The effects of the functional and geographical breadth of collaborations on radical innovation performance: the moderating role of firm size

IF 3.6 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1108/jbim-01-2024-0011
Anna Izotova, María Teresa Bolívar-Ramos
{"title":"The effects of the functional and geographical breadth of collaborations on radical innovation performance: the moderating role of firm size","authors":"Anna Izotova, María Teresa Bolívar-Ramos","doi":"10.1108/jbim-01-2024-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Due to the constantly increasing competitiveness along with the complexity of knowledge, firms perceive collaboration as a key strategy that preserves firms' radical innovation performance. In this context, this paper aims to examine how firms’ partners’ diversity in open innovation activities influences the development of radical innovations, critical for social development. In particular, this study analyzes how the functional and geographical breadth of the firm’s collaboration portfolio affects its radical innovation performance. Furthermore, it also explores the role of firm size as a moderator in the relationships proposed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This research employs panel data analysis, using a sample of 4,677 Spanish firms, with data sourced from the PITEC database.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results of this study show that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the functional and the geographical breadth of collaborations and the firms’ radical innovation performance. Moreover, this study finds partial support for the moderating role of firm size, in the sense that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large firms vary in their optimal number of diversity of partners.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research provides a better understanding on how partners’ functional and geographical diversity, along with organizational characteristics such as firm size, affect how firms benefit from collaboration for innovation. This study shows that both SMEs and large firms experience diminishing returns when their collaboration networks become overly diverse in pursuit of radical innovation, due to increased costs. However, in SMEs, the turning point occurs at a later stage, consistent with the idea that small firms need broader functional networks to access complementary and novel resources they usually lack.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48181,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-01-2024-0011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Due to the constantly increasing competitiveness along with the complexity of knowledge, firms perceive collaboration as a key strategy that preserves firms' radical innovation performance. In this context, this paper aims to examine how firms’ partners’ diversity in open innovation activities influences the development of radical innovations, critical for social development. In particular, this study analyzes how the functional and geographical breadth of the firm’s collaboration portfolio affects its radical innovation performance. Furthermore, it also explores the role of firm size as a moderator in the relationships proposed.

Design/methodology/approach

This research employs panel data analysis, using a sample of 4,677 Spanish firms, with data sourced from the PITEC database.

Findings

The results of this study show that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the functional and the geographical breadth of collaborations and the firms’ radical innovation performance. Moreover, this study finds partial support for the moderating role of firm size, in the sense that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large firms vary in their optimal number of diversity of partners.

Originality/value

This research provides a better understanding on how partners’ functional and geographical diversity, along with organizational characteristics such as firm size, affect how firms benefit from collaboration for innovation. This study shows that both SMEs and large firms experience diminishing returns when their collaboration networks become overly diverse in pursuit of radical innovation, due to increased costs. However, in SMEs, the turning point occurs at a later stage, consistent with the idea that small firms need broader functional networks to access complementary and novel resources they usually lack.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合作的功能和地域广度对激进创新绩效的影响:公司规模的调节作用
目的由于竞争力的不断增强以及知识的复杂性,企业将合作视为保持企业激进创新绩效的关键战略。在此背景下,本文旨在研究企业合作伙伴在开放式创新活动中的多样性如何影响对社会发展至关重要的激进创新的发展。特别是,本研究分析了企业合作组合的功能和地域广度如何影响其激进创新绩效。研究结果研究结果表明,合作的功能和地域广度与企业的激进创新绩效之间存在倒 U 型关系。此外,本研究还部分支持企业规模的调节作用,即中小型企业(SMEs)和大型企业在合作伙伴的最佳多样性数量上存在差异。 原创性/价值本研究有助于更好地理解合作伙伴的功能和地域多样性以及企业规模等组织特征如何影响企业从创新合作中获益。本研究表明,当中小型企业和大型企业在追求激进创新的过程中合作网络过度多样化时,由于成本增加,双方的收益都会递减。然而,中小型企业的转折点出现在后期阶段,这与小企业需要更广泛的功能性网络来获取它们通常缺乏的互补性新资源的观点一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
25.80%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing (JBIM) publishes research on new ideas concerning business-to-business marketing, that is, how one company or organization markets its goods/services/ideas to another company or organization. It is a valuable source for academics, directors and executives of marketing, providing them with new, fresh insights which are applicable within real life settings. JBIM''s emphasis on insistence of proof is one of the cornerstones of its success and its reputation. Contributors to the journal must not only present new theories or ideas, but also back them up with research. In the process, many myths are exploded, philosophies reinvented and the scene set for topical debate on critical issues in B2B marketing. The B2B landscape evolves and so does the research that explores the emerging features and properties of B2B markets. From 2019 the journal hosts the IMP Forum that invites research advancing the boundaries of B2B marketing. Prior research has evidenced that interactivity and interdependences characterize interorganizational business relationships. The Forum aims to bring out research that explores interactivity and interdependences in business relationships and their implications for marketing management, business development and for society at large. Coverage: -Competition and cooperation- Networks in business markets- Buyer behaviour – purchasing and supply management- Managing product offerings- New product development and innovation- Networks in business markets- Distribution and routes to market- Market and customer communication - Customer relationship management- Sales and key account management- Organizing for global markets -
期刊最新文献
The effects of the functional and geographical breadth of collaborations on radical innovation performance: the moderating role of firm size Toward a sustainable future: integrating circular economy in the digitally advanced supply chain Third actor introductions to interaction episodes aiming at fast-forwarding new firm relationship development Information sharing in a green supply chain: a bane or a boon? Digital transformation and sustainable performance: the mediating role of triple-A supply chain capabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1