Perception bias, social embedding and consumer willingness to pay for chilled pork packaging: empirical analysis based on multiple experiments

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY British Food Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1108/bfj-02-2023-0096
Jiehong Zhou, Fei Han, Xiaoyu Han, Zhen Yan
{"title":"Perception bias, social embedding and consumer willingness to pay for chilled pork packaging: empirical analysis based on multiple experiments","authors":"Jiehong Zhou, Fei Han, Xiaoyu Han, Zhen Yan","doi":"10.1108/bfj-02-2023-0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The paper proposes a research method to verify the perception bias of consumers on the freshness preservation effects of vacuum packaging (VP) and modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) chilled pork packages, the influence of “sensory experience” on correcting consumers' perception bias of packaging performance and willingness-to-pay (WTP) enhancement channels. Design/methodology/approach Using data from 458 and 188 participants who completed the contingent valuation method (CVM) and auction experiment, respectively, the study aimed to uncover consumers' packing quality perception bias and WTP, and investigated the societal factors that contribute to variations in WTP. Findings The CVM experiment revealed that although consumers' high perception bias rate toward MAP to maintain freshness, as compared to lab test results, came along with low WTP premium to cost rate with sensory experience in the auction experiment, the proportion of consumers with quality perception bias decreased from 49.85% to 34.46%, while the WTP premium to cost rate for MAP increased largely by 36.7%. Perceptive embedding has a positive effect on chilled pork packaging WTP, while normative embedding decreases WTP. Originality/value The findings emphasize the need of public policies to promote positive consumption attitudes, while whittling the negative consumption norms, to increase the WTP for packaged child pork and promote the chilled pork market formation.","PeriodicalId":9231,"journal":{"name":"British Food Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Food Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-02-2023-0096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The paper proposes a research method to verify the perception bias of consumers on the freshness preservation effects of vacuum packaging (VP) and modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) chilled pork packages, the influence of “sensory experience” on correcting consumers' perception bias of packaging performance and willingness-to-pay (WTP) enhancement channels. Design/methodology/approach Using data from 458 and 188 participants who completed the contingent valuation method (CVM) and auction experiment, respectively, the study aimed to uncover consumers' packing quality perception bias and WTP, and investigated the societal factors that contribute to variations in WTP. Findings The CVM experiment revealed that although consumers' high perception bias rate toward MAP to maintain freshness, as compared to lab test results, came along with low WTP premium to cost rate with sensory experience in the auction experiment, the proportion of consumers with quality perception bias decreased from 49.85% to 34.46%, while the WTP premium to cost rate for MAP increased largely by 36.7%. Perceptive embedding has a positive effect on chilled pork packaging WTP, while normative embedding decreases WTP. Originality/value The findings emphasize the need of public policies to promote positive consumption attitudes, while whittling the negative consumption norms, to increase the WTP for packaged child pork and promote the chilled pork market formation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知偏差、社会嵌入与消费者对冰鲜猪肉包装的支付意愿:基于多重实验的实证分析
目的提出一种研究方法,验证消费者对真空包装(VP)和气调包装(MAP)冷冻猪肉包装保鲜效果的感知偏差、“感官体验”对纠正消费者对包装性能感知偏差的影响以及购买意愿(WTP)增强渠道。设计/方法/方法采用条件评估法(CVM)和拍卖实验分别对458名和188名参与者进行数据分析,揭示消费者对包装质量感知偏差和WTP的影响,并探讨影响WTP变化的社会因素。CVM实验发现,尽管消费者对MAP保持新鲜度的感知偏倚率较高,但与实验室测试结果相比,在拍卖实验中感官体验的WTP溢价比成本率较低,但质量感知偏倚的消费者比例从49.85%下降到34.46%,而MAP的WTP溢价比成本率大幅上升了36.7%。感知嵌入对冷鲜猪肉包装WTP有正向影响,而规范嵌入则降低WTP。研究结果强调需要公共政策来促进积极的消费态度,同时削减消极的消费规范,以增加包装儿童猪肉的WTP,促进冰鲜猪肉市场的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Food Journal
British Food Journal 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
15.20%
发文量
219
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: After 115 years, the British Food Journal (BFJ) continues to be highly respected worldwide for its broad and unique interdisciplinary coverage of the latest food-related double blind peer-reviewed research. It links all sectors of this dynamic industry, keeping abreast of emerging trends, topical and controversial issues and informing and stimulating debate. - See more at: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=bfj#sthash.O3wH4pEh.dpuf
期刊最新文献
Modulating variables impacting the intersection of health and environmental concerns in organic food purchasing decisions Modulating variables impacting the intersection of health and environmental concerns in organic food purchasing decisions Revealing the organic food consumption intention in Afyonkarahisar: a study on the impact of health, safety, value and attributes Value seeking, health-conscious or sustainability-concerned? Profiling fruit and vegetable consumers in Euro-Mediterranean countries Consumer visual attention to food allergen information on restaurant menus: an eye-tracking study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1