Care Bundles and Peripheral Arterial Catheters: A Scoping Review

Heather Reynolds, John Gowardman, Christine Woods
{"title":"Care Bundles and Peripheral Arterial Catheters: A Scoping Review","authors":"Heather Reynolds, John Gowardman, Christine Woods","doi":"10.2309/java-d-23-00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Highlights What we know about the topic: Recommendations for the use of vascular access care bundles to reduce infection are followed for different devices. The risk of arterial catheter-related infection is comparable with short-term, non-cuffed central venous catheters. There are practice concerns for clinicians inserting and caring for peripheral arterial catheters. What this paper adds: The selected studies had a theme of decreased infection after using bundled strategies for all devices. Few studies addressed use of bundles for care of peripheral arterial catheters. High quality research should be performed about using care bundles for insertion and care of arterial catheters. Abstract Introduction: A scoping review of the literature was performed. Aims/Objectives: To find information on the use of care bundles for care of arterial, central, and peripherally inserted venous catheters. Methods: Data was extracted by 2 independent researchers using standardized methodology Results: Results of 84 studies included 2 (2.4%) randomized controlled trials, 38 (45.2%) observational studies, 29 (34.5%) quality projects, and 15 (17.9%) reviews. Populations had more adults than pediatric patients. All studies had the most prominent theme of decreased infection in all devices after using bundle strategies. Discussion and Conclusions: The mapping of available evidence strongly supports the use of care bundles to reduce infection in the care of all intravascular devices. However, deficiencies regarding practice concerns about insertion and care of arterial catheters highlight areas for future research with the aim to eliminate the gap in the evidence of studies of care bundles for peripheral arterial catheters.","PeriodicalId":35321,"journal":{"name":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2309/java-d-23-00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Highlights What we know about the topic: Recommendations for the use of vascular access care bundles to reduce infection are followed for different devices. The risk of arterial catheter-related infection is comparable with short-term, non-cuffed central venous catheters. There are practice concerns for clinicians inserting and caring for peripheral arterial catheters. What this paper adds: The selected studies had a theme of decreased infection after using bundled strategies for all devices. Few studies addressed use of bundles for care of peripheral arterial catheters. High quality research should be performed about using care bundles for insertion and care of arterial catheters. Abstract Introduction: A scoping review of the literature was performed. Aims/Objectives: To find information on the use of care bundles for care of arterial, central, and peripherally inserted venous catheters. Methods: Data was extracted by 2 independent researchers using standardized methodology Results: Results of 84 studies included 2 (2.4%) randomized controlled trials, 38 (45.2%) observational studies, 29 (34.5%) quality projects, and 15 (17.9%) reviews. Populations had more adults than pediatric patients. All studies had the most prominent theme of decreased infection in all devices after using bundle strategies. Discussion and Conclusions: The mapping of available evidence strongly supports the use of care bundles to reduce infection in the care of all intravascular devices. However, deficiencies regarding practice concerns about insertion and care of arterial catheters highlight areas for future research with the aim to eliminate the gap in the evidence of studies of care bundles for peripheral arterial catheters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理束和外周动脉导管:范围综述
我们对该主题的了解:对不同设备使用血管通路护理包以减少感染的建议。动脉导管相关感染的风险与短期无套管中心静脉导管相当。临床医生对外周动脉导管的插入和护理存在实践问题。本文补充的内容:所选研究的主题是在对所有设备使用捆绑策略后减少感染。很少有研究涉及使用束外周动脉导管的护理。应对使用护理包进行动脉导管插入和护理进行高质量的研究。摘要引言:对文献进行了范围综述。目的/目的:寻找护理包在动脉、中心和周围静脉导管置入护理中的使用信息。结果:84项研究的结果包括2项(2.4%)随机对照试验、38项(45.2%)观察性研究、29项(34.5%)质量项目和15项(17.9%)综述。人群中成人患者多于儿科患者。所有的研究都有一个最突出的主题,即在使用捆绑策略后,所有设备的感染都减少了。讨论和结论:现有证据的映射强烈支持使用护理包来减少所有血管内装置的感染。然而,关于动脉导管插入和护理的实践问题的不足突出了未来研究的领域,旨在消除外周动脉导管护理束研究证据的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) is an association of healthcare professionals founded in 1985 to promote the emerging vascular access specialty. Today, its multidisciplinary membership advances research, professional and public education to shape practice and enhance patient outcomes, and partners with the device manufacturing community to bring about evidence-based innovations in vascular access.
期刊最新文献
Care Bundles and Peripheral Arterial Catheters: A Scoping Review The Difference between Quality Improvement and Human Subject Research: Foundational Support Unsafe: Sutures as an Unnecessary Risk for Clinicians and Patients: Editor’s Message President’s Message 2022 Association for Vascular Access Scientific Meeting: Poster Abstracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1