Afri-Queer Fugitivity in African Cinema

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Glq-A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1215/10642684-10740451
Naminata Diabate
{"title":"Afri-Queer Fugitivity in African Cinema","authors":"Naminata Diabate","doi":"10.1215/10642684-10740451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Speaking of Queer African Cinema's scope, Lindsey Green-Simms declares that her book should not be read as definitive or encyclopedic. Rather, it should be seen as a useful set of readings and a model of reading for scholars, activists, and filmmakers. Independently of that claim, the insightful study in four chapters fulfills the encyclopedic (in its erudition) function in addition to accomplishing what the author set out to do. In its curation of queer cinematic texts from both francophone and anglophone Africa, the book not only brings to light a vibrant archive but also charts innovative reading praxes that may inspire other scholars.Primarily, Green-Simms sees her examination of avant-garde films, realist dramas, popular melodramas, occult films, and a music video as demonstrating that the types of resistance the texts restage “are always multilayered, always determined by a complex entanglement of racial, gendered, and sexual identities and national politics as well as by conventions of genre and format and modes of circulation” (9). This investment in reformulating resistance as multiple and sometimes conflicting takes seriously the queer cultural artifacts as well as the inspiriting and challenging material conditions that undergird their production, distribution, and enjoyment.As such, Queer African Cinema is a first. That firstness stems from Green-Simms's long-standing and serious engagement with the cinematic texts, their actors, producers, distributors, censors, audiences, festival organizers, activists, scholars, and sites of appearance. Her knowledge of the context, which stems from participating in conferences, attending film festivals, and interviewing different actors in numerous countries, is translated into a methodological approach—worth highlighting—that is illuminating yet subtle. For instance, complementing her formal analysis of the documentary Major! (dir. Annalise Ophelian, 2015) with the insights she gained from attending the first-ever Queer Kampala International Film Festival (QKIFF) in 2016, she shares, “When the credits rolled during the Kampala screening where I was present, there was a huge round of applause. There were a few audible ‘wows’ from the audience, and several members looked back at the screen, raised a fist, and echoed the film's call for resilience by claiming, loud enough for everyone to hear, ‘I'm still fucking here’ ” (165, my emphasis). This delicate yet notable phrase “where I was present” gives some credence to the author's experience while turning the text from mere ethnography to robust analysis. The author's experience serves equally as a forceful reminder that films are seen and engaged in the world, making the case, if need be, that formal analysis benefits from the live audience reaction, which is unmistakably mediated by the writer's biases and goals.The firstness that marks the publication of Queer African Cinema as a formative work reflects the status of most of its films, film festivals, scenes, and characters. For instance, Mohamed Camara's Dakan (1997), discussed in the book's introduction and the coda, was West Africa's first queer film and is often considered the first global African feature. Joseph Gai Ramaka's Karmen Gei (2001), one of the two works examined in chapter 1, was the first-ever depiction of African lesbian sex on screen, the first and only with an explicitly queer protagonist, and the first African adaptation of Prosper Mérimée's 1845 novella, Carmen, which George Bizet turned into an opera in 1875. Similarly, Ghanaian Socrates Safo's popular film Women in Love (1996), which gave birth to Jezebel (2007–8), the four-part Ghanaian video film also analyzed in chapter 1, was one of the first Black African films ever to depict lesbianism. Wanuri Kahiu's Rafiki (2018), a key text in chapter 4, is a first in two ways, as it is the first queer