Botulinum toxin-A in the treatment of upper facial wrinkles: efficacy comparison of different formulations

H L, Elif M, Zekayi KUTLUBAY
{"title":"Botulinum toxin-A in the treatment of upper facial wrinkles: efficacy comparison of different formulations","authors":"H L, Elif M, Zekayi KUTLUBAY","doi":"10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.09.251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: It is suggested that different formulations of botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) used for the same indication might be a factor affecting patient satisfaction. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction levels in treating upper facial wrinkles (UFW) using various BoNT-A formulations and their association with age and gender. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 600 UFW patients treated with different formulations of BoNT-A. The BoNT-A formulations included three different groups: onaBoNT-A (ONA, n:200), aboBoNT-A (ABO, n:200), and praBoNT-A (PRA, n:200).In the patient files or records, satisfaction levels from the BoNT-A application were scored as follows: 1: not satisfied, 2: slightly satisfied, 3: satisfied, 4: very satisfied, 5: completely satisfied. Results: The mean patient satisfaction scores were similar in the ONA and ABO groups, but higher in the PRA group (4.4±0.5 vs. 4.3±0.6 vs. 4.0±0.9, P <0.001, respectively). The mean satisfaction score of the patients aged 18-30 and those aged >60 were lower than the other age groups. Among all patients in the 41-50 age range, the patient satisfaction score was higher in the ONA group than the ABO and PRA group. In all female patients, the mean satisfaction score was lower in the PRA group compared to the ONA and ABO groups (P <0.001), Conclusions: While various BoNT-A formulations are generally associated with high patient satisfaction in the treatment of UFW, this can vary depending on age ranges and gender. Evaluating patient-related factors such as age and gender can contribute to the treatment planning for UFW and enhancing treatment adherence.","PeriodicalId":8248,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medical Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.09.251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: It is suggested that different formulations of botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) used for the same indication might be a factor affecting patient satisfaction. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction levels in treating upper facial wrinkles (UFW) using various BoNT-A formulations and their association with age and gender. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 600 UFW patients treated with different formulations of BoNT-A. The BoNT-A formulations included three different groups: onaBoNT-A (ONA, n:200), aboBoNT-A (ABO, n:200), and praBoNT-A (PRA, n:200).In the patient files or records, satisfaction levels from the BoNT-A application were scored as follows: 1: not satisfied, 2: slightly satisfied, 3: satisfied, 4: very satisfied, 5: completely satisfied. Results: The mean patient satisfaction scores were similar in the ONA and ABO groups, but higher in the PRA group (4.4±0.5 vs. 4.3±0.6 vs. 4.0±0.9, P <0.001, respectively). The mean satisfaction score of the patients aged 18-30 and those aged >60 were lower than the other age groups. Among all patients in the 41-50 age range, the patient satisfaction score was higher in the ONA group than the ABO and PRA group. In all female patients, the mean satisfaction score was lower in the PRA group compared to the ONA and ABO groups (P <0.001), Conclusions: While various BoNT-A formulations are generally associated with high patient satisfaction in the treatment of UFW, this can vary depending on age ranges and gender. Evaluating patient-related factors such as age and gender can contribute to the treatment planning for UFW and enhancing treatment adherence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肉毒毒素a治疗上面部皱纹:不同配方的疗效比较
目的:提示同一适应症使用不同配方的肉毒毒素a (BoNT-A)可能是影响患者满意度的一个因素。本研究旨在评估使用不同BoNT-A配方治疗上面部皱纹(UFW)的患者满意度及其与年龄和性别的关系。材料与方法:本回顾性研究包括600例使用不同BoNT-A配方治疗的UFW患者。BoNT-A配方包括三个不同的组:onaBoNT-A (ONA, n:200), aboBoNT-A (ABO, n:200)和praBoNT-A (PRA, n:200)。在患者档案或记录中,BoNT-A应用的满意度评分如下:1:不满意,2:稍微满意,3:满意,4:非常满意,5:完全满意。结果:ONA组和ABO组患者平均满意度得分相似,PRA组患者满意度得分更高(4.4±0.5比4.3±0.6比4.0±0.9,P <0.001)。18 ~ 30岁和60岁患者的平均满意度得分低于其他年龄组。在41 ~ 50岁的患者中,ONA组患者满意度评分高于ABO和PRA组。在所有女性患者中,与ONA组和ABO组相比,PRA组的平均满意度得分较低(P <0.001)。结论:虽然各种BoNT-A配方通常与UFW治疗的高患者满意度相关,但这可能因年龄范围和性别而异。评估年龄和性别等患者相关因素有助于制定UFW的治疗计划并提高治疗依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The correlation between vitamin D levels and inflammation, as well as the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), in people who are over the age of 60. Anxiety, Depression and Coping Styles in Mothers of Children with Cow's Milk Protein Allergy The relationship between spousal support and depression, anxiety, stress, and prenatal attachment in high-risk pregnancies Comparison of serum iron, hemoglobin, ferritin and crp levels in prostate cancer patients with a control group Running title: Serum iron levels in prostate cancer Investigation of Electrocardiogram and Inflammation Parameters in Patients with First Episode Mania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1