“I think”: integrating project-based learning and case study to teach fundamentals of evolutionary tree-thinking

Q1 Social Sciences Evolution: Education and Outreach Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1186/s12052-023-00192-8
Thomas J. Firneno, Gabrielle T. Welsh, Peter J. Nimlos, Erica L. Larson
{"title":"“I think”: integrating project-based learning and case study to teach fundamentals of evolutionary tree-thinking","authors":"Thomas J. Firneno, Gabrielle T. Welsh, Peter J. Nimlos, Erica L. Larson","doi":"10.1186/s12052-023-00192-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The theory and practice of evolutionary tree-thinking is pervasive through many scientific fields and is a critical component of biological literacy. Many elements of tree-thinking are introduced early in undergraduate biology education. However, basic concepts are often not revisited/reinforced and are assumed to have been fully conceptually grasped in upper-level courses and beyond. Here, we present a project-based activity that we developed to aid upper-level biology students to learn, conceptualize, and practice tree-thinking. This approach allows them to identify the misconceptions that they may have about tree-thinking, while reinforcing the theories and concepts that they may have encountered in introductory courses. It also integrates several pedagogical styles (instructor-led and student-centered), along with an organismal case study to make concepts concrete and realistic to students.","PeriodicalId":36959,"journal":{"name":"Evolution: Education and Outreach","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution: Education and Outreach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-023-00192-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The theory and practice of evolutionary tree-thinking is pervasive through many scientific fields and is a critical component of biological literacy. Many elements of tree-thinking are introduced early in undergraduate biology education. However, basic concepts are often not revisited/reinforced and are assumed to have been fully conceptually grasped in upper-level courses and beyond. Here, we present a project-based activity that we developed to aid upper-level biology students to learn, conceptualize, and practice tree-thinking. This approach allows them to identify the misconceptions that they may have about tree-thinking, while reinforcing the theories and concepts that they may have encountered in introductory courses. It also integrates several pedagogical styles (instructor-led and student-centered), along with an organismal case study to make concepts concrete and realistic to students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我认为”:结合基于项目的学习和案例研究,教授进化树思维的基础知识
进化树思维的理论和实践在许多科学领域普遍存在,是生物素养的重要组成部分。在本科生物教育中,早期就引入了树思维的许多要素。然而,基本概念往往不会被重新审视/强化,并被认为在高级课程或更高级别的课程中已经完全掌握了概念。在这里,我们提出了一个基于项目的活动,我们开发帮助高年级生物学生学习,概念化和练习树思维。这种方法使他们能够识别他们可能对树思维的误解,同时强化他们可能在入门课程中遇到的理论和概念。它还整合了几种教学风格(教师主导和学生为中心),以及一个有机的案例研究,使概念对学生具体和现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution: Education and Outreach
Evolution: Education and Outreach Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evolution content in school textbooks: data from eight European countries From conflict to harmony: changing conceptual ecology of evolution acceptance of muslim students after dialogue in science and religion The teaching of evolutionary theory and the Cosmos–Evidence–Ideas model Automated content analysis as a tool to compare content in sexual selection research with examples of sexual selection in evolutionary biology textbooks: implications for teaching the nature of science Comparing learning outcomes of two collaborative activities on random genetic drift in an upper-division genetics course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1