Evaluation of Higher Vocational English Curriculum Toward Enhanced Program Implementation

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Brock Education-A Journal of Educational Research and Practice Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI:10.54097/jeer.v5i1.11548
Qin Pan, Rizal O Dapat
{"title":"Evaluation of Higher Vocational English Curriculum Toward Enhanced Program Implementation","authors":"Qin Pan, Rizal O Dapat","doi":"10.54097/jeer.v5i1.11548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This descriptive-comparative research aims to examine the difficulties encountered by educators and students during the implementation of the English curriculum. This research examines the survey data collected from both instructors and students in order to get a thorough comprehension of the factors that impact curriculum delivery and learning experiences. The results of the study provide significant insights on the distribution of gender, age groups, teaching experience, student categories, and college affiliations. Prominent observations reveal significant disparities in perspectives between educators and students with regards to several aspects of the curriculum, such as its design, characteristics, objectives, material applicability, teaching methods, and assessment approaches. The findings of this study indicate that gender and categorization did not have a significant effect on the observed disparities. However, it was observed that college affiliation had a major role in influencing these discrepancies. Educators and students encounter a range of hurdles that include deficiencies in linguistic foundation, restrictions in vocabulary, complexity in grammar, difficulty in pronunciation, concerns with confidence and motivation, impediments in independent learning, and the significance of cross-cultural understanding. The implications derived from the results underscore the need for enhanced cooperation and communication between educators and learners. This research highlights the need of developing flexible courses that accommodate the varied interests and requirements of students. This research offers a comprehensive examination of the intricacies involved in the implementation of English curriculum in Chinese educational contexts. Moreover, it puts forward practical suggestions for improving the quality of teaching and learning in these settings.","PeriodicalId":42675,"journal":{"name":"Brock Education-A Journal of Educational Research and Practice","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brock Education-A Journal of Educational Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54097/jeer.v5i1.11548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This descriptive-comparative research aims to examine the difficulties encountered by educators and students during the implementation of the English curriculum. This research examines the survey data collected from both instructors and students in order to get a thorough comprehension of the factors that impact curriculum delivery and learning experiences. The results of the study provide significant insights on the distribution of gender, age groups, teaching experience, student categories, and college affiliations. Prominent observations reveal significant disparities in perspectives between educators and students with regards to several aspects of the curriculum, such as its design, characteristics, objectives, material applicability, teaching methods, and assessment approaches. The findings of this study indicate that gender and categorization did not have a significant effect on the observed disparities. However, it was observed that college affiliation had a major role in influencing these discrepancies. Educators and students encounter a range of hurdles that include deficiencies in linguistic foundation, restrictions in vocabulary, complexity in grammar, difficulty in pronunciation, concerns with confidence and motivation, impediments in independent learning, and the significance of cross-cultural understanding. The implications derived from the results underscore the need for enhanced cooperation and communication between educators and learners. This research highlights the need of developing flexible courses that accommodate the varied interests and requirements of students. This research offers a comprehensive examination of the intricacies involved in the implementation of English curriculum in Chinese educational contexts. Moreover, it puts forward practical suggestions for improving the quality of teaching and learning in these settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高职英语课程实施强化评价
本研究旨在探讨教师和学生在实施英语课程时所遇到的困难。本研究从教师和学生两方面收集调查数据,以全面了解影响课程交付和学习体验的因素。研究结果对性别、年龄、教学经验、学生类别和大学隶属关系的分布提供了重要的见解。突出的观察揭示了教育工作者和学生在课程设计、特征、目标、材料适用性、教学方法和评估方法等几个方面的观点存在显著差异。本研究的结果表明,性别和分类对观察到的差异没有显著影响。然而,据观察,大学隶属关系在影响这些差异方面发挥了主要作用。教育工作者和学生都会遇到一系列障碍,包括语言基础的不足、词汇的限制、语法的复杂性、发音的困难、对自信和动力的担忧、自主学习的障碍以及跨文化理解的重要性。从研究结果中得出的启示强调了教育者和学习者之间加强合作和交流的必要性。这项研究强调需要开发灵活的课程,以适应学生的不同兴趣和要求。本研究对中国教育背景下英语课程实施的复杂性进行了全面考察。并提出了切实可行的建议,以提高这些环境下的教与学质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Results of a One-Day Seminar on Preservice Teachers’ Incorporation of the UDL Framework in Lesson Design Soft Skills Don’t Have To Be Hard: Embedding Soft Skills Instruction in Moroccan Secondary Schools Under the Background of Industry-Education Integration--Real-Time Environmental Inspection--Exploration and Practice of Teaching Mode Research on the relationship between college students' learning autonomy, psychological needs, and self-control Feasibility analysis of children's game picture book creation in ancient Chinese paintings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1