MohammedN Al Mallah, HaithamB Fathi, QasimS Al Chalabi
{"title":"Alopecia areata: trichoscopic markers in determining disease activity","authors":"MohammedN Al Mallah, HaithamB Fathi, QasimS Al Chalabi","doi":"10.4103/jewd.jewd_24_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Trichoscopy is an important tool in detecting alopecia areata activity. Objective To determine the relation of the trichoscopic markers with alopecia areata activity. To demonstrate its discriminative capabilities in classifying alopecia areata activity. Patients and methods One hundred and thirty-seven patients (86 males and 51 females) with alopecia areata underwent dermoscopic assessment of bald patches. Hair-pulling test was used to assess disease activity. A 2×2 table of alopecia areata activity and trichoscopic marker was used to estimate sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, predictive value, and likelihood ratio. Results Trichoscopic markers commonly seen in alopecia areata were short vellus hairs (65.7%), broken hairs (56.9%), exclamation mark hairs (46.7%), and black dots (42.3%). According to disease activity, exclamation mark hairs (91.9%) and broken hairs (87.1%) were the most common markers in active disease while yellow dots (72.3%) and short vellus hairs (69.3%) were in stable disease. Exclamation mark hairs (91.9% vs. 9.3%), broken hairs (87.1% vs. 38.7%), black dots (53.2% vs. 33.3%), and triangular hairs (21.0% vs. 8.0%) were significantly higher in active compared with stable alopecia areata. The discriminative capability index reveals that exclamation mark hairs (91.9%) and broken hairs (87.1%) were the most sensitive signs. Triangular hairs (92.0%), and exclamation mark hairs (90.7%) were the most specific markers. Exclamation mark hairs and broken hairs were the most reliable markers (91.2% and 72.9%, respectively). The presence of exclamation mark hairs, triangular hairs, and broken hairs in bald patches raises the likelihood ratio of activity by 9.88, 2.65, and 2.45 times. Conclusion Exclamation mark hairs are the most important reliable marker of disease activity. Broken hairs, triangular hairs, and black dots found in bald patches increase the chance of disease activity. Other trichoscopic markers(yellow dots, pigtail hairs, short vellus hairs, and upright regrowing hairs) were useless signs in determining disease activity.","PeriodicalId":17298,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Women's Dermatologic Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Women's Dermatologic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jewd.jewd_24_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Trichoscopy is an important tool in detecting alopecia areata activity. Objective To determine the relation of the trichoscopic markers with alopecia areata activity. To demonstrate its discriminative capabilities in classifying alopecia areata activity. Patients and methods One hundred and thirty-seven patients (86 males and 51 females) with alopecia areata underwent dermoscopic assessment of bald patches. Hair-pulling test was used to assess disease activity. A 2×2 table of alopecia areata activity and trichoscopic marker was used to estimate sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, predictive value, and likelihood ratio. Results Trichoscopic markers commonly seen in alopecia areata were short vellus hairs (65.7%), broken hairs (56.9%), exclamation mark hairs (46.7%), and black dots (42.3%). According to disease activity, exclamation mark hairs (91.9%) and broken hairs (87.1%) were the most common markers in active disease while yellow dots (72.3%) and short vellus hairs (69.3%) were in stable disease. Exclamation mark hairs (91.9% vs. 9.3%), broken hairs (87.1% vs. 38.7%), black dots (53.2% vs. 33.3%), and triangular hairs (21.0% vs. 8.0%) were significantly higher in active compared with stable alopecia areata. The discriminative capability index reveals that exclamation mark hairs (91.9%) and broken hairs (87.1%) were the most sensitive signs. Triangular hairs (92.0%), and exclamation mark hairs (90.7%) were the most specific markers. Exclamation mark hairs and broken hairs were the most reliable markers (91.2% and 72.9%, respectively). The presence of exclamation mark hairs, triangular hairs, and broken hairs in bald patches raises the likelihood ratio of activity by 9.88, 2.65, and 2.45 times. Conclusion Exclamation mark hairs are the most important reliable marker of disease activity. Broken hairs, triangular hairs, and black dots found in bald patches increase the chance of disease activity. Other trichoscopic markers(yellow dots, pigtail hairs, short vellus hairs, and upright regrowing hairs) were useless signs in determining disease activity.
毛发镜检查是检测斑秃活动性的重要工具。目的探讨毛发镜检查指标与斑秃活动性的关系。以证明其区分能力,分类斑秃活动。患者与方法137例斑秃患者(男86例,女51例)接受皮肤镜检查。采用拔毛试验评估疾病活动性。使用2×2斑秃活动性和毛发镜标记表来评估敏感性、特异性、准确性、预测值和似然比。结果斑秃的毛镜标记为短绒毛(65.7%)、断毛(56.9%)、感叹号毛(46.7%)、黑点(42.3%)。根据疾病活动度,感叹号毛(91.9%)和断毛(87.1%)是疾病活动期最常见的标志,黄点毛(72.3%)和短绒毛(69.3%)是疾病稳定期最常见的标志。感叹号发(91.9% vs. 9.3%)、断发(87.1% vs. 38.7%)、黑点发(53.2% vs. 33.3%)和三角形发(21.0% vs. 8.0%)在活动性斑秃中明显高于稳定性斑秃。判别能力指数显示,感叹号毛(91.9%)和断毛(87.1%)是最敏感的标志。三角毛(92.0%)和感叹号毛(90.7%)是最特异的标记。感叹号毛和断毛是最可靠的标记(分别为91.2%和72.9%)。在秃斑中出现感叹号毛、三角毛和断毛会使活动的可能性比分别提高9.88倍、2.65倍和2.45倍。结论感叹号毛是最重要、最可靠的疾病活动标志。在秃斑上发现的断裂的头发、三角形的头发和黑点增加了疾病活动的机会。其他毛发检查标记(黄点、小辫子、短绒毛和直立再生毛发)在确定疾病活动方面是无用的迹象。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of The Egyptian Women''s Dermatologic Society (JEWDS) was founded by Professor Zenab M.G. El-Gothamy. JEWDS is published three times per year in January, May and September. Original articles, case reports, correspondence and review articles submitted for publication must be original and must not have been published previously or considered for publication elsewhere. Their subject should pertain to dermatology or a related scientific and technical subject within the field of dermatology.