Chemical Coagulation Applied for the Removal of Polyethylene and Expanded Polystyrene Microplastics

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.12911/22998993/171525
Thaynara Lorrayne de Oliveira, Juliana Miranda Bacelar, Francisco Javier Cuba Teran, Renata Medici Frayne Cuba, Victor Hugo Souza Florentino Porto
{"title":"Chemical Coagulation Applied for the Removal of Polyethylene and Expanded Polystyrene Microplastics","authors":"Thaynara Lorrayne de Oliveira, Juliana Miranda Bacelar, Francisco Javier Cuba Teran, Renata Medici Frayne Cuba, Victor Hugo Souza Florentino Porto","doi":"10.12911/22998993/171525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microplastics are emerging pollutants, formed through weathering, with sizes equal to or smaller than 5 mm. They can reach surface and groundwater sources, as well as oceans and seas through natural pathways or from the discharge of liquid effluents, causing immeasurable effects on human beings. This study aimed to evaluate the optimal conditions for the removal of polyethylene (PE) and expanded polystyrene (EPS) microplastics through coagulation and flocculation processes using aluminum sulfate. To achieve this goal, two 2² full factorial designs were employed, including two replicates at the central points. The sizes of the microplastics were fixed at 0.6 mm and 0.9 mm for PE and EPS, respectively. The selected independent variables were Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 and pH. The experiments were conducted considering rapid mixing parameters (400 rpm for 1 min), slow mixing (100 rpm for 15 min), and sedimentation (30 min), with a velocity of 0.1 cm·min – ¹ in the Jar Test. Turbidity determination was applied to quantify the remaining microplastics. Consequently, it was observed that the highest efficiency occurred for PE microplastics at 4.25 mg·L – ¹ of Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 and pH 5, and for EPS microplastics at 6.00 mg·L – ¹ of Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 and pH 4, resulting in removal rates of 96.81% and 96.30% and turbidity levels of 0.38 and 0.50 NTU, respectively. The removal efficiencies of microplastics were similar, with a decrease at pH 6 for both, as low ionic strength prevents the release of H + ions.","PeriodicalId":15652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecological Engineering","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/171525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microplastics are emerging pollutants, formed through weathering, with sizes equal to or smaller than 5 mm. They can reach surface and groundwater sources, as well as oceans and seas through natural pathways or from the discharge of liquid effluents, causing immeasurable effects on human beings. This study aimed to evaluate the optimal conditions for the removal of polyethylene (PE) and expanded polystyrene (EPS) microplastics through coagulation and flocculation processes using aluminum sulfate. To achieve this goal, two 2² full factorial designs were employed, including two replicates at the central points. The sizes of the microplastics were fixed at 0.6 mm and 0.9 mm for PE and EPS, respectively. The selected independent variables were Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 and pH. The experiments were conducted considering rapid mixing parameters (400 rpm for 1 min), slow mixing (100 rpm for 15 min), and sedimentation (30 min), with a velocity of 0.1 cm·min – ¹ in the Jar Test. Turbidity determination was applied to quantify the remaining microplastics. Consequently, it was observed that the highest efficiency occurred for PE microplastics at 4.25 mg·L – ¹ of Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 and pH 5, and for EPS microplastics at 6.00 mg·L – ¹ of Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 and pH 4, resulting in removal rates of 96.81% and 96.30% and turbidity levels of 0.38 and 0.50 NTU, respectively. The removal efficiencies of microplastics were similar, with a decrease at pH 6 for both, as low ionic strength prevents the release of H + ions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化学混凝法去除聚乙烯和膨胀聚苯乙烯微塑料
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ecological Engineering
Journal of Ecological Engineering ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
379
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: - Industrial and municipal waste management - Pro-ecological technologies and products - Energy-saving technologies - Environmental landscaping - Environmental monitoring - Climate change in the environment - Sustainable development - Processing and usage of mineral resources - Recovery of valuable materials and fuels - Surface water and groundwater management - Water and wastewater treatment - Smog and air pollution prevention - Protection and reclamation of soils - Reclamation and revitalization of degraded areas - Heavy metals in the environment - Renewable energy technologies - Environmental protection of rural areas - Restoration and protection of urban environment - Prevention of noise in the environment - Environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) - Simulations and computer modeling for the environment
期刊最新文献
Indoor Air Quality in Schools Located in Poland, Lublin Province Estimation of Photovoltaic Module Performance with L-Shaped Aluminum Fins Using Weather Data Determination of the Composition of Wastewater from Individual Processes of Leather Tanning Production in a Small Plant Incidence of the Leachates from the Quevedo Emerging Cell on the Water Quality of the Limón Stream, San Cristóbal Parish, Quevedo Canton Reducing Tannery Wastewater Pollutants through a Magnetic-Field and Ozone-Treatment Electrocoagulation System using Response Surface Methodology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1