Kenyan film to be shown in Kenyan cinemas and the first Kenyan film ever to be screened at the Cannes Film Festival. Stories of Our Lives (dir. Jim Chuchu, 2014), which features prominently in the book's introduction, became the first East African queer film to screen at international film festivals. Turning to Nollywood in chapter 2, Green-Simms focuses on Walking with Shadows (dir. Aoife O'Kelly), an adaptation of Jude Dibia's novel of the same name that became the first Nigerian queer film to premiere internationally when it screened at the British Film Institute Film Festival in 2019. Lancelot Imasuen's Emotional Crack (2003)—another key text of the same chapter—was the first Nigerian film to make homosexuality central to its plot and to feature an actual relationship between a same-sex couple.In Queer African Cinema, the reader will enjoy an enlightening account of many first queer film festivals. These include the South African Out in Africa Film, discussed in chapter 3, which in 1994 became the first national and officially recognized queer film festival on the continent. Chapter 4 explores the east African context by way of two “first” festivals: the Nairobi Out Film Festival (OFF) that in 2011 was the first queer African film festival outside of South Africa and QKIFF in Kampala, inaugurated in 2016. These festivals were organized and films produced, circulated, and enjoyed amid germinal moments, notably 1994, which marked South Africa as the first country in the world to ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.In addition to its erudition in the domain of queer filmic texts, Queer African Cinemas offers readers numerous conceptual and analytical insights. An outstanding element of that conceptual repertoire and reading praxis is the cut that undergirds the notion of Afri-queer fugitivity, which is carefully demarcated from fugitivity as conceived in Black studies. Afri-queer fugitivity emerges from interpreting multiple films, but particularly chapter 1’s two films, Karmen Geï and Jezebel. Remakes of prior stories that feature eccentric iterations of the water spirit Mami Wata who engage in lesbianism, the films’ narratives offer in their form and in their improvisational jazz and drumming score the possibility of being read as cuts and breaks “that make waves in ways that are neither progressive nor regressive but that allow . . . for a particular emergence to occur” (71).Just as Green-Simms reformulates fugitivity, she also offers a robust examination of contemporary and perennial concepts, including resistance, resilience, hegemonic masculinity, fugitivity, waywardness, and fetishistic spectatorship. These terms get inflected, carrying nuances when confronted with African cultural productions and material contingencies. The idea of critical resilience in chapter 4, for instance, develops from Green-Simms's analyses of Rafiki, Art Attack's “Same Love (Remix)” music video, and queer art and activism within film festivals in Nairobi and Kampala. Investigating the struggles, triumphs, pains, and pleasures from these texts, Green-Simms surmises that critical resilience highlights two modes: a mode of championing “individual endurance, . . . in a way that also challenges neoliberal narratives by seeking to upend hierarchal organization and reimagine social life” and the mode of criticality, of dire necessity, and of resilience (171). This engagement shows the author's commendable knowledge of current concepts; however, her need to constantly reformulate them ends up framing the African context as fundamentally different from those from which the terms emerged.Similar to the films, characters, and storylines that make waves in Queer African Cinemas, the structure of the book is queer and wayward. Its organization is as intuitive with the geographic arrangement as it is queer with its content. Whereas two chapters deal with national contexts, Nigeria and South Africa, the two others examine two regions, West Africa and East Africa. Whereas wayward femininities and wounded masculinities occupy chapters 1 and 3, respectively, groundbreaking and broken film festivals, outrageous censorship boards, and triumphant filmmakers and audiences make up the content