实,将有助于为SUD患者制定更有效的心理治疗和预防措施,以减少这种疾病的患病率和负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction is a clinical journal which is informative to all fields related to the high risk behaviors, addiction, including smoking, alcohol consumption and substance abuse, unsafe sexual behavior, obesity and unhealthy eating habits, physical inactivity, and violence, suicidal behavior, and self-injurious behaviors. International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction is an authentic clinical journal which its content is devoted to the particular compilation of the latest worldwide and interdisciplinary approach and findings including original manuscripts, meta-analyses and reviews, health economic papers, debates, and consensus statements of the clinical relevance of Risky behaviors and addiction. In addition, consensus evidential reports not only highlight the new observations, original research and results accompanied by innovative treatments and all the other relevant topics but also include highlighting disease mechanisms or important clinical observations and letters on articles published in this journal.
期刊最新文献
A Comprehensive Analysis of Spiritual Interventions in the Prevention and Management of Student Suicide Antibiotic-Seeking Behavior in Toothache Efficacy of Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy (IPSRT) on Emotion Regulation, Addiction Severity, and Craving in Methamphetamine Abusers Emotion Evoking Game Design: Evaluating Induced Emotions Among Individuals with Healthy, Problematic, and Disordered Gaming MRNA Expression of Dopamine Receptors in Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes of Social Networking Sites (SNS) Addicts: A Case-control Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1