Assessment of Building Physical Vulnerability in Earthquake-Debris Flow Disaster Chain

IF 2.9 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Disaster Risk Science Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s13753-023-00509-7
Hao Zheng, Zhifei Deng, Lanlan Guo, Jifu Liu, Lianyou Liu, Tiewei Li, Huan Zheng, Tao Zheng
{"title":"Assessment of Building Physical Vulnerability in Earthquake-Debris Flow Disaster Chain","authors":"Hao Zheng, Zhifei Deng, Lanlan Guo, Jifu Liu, Lianyou Liu, Tiewei Li, Huan Zheng, Tao Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s13753-023-00509-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Large earthquakes not only directly damage buildings but also trigger debris flows, which cause secondary damage to buildings, forming a more destructive earthquake-debris flow disaster chain. A quantitative assessment of building vulnerability is essential for damage assessment after a disaster and for pre-disaster prevention. Using mechanical analysis based on pushover, a physical vulnerability assessment model of buildings in the earthquake-debris flow disaster chain is proposed to assess the vulnerability of buildings in Beichuan County, China. Based on the specific sequence of events in the earthquake-debris flow disaster chain, the seismic vulnerability of buildings is 79%, the flow impact and burial vulnerabilities of damaged buildings to debris flow are 92% and 28% respectively, and the holistic vulnerability of buildings under the disaster chain is 57%. By comparing different vulnerability assessment methods, we observed that the physical vulnerability of buildings under the disaster chain process is not equal to the statistical summation of the vulnerabilities to independent hazards, which implies that the structural properties and vulnerability of buildings have changed during the disaster chain process. Our results provide an integrated explanation of building vulnerability, which is essential for understanding building vulnerability in earthquake-debris flow disaster chain and building vulnerability under other disaster chains.","PeriodicalId":48740,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disaster Risk Science","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disaster Risk Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-023-00509-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Large earthquakes not only directly damage buildings but also trigger debris flows, which cause secondary damage to buildings, forming a more destructive earthquake-debris flow disaster chain. A quantitative assessment of building vulnerability is essential for damage assessment after a disaster and for pre-disaster prevention. Using mechanical analysis based on pushover, a physical vulnerability assessment model of buildings in the earthquake-debris flow disaster chain is proposed to assess the vulnerability of buildings in Beichuan County, China. Based on the specific sequence of events in the earthquake-debris flow disaster chain, the seismic vulnerability of buildings is 79%, the flow impact and burial vulnerabilities of damaged buildings to debris flow are 92% and 28% respectively, and the holistic vulnerability of buildings under the disaster chain is 57%. By comparing different vulnerability assessment methods, we observed that the physical vulnerability of buildings under the disaster chain process is not equal to the statistical summation of the vulnerabilities to independent hazards, which implies that the structural properties and vulnerability of buildings have changed during the disaster chain process. Our results provide an integrated explanation of building vulnerability, which is essential for understanding building vulnerability in earthquake-debris flow disaster chain and building vulnerability under other disaster chains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地震-泥石流灾害链中建筑物物理脆弱性评估
大地震不仅对建筑物造成直接破坏,还会引发泥石流对建筑物造成二次破坏,形成更具破坏性的地震-泥石流灾害链。对建筑物脆弱性进行定量评估对于灾后的损害评估和灾前预防至关重要。采用基于推覆的力学分析方法,建立了地震-泥石流灾害链中建筑物物理易损性评价模型,对北川县建筑物进行易损性评价。根据地震-泥石流灾害链中具体的事件顺序,建筑物的地震易损性为79%,受损建筑物对泥石流的流动冲击易损性为92%,掩埋易损性为28%,灾害链下建筑物的整体易损性为57%。通过对不同易损性评估方法的比较,我们发现灾害链过程下建筑物的物理易损性不等于对独立灾害易损性的统计总和,这意味着在灾害链过程中建筑物的结构特性和易损性发生了变化。我们的研究结果为理解地震-泥石流灾害链中的建筑脆弱性以及其他灾害链下的建筑脆弱性提供了一个综合的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Science (IJDRS) provides a pioneering platform for researchers and practitioners aiming at greater resilience and integrated risk governance in view of local, regional, and global disasters. IJDRS breaks new ground in research about disaster risks by connecting in-depth studies of actual disasters and of specific practices of disaster risk management with investigations of the global dynamics of disaster risks and theories and models relevant for advanced integrated risk governance.
期刊最新文献
Identify Landslide Precursors from Time Series InSAR Results Navigating Interoperability in Disaster Management: Insights of Current Trends and Challenges in Saudi Arabia Damage Curves Derived from Hurricane Ike in the West of Galveston Bay Based on Insurance Claims and Hydrodynamic Simulations Identifying Neighborhood Effects on Geohazard Adaptation in Mountainous Rural Areas of China: A Spatial Econometric Model Mapping Seismic Hazard for Canadian Sites Using Spatially Smoothed Seismicity Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1