of chapters 2 and 4, demonstrating how modes of queer imaginative acts “are nonlinear and nondismissive” of pleasure and defeat (33).Written in clear prose and brilliantly self-reflexive in method, this sophisticated reading of queer cinematic texts deserves attention for the ways in which it converses with the most compelling scholars, thinkers, artists, and activists of queerness and gender in the generalized African context. The insights from Green-Simms's conversations with Keguro Macharia, Sylvia Tamale, Zethu Matebeni, Brenna Munro, George Barasa, Unoma Azuah, Stella Nyanzi, Dayon Monson, Beverley Ditsie, S. N. Nyeck, Binyavanga Wainaina, Ezekiel Mutua, Karl Schoonover, David Murray, and Neville Hoad make this book a must-read for those interested in queerness and film studies in Africa and beyond.","PeriodicalId":47296,"journal":{"name":"Glq-A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glq-A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-10740451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Speaking of Queer African Cinema's scope, Lindsey Green-Simms declares that her book should not be read as definitive or encyclopedic. Rather, it should be seen as a useful set of readings and a model of reading for scholars, activists, and filmmakers. Independently of that claim, the insightful study in four chapters fulfills the encyclopedic (in its erudition) function in addition to accomplishing what the author set out to do. In its curation of queer cinematic texts from both francophone and anglophone Africa, the book not only brings to light a vibrant archive but also charts innovative reading praxes that may inspire other scholars.Primarily, Green-Simms sees her examination of avant-garde films, realist dramas, popular melodramas, occult films, and a music video as demonstrating that the types of resistance the texts restage “are always multilayered, always determined by a complex entanglement of racial, gendered, and sexual identities and national politics as well as by conventions of genre and format and modes of circulation” (9). This investment in reformulating resistance as multiple and sometimes conflicting takes seriously the queer cultural artifacts as well as the inspiriting and challenging material conditions that undergird their production, distribution, and enjoyment.As such, Queer African Cinema is a first. That firstness stems from Green-Simms's long-standing and serious engagement with the cinematic texts, their actors, producers, distributors, censors, audiences, festival organizers, activists, scholars, and sites of appearance. Her knowledge of the context, which stems from participating in conferences, attending film festivals, and interviewing different actors in numerous countries, is translated into a methodological approach—worth highlighting—that is illuminating yet subtle. For instance, complementing her formal analysis of the documentary Major! (dir. Annalise Ophelian, 2015) with the insights she gained from attending the first-ever Queer Kampala International Film Festival (QKIFF) in 2016, she shares, “When the credits rolled during the Kampala screening where I was present, there was a huge round of applause. There were a few audible ‘wows’ from the audience, and several members looked back at the screen, raised a fist, and echoed the film's call for resilience by claiming, loud enough for everyone to hear, ‘I'm still fucking here’ ” (165, my emphasis). This delicate yet notable phrase “where I was present” gives some credence to the author's experience while turning the text from mere ethnography to robust analysis. The author's experience serves equally as a forceful reminder that films are seen and engaged in the world, making the case, if need be, that formal analysis benefits from the live audience reaction, which is unmistakably mediated by the writer's biases and goals.The firstness that marks the publication of Queer African Cinema as a formative work reflects the status of most of its films, film festivals, scenes, and characters. For instance, Mohamed Camara's Dakan (1997), discussed in the book's introduction and the coda, was West Africa's first queer film and is often considered the first global African