Co-design in the context of universal design: An Australian case study exploring the role of people with disabilities in the design of public buildings

IF 0.8 4区 艺术学 0 ART Design Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1080/14606925.2023.2264652
Valerie Watchorn, Richard Tucker, Danielle Hitch, Patsie Frawley
{"title":"Co-design in the context of universal design: An Australian case study exploring the role of people with disabilities in the design of public buildings","authors":"Valerie Watchorn, Richard Tucker, Danielle Hitch, Patsie Frawley","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2023.2264652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractUniversal design aims to maximise usability for all, and to achieve this participation of people with disabilities in design processes is essential. However, it is unknown how universal design and co-design, as a means of participatory design, can be applied to the architectural design of public buildings. This study aimed to explore stakeholder perceptions and experiences on this topic. As a qualitative study, three workshops were held with 26 people with disabilities, advocates, and design professionals. A phenomenological approach to data analysis was employed. Four major themes emerged: there are challenges to practicing co-design; co-design is inclusive, accessible, and genuine; co-design is planned and embedded in all design stages; and co-design delivers positive outcomes. Findings strongly support participation of people with disabilities in architectural design, highlight challenges and limitations to current practice, and provide insight into factors that optimise outcomes and the experiences of those involved.Keywords: Co-designuniversal designdisabilityarchitecturepublic buildingsparticipatory design AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank all the individuals who generously gave their time and expertise to participate in workshops for this research project.Ethics statementThis study received ethics approval from Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (DUHREC) (Project ID: 2019-023). All data were collected, analysed, and stored in accordance with ethical guidelines for research involving human participants and all people who contributed to this study provided informed consent to participate.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":46826,"journal":{"name":"Design Journal","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2023.2264652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractUniversal design aims to maximise usability for all, and to achieve this participation of people with disabilities in design processes is essential. However, it is unknown how universal design and co-design, as a means of participatory design, can be applied to the architectural design of public buildings. This study aimed to explore stakeholder perceptions and experiences on this topic. As a qualitative study, three workshops were held with 26 people with disabilities, advocates, and design professionals. A phenomenological approach to data analysis was employed. Four major themes emerged: there are challenges to practicing co-design; co-design is inclusive, accessible, and genuine; co-design is planned and embedded in all design stages; and co-design delivers positive outcomes. Findings strongly support participation of people with disabilities in architectural design, highlight challenges and limitations to current practice, and provide insight into factors that optimise outcomes and the experiences of those involved.Keywords: Co-designuniversal designdisabilityarchitecturepublic buildingsparticipatory design AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank all the individuals who generously gave their time and expertise to participate in workshops for this research project.Ethics statementThis study received ethics approval from Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (DUHREC) (Project ID: 2019-023). All data were collected, analysed, and stored in accordance with ethical guidelines for research involving human participants and all people who contributed to this study provided informed consent to participate.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通用设计背景下的协同设计:一个澳大利亚的案例研究,探讨残疾人在公共建筑设计中的作用
摘要通用设计旨在最大限度地提高所有人的可用性,而实现残疾人参与设计过程是必不可少的。然而,如何将通用设计和协同设计作为一种参与式设计的手段应用到公共建筑的建筑设计中,还不得而知。本研究旨在探讨利益相关者对这一主题的看法和经验。作为一项定性研究,有26名残疾人、倡导者和设计专业人士参加了三个研讨会。采用现象学方法进行数据分析。出现了四个主要主题:实践协同设计存在挑战;共同设计是包容的、可接近的、真实的;协同设计被规划并嵌入到所有设计阶段;协同设计带来了积极的结果。研究结果强烈支持残疾人参与建筑设计,强调了当前实践的挑战和局限性,并提供了优化结果和参与者体验的因素。关键词:共同设计、通用设计、残障建筑、共和国建筑、参与式设计致谢作者感谢所有为本研究项目慷慨奉献时间和专业知识的个人。本研究获得迪肯大学人类研究伦理委员会(DUHREC)(项目ID: 2019-023)的伦理批准。所有数据的收集、分析和存储都符合涉及人类参与者的研究的伦理准则,所有参与本研究的人都提供了知情同意。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
68
期刊最新文献
Obstacles, Solutions and Creative Agencies: How Forces and Agencies Shape the Learning Process of Weaving Using actor–network theory to revisit the digitalized tool in social design Leading by design User-driven product development: Designed by, not designed for Co-design for active aging: An approach to stimulating creativity of the young elderly in urban China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1