Selection of drain diameter in initial drainage of patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis

S. I. Remizov, A. V. Andreev, V. M. Durleshter, S. A. Gabriel, O. V. Zasyadko
{"title":"Selection of drain diameter in initial drainage of patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis","authors":"S. I. Remizov, A. V. Andreev, V. M. Durleshter, S. A. Gabriel, O. V. Zasyadko","doi":"10.30629/0023-2149-2023-101-9-10-496-501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To evaluate the treatment outcomes of acute necrotizing pancreatitis using drains of different diameters in patients with acute necrotic accumulations. Materials and methods. From 2013 to 2018, 124 patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis were treated using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Group 1 consisted of 56 patients who were initially given drains with a diameter of 8–16 Fr, while Group 2 consisted of 68 patients who were given drains with a diameter of 28–32 Fr. The patient groups were comparable in terms of main indicators (p > 0.05). Results. In Group 1, replacement with larger diameter drains was needed in 100% of cases, while in Group 2 it was needed in 18.7% of patients (p < 0.05). As a final treatment method, puncture-drainage technology was used in Group 1 for 31 (55.4%) patients, and in Group 2 for 57 (83.8%) (p < 0.05). The incidence of perioperative complications was 51.7% in Group 1 and 16.1% in Group 2 (p < 0.05). The duration of hospitalization in Group 1 was on average 16 ± 7.3 days longer. Mortality rate was 30.4% in Group 1 and 11.8% in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Conclusion. The use of wide-bore drains at the initial stage increases the effectiveness of puncture-drainage treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis and allows for a reduction in mortality rate.","PeriodicalId":17856,"journal":{"name":"Klinicheskaia meditsina","volume":"30 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinicheskaia meditsina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30629/0023-2149-2023-101-9-10-496-501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the treatment outcomes of acute necrotizing pancreatitis using drains of different diameters in patients with acute necrotic accumulations. Materials and methods. From 2013 to 2018, 124 patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis were treated using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Group 1 consisted of 56 patients who were initially given drains with a diameter of 8–16 Fr, while Group 2 consisted of 68 patients who were given drains with a diameter of 28–32 Fr. The patient groups were comparable in terms of main indicators (p > 0.05). Results. In Group 1, replacement with larger diameter drains was needed in 100% of cases, while in Group 2 it was needed in 18.7% of patients (p < 0.05). As a final treatment method, puncture-drainage technology was used in Group 1 for 31 (55.4%) patients, and in Group 2 for 57 (83.8%) (p < 0.05). The incidence of perioperative complications was 51.7% in Group 1 and 16.1% in Group 2 (p < 0.05). The duration of hospitalization in Group 1 was on average 16 ± 7.3 days longer. Mortality rate was 30.4% in Group 1 and 11.8% in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Conclusion. The use of wide-bore drains at the initial stage increases the effectiveness of puncture-drainage treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis and allows for a reduction in mortality rate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性坏死性胰腺炎初始引流管直径的选择
目标。目的探讨急性坏死性胰腺炎急性坏死性积液采用不同直径引流管的治疗效果。材料和方法。2013年至2018年,124例急性坏死性胰腺炎患者采用微创手术治疗。1组56例患者最初给予直径为8 - 16fr的引流管,2组68例患者最初给予直径为28 - 32fr的引流管。两组患者在主要指标上具有可比性(p >0.05)。结果。在组1中,100%的病例需要更换更大直径的引流管,而在组2中,18.7%的患者需要更换更大直径的引流管(p <0.05)。第一组31例(55.4%)患者采用穿刺引流技术,第二组57例(83.8%)患者采用穿刺引流技术(p <0.05)。围手术期并发症发生率1组为51.7%,2组为16.1% (p <0.05)。1组患者住院时间平均延长16±7.3 d。组1死亡率30.4%,组2死亡率11.8% (p <0.05)。结论。在初始阶段使用大口径引流管可提高穿刺引流治疗急性坏死性胰腺炎的有效性,并可降低死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative characteristics of the clinical course of a new coronavirus infection depending on the vaccination status Dynamics and variability of regional mortality rates from liver and biliary tract diseases in the period from 2019 to 2021 Modern possibilities of prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with gastric and duodenal stress ulcers Rehabilitation of patients who underwent surgery for transverse flatfoot using exercise therapy Hybrid approach in the surgical treatment of multiple cerebral aneurysm in the acute period of rupture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1