feature. Joseph Gai Ramaka's Karmen Gei (2001), one of the two works examined in chapter 1, was the first-ever depiction of African lesbian sex on screen, the first and only with an explicitly queer protagonist, and the first African adaptation of Prosper Mérimée's 1845 novella, Carmen, which George Bizet turned into an opera in 1875. Similarly, Ghanaian Socrates Safo's popular film Women in Love (1996), which gave birth to Jezebel (2007–8), the four-part Ghanaian video film also analyzed in chapter 1, was one of the first Black African films ever to depict lesbianism. Wanuri Kahiu's Rafiki (2018), a key text in chapter 4, is a first in two ways, as it is the first queer Kenyan film to be shown in Kenyan cinemas and the first Kenyan film ever to be screened at the Cannes Film Festival. Stories of Our Lives (dir. Jim Chuchu, 2014), which features prominently in the book's introduction, became the first East African queer film to screen at international film festivals. Turning to Nollywood in chapter 2, Green-Simms focuses on Walking with Shadows (dir. Aoife O'Kelly), an adaptation of Jude Dibia's novel of the same name that became the first Nigerian queer film to premiere internationally when it screened at the British Film Institute Film Festival in 2019. Lancelot Imasuen's Emotional Crack (2003)—another key text of the same chapter—was the first Nigerian film to make homosexuality central to its plot and to feature an actual relationship between a same-sex couple.In Queer African Cinema, the reader will enjoy an enlightening account of many first queer film festivals. These include the South African Out in Africa Film, discussed in chapter 3, which in 1994 became the first national and officially recognized queer film festival on the continent. Chapter 4 explores the east African context by way of two “first” festivals: the Nairobi Out Film Festival (OFF) that in 2011 was the first queer African film festival outside of South Africa and QKIFF in Kampala, inaugurated in 2016. These festivals were organized and films produced, circulated, and enjoyed amid germinal moments, notably 1994, which marked South Africa as the first country in the world to ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.In addition to its erudition in the domain of queer filmic texts, Queer African Cinemas offers readers numerous conceptual and analytical insights. An outstanding element of that conceptual repertoire and reading praxis is the cut that undergirds the notion of Afri-queer fugitivity, which is carefully demarcated from fugitivity as conceived in Black studies. Afri-queer fugitivity emerges from interpreting multiple films, but particularly chapter 1’s two films, Karmen Geï and Jezebel. Remakes of prior stories that feature eccentric iterations of the water spirit Mami Wata who engage in lesbianism, the films’ narratives offer in their form and in their improvisational jazz and drumming score the possibility of being read as cuts and breaks “that make waves in ways that are neither progressive nor regressive but that allow . . . for a particular emergence to occur” (71).Just as Green-Simms reformulates fugitivity, she also offers a robust examination of contemporary and perennial concepts, including resistance, resilience, hegemonic masculinity, fugitivity, waywardness, and fetishistic spectatorship. These terms get inflected, carrying nuances when confronted with African cultural productions and material contingencies. The idea of critical resilience in chapter 4, for instance, develops from Green-Simms's analyses of Rafiki, Art Attack's “Same Love (Remix)” music video, and queer art and activism within film festivals in Nairobi and Kampala. Investigating the struggles, triumphs, pains, and pleasures from these texts, Green-Simms surmises that critical resilience highlights two modes: a mode of championing “individual endurance, . . . in a way that also challenges neoliberal narratives by seeking to upend hierarchal organization and reimagine social life” and the mode of criticality, of dire necessity, and of resilience (171). This engagement shows the author's commendable knowledge of current concepts; however, her need to constantly reformulate them ends up framing the