Measuring Sharenting Behavior: Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Sharenting Evaluation Scale

Bet l, Eylem Ate, Serhat l, Nisa larslan, Dilek Konuksever, Bet Ulukol
{"title":"Measuring Sharenting Behavior: Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Sharenting Evaluation Scale","authors":"Bet l, Eylem Ate, Serhat l, Nisa larslan, Dilek Konuksever, Bet Ulukol","doi":"10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.08.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Sharenting, the act of parents sharing content related to their children on social media, has become a prevalent practice in today's digital age. However, concerns have been raised about the potential privacy violations and risks that this behavior may expose children to. This study aimed to investigate sharenting behaviors among Turkish parents and validate the Turkish version of the Sharenting Evaluation Scale (SES). Materials and methods: Following World Health Organization guidelines, the original SES was translated into Turkish. The scale's content validity was evaluated by experts before being administered to 276 Turkish parents. Results: The overall reliability of the scale was determined to be 0.855, which indicates its strong reliability. To further enhance the scale's reliability, the tenth item was removed after examining item-total statistics, resulting in an improved Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 for the total scale. Subscale reliability was also satisfactory, with values of 0.92 for implications, 0.64 for social behavior, and 0.68 for self-control. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was employed to assess the construct validity of the scale. The chi-square test indicated a significant fit (p<0.001, chi-square/df = 241.1/100 = 2.411), supporting the scale's reliability and measurement ability. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the 16-item SES demonstrated good reliability and validity, making it a valuable tool for assessing sharenting behaviors among Turkish parents. By utilizing this scale, healthcare professionals and researchers can gain crucial insights into parental sharing practices on social media and better understand the potential risks and implications for children's privacy and safety.","PeriodicalId":8248,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medical Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.08.213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Sharenting, the act of parents sharing content related to their children on social media, has become a prevalent practice in today's digital age. However, concerns have been raised about the potential privacy violations and risks that this behavior may expose children to. This study aimed to investigate sharenting behaviors among Turkish parents and validate the Turkish version of the Sharenting Evaluation Scale (SES). Materials and methods: Following World Health Organization guidelines, the original SES was translated into Turkish. The scale's content validity was evaluated by experts before being administered to 276 Turkish parents. Results: The overall reliability of the scale was determined to be 0.855, which indicates its strong reliability. To further enhance the scale's reliability, the tenth item was removed after examining item-total statistics, resulting in an improved Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 for the total scale. Subscale reliability was also satisfactory, with values of 0.92 for implications, 0.64 for social behavior, and 0.68 for self-control. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was employed to assess the construct validity of the scale. The chi-square test indicated a significant fit (p<0.001, chi-square/df = 241.1/100 = 2.411), supporting the scale's reliability and measurement ability. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the 16-item SES demonstrated good reliability and validity, making it a valuable tool for assessing sharenting behaviors among Turkish parents. By utilizing this scale, healthcare professionals and researchers can gain crucial insights into parental sharing practices on social media and better understand the potential risks and implications for children's privacy and safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量分享行为:土耳其版分享评估量表的效度与信度
目的:在当今的数字时代,父母在社交媒体上分享与孩子有关的内容已经成为一种普遍的做法。然而,人们对潜在的隐私侵犯和这种行为可能给儿童带来的风险表示担忧。本研究旨在调查土耳其父母的育儿行为,并验证土耳其版的育儿评估量表(SES)。材料和方法:按照世界卫生组织的指导方针,将原始SES翻译成土耳其语。该量表的内容效度由专家评估,然后对276名土耳其父母进行管理。结果:量表的总体信度为0.855,信度较强。为了进一步提高量表的信度,在检验了项目总数统计后,删除了第10个项目,使总量表的Cronbach's alpha提高到0.87。分量表的信度也令人满意,暗示的信度为0.92,社会行为的信度为0.64,自我控制的信度为0.68。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估量表的结构效度。卡方检验显示拟合显著(p<0.001,卡方/df = 241.1/100 = 2.411),支持量表的信度和测量能力。结论:土耳其版的16项SES量表具有良好的信度和效度,可作为评估土耳其父母育儿行为的有效工具。通过利用这一规模,医疗保健专业人员和研究人员可以对父母在社交媒体上的分享行为获得至关重要的见解,并更好地了解儿童隐私和安全的潜在风险和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The correlation between vitamin D levels and inflammation, as well as the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), in people who are over the age of 60. Anxiety, Depression and Coping Styles in Mothers of Children with Cow's Milk Protein Allergy The relationship between spousal support and depression, anxiety, stress, and prenatal attachment in high-risk pregnancies Comparison of serum iron, hemoglobin, ferritin and crp levels in prostate cancer patients with a control group Running title: Serum iron levels in prostate cancer Investigation of Electrocardiogram and Inflammation Parameters in Patients with First Episode Mania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1