E. A. Shmeleva, P. A. Kislyakov, I.-L. S. Meyerson, T. K. Phan
{"title":"Influence of academic-professional hardiness on the subjective well-being of students in socionomic professions","authors":"E. A. Shmeleva, P. A. Kislyakov, I.-L. S. Meyerson, T. K. Phan","doi":"10.17853/1994-5639-2023-9-118-155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction . Professions such as doctors, teachers, psychologists, and social workers entail a certain risk to the psychological well-being of both professionals and students due to their educational and professional activities. Aim. The present study aims to explore the factors, which contribute to the development of resilience skills in students of socionomic professions, and which could ensure their psychological well-being in relation to their future professional activities. Methodology and research methods. The theoretical foundations of resilience theory by S. Maddi, D. A. Leontiev, E. I. Rasskazova and others served as subject-scientific guidelines, as well as the approaches of positive psychology to studying subjective well-being of individuals (K. Rogers, M. Seligman). Psychodiagnostic methods such as “Academical-Professional Hardiness”, “Subjective Well-Being Scale”, and “Coping with Stress Questionnaire” (COPE) were employed. The collected data were processed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, regression analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. Research participants. The sample consisted of students majoring in pedagogy, psychology, medicine, and social sciences. The total number of participants was 282, ranging in age from 18 to 20 years old. Results and scientific novelty. The results allow refining knowledge about the characteristics of psychological factors, which contribute to the subjective well-being of students in helping professions. It has been found that the main predictors of subjective well-being among students in socionomic fields of study are academic and professional hardiness, as well as constructive coping styles in dealing with difficulties. Additionally, differentiation in the choice of dominant constructive coping strategies has been observed among students from different academic fields. Practical significance. The obtained results allow refining the understanding of educational and professional resilience as a predictor of students’ psychological well-being in helping professions through productive coping styles, as well as outlining approaches to developing and implementing programmes for enhancing academic and professional hardiness among students in socionomic fields of education (such as pedagogy and education, psychology, social work, medicine). The theoretical and empirical findings of this research can be useful in designing lessons on psychological disciplines.","PeriodicalId":44143,"journal":{"name":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","volume":"104 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-9-118-155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction . Professions such as doctors, teachers, psychologists, and social workers entail a certain risk to the psychological well-being of both professionals and students due to their educational and professional activities. Aim. The present study aims to explore the factors, which contribute to the development of resilience skills in students of socionomic professions, and which could ensure their psychological well-being in relation to their future professional activities. Methodology and research methods. The theoretical foundations of resilience theory by S. Maddi, D. A. Leontiev, E. I. Rasskazova and others served as subject-scientific guidelines, as well as the approaches of positive psychology to studying subjective well-being of individuals (K. Rogers, M. Seligman). Psychodiagnostic methods such as “Academical-Professional Hardiness”, “Subjective Well-Being Scale”, and “Coping with Stress Questionnaire” (COPE) were employed. The collected data were processed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, regression analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. Research participants. The sample consisted of students majoring in pedagogy, psychology, medicine, and social sciences. The total number of participants was 282, ranging in age from 18 to 20 years old. Results and scientific novelty. The results allow refining knowledge about the characteristics of psychological factors, which contribute to the subjective well-being of students in helping professions. It has been found that the main predictors of subjective well-being among students in socionomic fields of study are academic and professional hardiness, as well as constructive coping styles in dealing with difficulties. Additionally, differentiation in the choice of dominant constructive coping strategies has been observed among students from different academic fields. Practical significance. The obtained results allow refining the understanding of educational and professional resilience as a predictor of students’ psychological well-being in helping professions through productive coping styles, as well as outlining approaches to developing and implementing programmes for enhancing academic and professional hardiness among students in socionomic fields of education (such as pedagogy and education, psychology, social work, medicine). The theoretical and empirical findings of this research can be useful in designing lessons on psychological disciplines.
介绍。医生、教师、心理学家和社会工作者等职业由于其教育和专业活动,对专业人员和学生的心理健康都有一定的风险。的目标。本研究旨在探讨影响社会经济专业学生心理弹性技能发展的因素,以及在未来专业活动中心理健康的因素。方法论和研究方法。S. madi, D. A. Leontiev, E. I. Rasskazova等人的弹性理论基础是学科科学的指导方针,也是积极心理学研究个体主观幸福感的方法(K. Rogers, M. Seligman)。采用“学业-职业适应力”、“主观幸福感量表”和“应对压力问卷”等心理诊断方法。对收集的数据进行描述性统计、相关分析、回归分析和验证性因子分析。研究的参与者。样本包括教育学、心理学、医学和社会科学专业的学生。参与者总数为282人,年龄从18岁到20岁不等。结果与科学新颖性。本研究结果有助于我们进一步了解影响助人职业学生主观幸福感的心理因素特征。研究发现,社会经济学专业学生主观幸福感的主要预测因子是学业和职业适应力,以及在处理困难时的建设性应对方式。此外,不同学术领域的学生在选择优势建设性应对策略方面存在差异。现实意义。所获得的结果可以完善对教育和专业弹性的理解,将其作为学生心理健康的预测因素,通过富有成效的应对方式帮助专业人士,并概述了在教育的社会领域(如教育学和教育学、心理学、社会工作、医学)中制定和实施提高学生学术和专业适应性的方案的方法。本研究的理论和实证结果可为心理学科课程设计提供参考。