Informal third-party actors in street-level welfare decisions: a case study of Pakistan social assistance

IF 2.6 3区 社会学 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Journal of Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1017/s0047279423000405
Aniqa Farwa, Paul Henman
{"title":"Informal third-party actors in street-level welfare decisions: a case study of Pakistan social assistance","authors":"Aniqa Farwa, Paul Henman","doi":"10.1017/s0047279423000405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research on street-level bureaucracy has tended to focus on individual and organisational factors that influence street-level practice. To date, empirical research has insufficiently explored the contribution of wider socio-cultural factors in street-level decision making. Drawing on data from a qualitative study of social assistance in Pakistan, this article examines how cultural patronage practices of sifarish intersect with street-level social welfare operations. Results highlight the importance of sifarish in informing decision-making processes and in enabling access to social assistance. In this manner, people providing sifarish (called sifarishie ) operate as informal third-party actors. The findings challenge the dominant view of street-level operation that the decision making at street level is solely guided by individual and organisational factors.","PeriodicalId":51438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Policy","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279423000405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Research on street-level bureaucracy has tended to focus on individual and organisational factors that influence street-level practice. To date, empirical research has insufficiently explored the contribution of wider socio-cultural factors in street-level decision making. Drawing on data from a qualitative study of social assistance in Pakistan, this article examines how cultural patronage practices of sifarish intersect with street-level social welfare operations. Results highlight the importance of sifarish in informing decision-making processes and in enabling access to social assistance. In this manner, people providing sifarish (called sifarishie ) operate as informal third-party actors. The findings challenge the dominant view of street-level operation that the decision making at street level is solely guided by individual and organisational factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
街头福利决策中的非正式第三方行为者:巴基斯坦社会援助案例研究
对街头官僚主义的研究往往侧重于影响街头实践的个人和组织因素。迄今为止,实证研究还没有充分探讨更广泛的社会文化因素在街头决策中的贡献。根据巴基斯坦社会援助定性研究的数据,本文考察了西法利鱼的文化赞助实践如何与街头社会福利行动相交叉。结果强调了sifarish在为决策过程提供信息和使人们能够获得社会援助方面的重要性。以这种方式,提供sifarish(称为sifarishie)的人作为非正式的第三方参与者进行操作。调查结果挑战了街道层面的主导观点,即街道层面的决策完全受个人和组织因素的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Policy carries high quality articles on all aspects of social policy in an international context. It places particular emphasis upon articles which seek to contribute to debates on the future direction of social policy, to present new empirical data, to advance theories, or to analyse issues in the making and implementation of social policies. The Journal of Social Policy is part of the "Social Policy Package", which also includes Social Policy and Society and the Social Policy Digest. An online resource, the Social Policy Digest, was launched in 2003. The Digest provides a regularly up-dated, fully searchable, summary of policy developments and research findings across the whole range of social policy.
期刊最新文献
Adapting to an older workforce: health and the (non) response of employers in an era of insecurity Advancing a healthy housing policy agenda: how do policy makers problematise housing-related health issues? An intersectional feminist analysis of compulsory income management in Australia Did the COVID-19 pandemic fuel public support for social protection? Universal Credit: administrative burdens of automated welfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1