African context as fundamentally different from those from which the terms emerged.Similar to the films, characters, and storylines that make waves in Queer African Cinemas, the structure of the book is queer and wayward. Its organization is as intuitive with the geographic arrangement as it is queer with its content. Whereas two chapters deal with national contexts, Nigeria and South Africa, the two others examine two regions, West Africa and East Africa. Whereas wayward femininities and wounded masculinities occupy chapters 1 and 3, respectively, groundbreaking and broken film festivals, outrageous censorship boards, and triumphant filmmakers and audiences make up the content of chapters 2 and 4, demonstrating how modes of queer imaginative acts “are nonlinear and nondismissive” of pleasure and defeat (33).Written in clear prose and brilliantly self-reflexive in method, this sophisticated reading of queer cinematic texts deserves attention for the ways in which it converses with the most compelling scholars, thinkers, artists, and activists of queerness and gender in the generalized African context. The insights from Green-Simms's conversations with Keguro Macharia, Sylvia Tamale, Zethu Matebeni, Brenna Munro, George Barasa, Unoma Azuah, Stella Nyanzi, Dayon Monson, Beverley Ditsie, S. N. Nyeck, Binyavanga Wainaina, Ezekiel Mutua, Karl Schoonover, David Murray, and Neville Hoad make this book a must-read for those interested in queerness and film studies in Africa and beyond.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲电影中的非洲酷儿逃亡
谈到非洲酷儿电影的范围,林赛·格林-西姆斯宣称她的书不应该被视为权威或百科全书。相反,它应该被视为一套有用的阅读材料,以及学者、活动家和电影制作人的阅读模式。独立于这一说法之外,四章的深刻研究除了完成作者着手做的事情外,还履行了百科全书(在其博学中)的功能。这本书对来自非洲法语国家和英语国家的酷儿电影文本进行了整理,不仅揭示了一个充满活力的档案,而且还描绘了创新的阅读实践,可能会启发其他学者。首先,格林-西姆斯认为她对先锋电影、现实主义戏剧、流行情节剧、神秘主义电影和音乐视频的研究表明,文本所呈现的抵抗类型“总是多层的,总是由种族、性别、性别身份和国家政治,以及流派、格式和流通模式的惯例”(9)。这种将抵抗重新定义为多重的、有时是冲突的投资,严肃地对待了酷儿文化产物,以及支撑它们的生产、分销和享受的鼓舞人心和具有挑战性的物质条件。因此,酷儿非洲电影是第一次。这种第一源于格林-西姆斯长期以来与电影文本、演员、制片人、发行商、审查员、观众、电影节组织者、活动家、学者和放映地点的认真接触。她对背景的了解,源于参加会议、参加电影节、采访许多国家的不同演员,被转化为一种方法论方法,值得强调,这是有启发性的,但也很微妙。例如,补充她对纪录片《Major!》(dir。安娜丽丝·奥菲利亚(Annalise Ophelian, 2015年)通过参加2016年首届坎帕拉同性恋国际电影节(QKIFF)获得的见解,她分享说:“当我在场的坎帕拉放映时,演出表出现时,响起了热烈的掌声。观众中响起了几声“哇”,有几个人回头看了看屏幕,举起拳头,响应电影中对坚韧的呼吁,大声地说,“我还他妈的在这里。”(165,我的重点)。这个微妙而值得注意的短语“where I was present”给作者的经历提供了一些可信度,同时将文本从纯粹的民族志转变为强有力的分析。作者的经历同样有力地提醒我们,电影是被观看并参与到这个世界中来的,如果需要的话,这说明了形式分析受益于现场观众的反应,而观众的反应显然受到了作者的偏见和目标的影响。《非洲酷儿电影》的首次出版标志着它是一部形成性的作品,反映了它的大多数电影、电影节、场景和人物的地位。例如,穆罕默德·卡马拉(Mohamed Camara)的《Dakan》(1997)是西非第一部酷儿电影,通常被认为是第一部全球非洲电影。约瑟夫·盖·拉玛卡的《卡门·格伊》(2001)是第一章中讨论的两部作品之一,是第一部在银幕上描绘非洲女同性恋行为的作品,也是第一部也是唯一一部明确以同性恋为主角的作品,也是第一部非洲改编自Prosper msamrisame 1845年的中篇小说《卡门》,乔治·比才于1875年将其改编成歌剧。同样,加纳的苏格拉底·萨福的流行电影《恋爱中的女人》(1996)催生了《耶洗别》(2007-8),这是加纳的四集视频电影,也是在第一章中分析的,是第一批描绘女同性恋的非洲黑人电影之一。Wanuri Kahiu的《Rafiki》(2018)是第四章的关键文本,它在两个方面都是第一次,因为它是第一部在肯尼亚电影院放映的肯尼亚酷儿电影,也是第一部在戛纳电影节放映的肯尼亚电影。《我们生活的故事》吉姆·楚楚(Jim Chuchu, 2014)在书的介绍中占据了突出地位,成为第一部在国际电影节上放映的东非酷儿电影。在第二章中,格林-西姆斯将重点放在了《与影同行》上。该片改编自裘德·迪比亚的同名小说,于2019年在英国电影学院电影节上放映,成为第一部在国际上首映的尼日利亚酷儿电影。兰斯洛特·伊马森的《情感裂缝》(2003)——同一章节的另一个关键文本——是第一部将同性恋作为情节中心,并以同性伴侣之间的真实关系为特色的尼日利亚电影。在《酷儿非洲电影》一书中,读者将会欣赏到许多第一次酷儿电影节的启发性叙述。其中包括第三章讨论的南非走出非洲电影节,它在1994年成为非洲大陆上第一个官方认可的全国性酷儿电影节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Glq-A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies
Glq-A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Providing a much-needed forum for interdisciplinary discussion, GLQ publishes scholarship, criticism, and commentary in areas as diverse as law, science studies, religion, political science, and literary studies. Its aim is to offer queer perspectives on all issues touching on sex and sexuality. In an effort to achieve the widest possible historical, geographic, and cultural scope, GLQ particularly seeks out new research into historical periods before the twentieth century, into non-Anglophone cultures, and into the experience of those who have been marginalized by race, ethnicity, age, social class, body morphology, or sexual practice.
期刊最新文献
Can Chicana Feminists Create a Queer Mesoamerican Memory? White Trash and the Queer South Writing “INFINITYLOOPS” About the Contributors Queerness, Racialization, and Latinidad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1