Does enabling control systems and relational capabilities foster conflict management in innovation ecosystems?

IF 3.6 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1108/jbim-05-2022-0213
Thiago Tomaz Luiz, Anderson Betti Frare, Ilse Maria Beuren
{"title":"Does enabling control systems and relational capabilities foster conflict management in innovation ecosystems?","authors":"Thiago Tomaz Luiz, Anderson Betti Frare, Ilse Maria Beuren","doi":"10.1108/jbim-05-2022-0213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper aims to analyze the effects of enabling management control systems (MCSs) and relational capabilities (interorganizational learning and coordination) on conflict management in innovation ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach Shedding light on relational governance, structural equation modeling (symmetric analysis) and qualitative comparative fuzzy-set analysis (asymmetric analysis) were applied to a sample of 164 Brazilian firms associated with science and technology parks (STPs), a specific type of innovation ecosystem. Findings The results of the symmetric analysis showed that enabling MCSs have a direct and positive effect on conflict management, as well indirect effects through interorganizational learning and coordination. The results of the asymmetric analysis indicated four solutions to promote high levels of conflict management, with enabling MCS solutions standing out, as they are present in the majority of cases in the sample. Originality/value Interorganizational conflict in innovation ecosystems are inevitable, but the previous literature is inconclusive about how the interrelation between MCS and relational capabilities can foster the management of these conflicts. By providing evidence on the predictors and solutions that lead to high levels of conflict management, this study presents valuable insights into how firms and STPs can mutually promote organizational and relational benefits throughout the innovation activities developed among those involved in innovation ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":48181,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-05-2022-0213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to analyze the effects of enabling management control systems (MCSs) and relational capabilities (interorganizational learning and coordination) on conflict management in innovation ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach Shedding light on relational governance, structural equation modeling (symmetric analysis) and qualitative comparative fuzzy-set analysis (asymmetric analysis) were applied to a sample of 164 Brazilian firms associated with science and technology parks (STPs), a specific type of innovation ecosystem. Findings The results of the symmetric analysis showed that enabling MCSs have a direct and positive effect on conflict management, as well indirect effects through interorganizational learning and coordination. The results of the asymmetric analysis indicated four solutions to promote high levels of conflict management, with enabling MCS solutions standing out, as they are present in the majority of cases in the sample. Originality/value Interorganizational conflict in innovation ecosystems are inevitable, but the previous literature is inconclusive about how the interrelation between MCS and relational capabilities can foster the management of these conflicts. By providing evidence on the predictors and solutions that lead to high levels of conflict management, this study presents valuable insights into how firms and STPs can mutually promote organizational and relational benefits throughout the innovation activities developed among those involved in innovation ecosystems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
启用控制系统和关系能力是否促进了创新生态系统中的冲突管理?
本文旨在分析管理控制系统(mcs)和相关能力(组织间学习和协调)对创新生态系统中冲突管理的影响。为了阐明关系治理,我们将结构方程建模(对称分析)和定性比较模糊集分析(不对称分析)应用于164家与科技园区(STPs)相关的巴西公司样本,这是一种特定类型的创新生态系统。发现对称分析结果表明,支持型MCSs对冲突管理具有直接和积极的影响,并通过组织间学习和协调产生间接影响。不对称分析的结果指出了促进高水平冲突管理的四种解决方案,使MCS解决方案脱颖而出,因为它们在样本中的大多数情况下都存在。创新生态系统中的组织间冲突是不可避免的,但以往的文献对MCS和关系能力之间的相互关系如何促进这些冲突的管理尚无定论。通过提供导致高水平冲突管理的预测因素和解决方案的证据,本研究为企业和stp如何在创新生态系统中参与的创新活动中相互促进组织和关系利益提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
25.80%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing (JBIM) publishes research on new ideas concerning business-to-business marketing, that is, how one company or organization markets its goods/services/ideas to another company or organization. It is a valuable source for academics, directors and executives of marketing, providing them with new, fresh insights which are applicable within real life settings. JBIM''s emphasis on insistence of proof is one of the cornerstones of its success and its reputation. Contributors to the journal must not only present new theories or ideas, but also back them up with research. In the process, many myths are exploded, philosophies reinvented and the scene set for topical debate on critical issues in B2B marketing. The B2B landscape evolves and so does the research that explores the emerging features and properties of B2B markets. From 2019 the journal hosts the IMP Forum that invites research advancing the boundaries of B2B marketing. Prior research has evidenced that interactivity and interdependences characterize interorganizational business relationships. The Forum aims to bring out research that explores interactivity and interdependences in business relationships and their implications for marketing management, business development and for society at large. Coverage: -Competition and cooperation- Networks in business markets- Buyer behaviour – purchasing and supply management- Managing product offerings- New product development and innovation- Networks in business markets- Distribution and routes to market- Market and customer communication - Customer relationship management- Sales and key account management- Organizing for global markets -
期刊最新文献
The effect of standardized advertising, managerial ties and born global orientation on export performance The effects of the functional and geographical breadth of collaborations on radical innovation performance: the moderating role of firm size Toward a sustainable future: integrating circular economy in the digitally advanced supply chain Third actor introductions to interaction episodes aiming at fast-forwarding new firm relationship development Information sharing in a green supply chain: a bane or a boon?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1