Ouhao Chen, Endah Retnowati, BoBo Kai Yin Chan, Slava Kalyuga
{"title":"The effect of worked examples on learning solution steps and knowledge transfer","authors":"Ouhao Chen, Endah Retnowati, BoBo Kai Yin Chan, Slava Kalyuga","doi":"10.1080/01443410.2023.2273762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe worked example effect has been well documented within the framework of Cognitive Load Theory (CLT), which suggests that teaching with examples would be superior to engaging in unguided problem solving, particularly for novices, as using worked examples would reduce their cognitive load, compared to solving problems, thus facilitating knowledge retention. This paper, using multiple-step mathematics problems, reports an experiment investigating the micro level of the worked example effect on learning solution steps, from the perspective of cognitive load and challenge (as a relevant affective, motivational factor), testing the worked example effect with a transfer test. The results favoured worked examples on both the retention and transfer tests after learning and showed that using worked examples would reduce cognitive load and impose less challenge on each step during learning.Keywords: Cognitive load theoryworked example effectcognitive load and challengesolution stepsretention and transfer tests Authors contributionsOuhao Chen: conceptualisation, research design, data analysis and writingEndah Retnowati: data collection and research designBoBo Kai Yin Chan: data analysisSlava Kalyuga: conceptualisation and writingDisclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis collaborative research is funded by Leverhulme Visiting Professor grant (VP2-2021-006) of Leverhulme Trust to the first author and last author.","PeriodicalId":48053,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2273762","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractThe worked example effect has been well documented within the framework of Cognitive Load Theory (CLT), which suggests that teaching with examples would be superior to engaging in unguided problem solving, particularly for novices, as using worked examples would reduce their cognitive load, compared to solving problems, thus facilitating knowledge retention. This paper, using multiple-step mathematics problems, reports an experiment investigating the micro level of the worked example effect on learning solution steps, from the perspective of cognitive load and challenge (as a relevant affective, motivational factor), testing the worked example effect with a transfer test. The results favoured worked examples on both the retention and transfer tests after learning and showed that using worked examples would reduce cognitive load and impose less challenge on each step during learning.Keywords: Cognitive load theoryworked example effectcognitive load and challengesolution stepsretention and transfer tests Authors contributionsOuhao Chen: conceptualisation, research design, data analysis and writingEndah Retnowati: data collection and research designBoBo Kai Yin Chan: data analysisSlava Kalyuga: conceptualisation and writingDisclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis collaborative research is funded by Leverhulme Visiting Professor grant (VP2-2021-006) of Leverhulme Trust to the first author and last author.
期刊介绍:
This journal provides an international forum for the discussion and rapid dissemination of research findings in psychology relevant to education. The journal places particular emphasis on the publishing of papers reporting applied research based on experimental and behavioural studies. Reviews of relevant areas of literature also appear from time to time. The aim of the journal is to be a primary source for articles dealing with the psychological aspects of education ranging from pre-school to tertiary provision and the education of children with special needs. The prompt publication of high-quality articles is the journal"s first priority. All contributions are submitted "blind" to at least two independent referees before acceptance for publication.