The Guidelines for Developing the Integration of Production, Education, and Research under the Background of "Double High Plan" in Guizhou, China

Abstract

The objectives of this research were: 1) to study the current situation of industry-education integration under the background of the "double-high plan" in higher vocational college in Guizhou, China, 2) to develop the guidelines for industry-education integration under the background of the " double-high plan" in higher vocational college in Guizhou, China, and 3) to evaluate the adaptability and feasibility of the guidelines for industry-education integration under the background of the " double-high plan" in higher vocational college in Guizhou, China. The population of this research contained 420 teachers from four higher vocational colleges. According to the Krejcie and Morgan sampling table (1970), the sample group of this research was 201 teachers from four higher vocational colleges in Guizhou, and simple random sampling was used in this research.Furthermore, the interviewees of this research were five administrators, teachers, and industry representatives. Five high-level administrators in Guizhou were the five experts in evaluating the adaptability and feasibility of the guidelines. Purposive sampling was used in this part.The research instruments were a questionnaire, a semi-structured interview, and an evaluation form. The statistics for data analysis were frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and content analysis.The results found that: 1) the current situation of industry-education integration under the background of the "double high plan" in the higher vocational college in Guizhou was government policy support, the attractiveness of higher vocational colleges, 2) The guidelines for industry-education integration under the background of the "double high plan" in higher vocational colleges in Guizhou had three dimensions: government dimension, higher vocational colleges dimension, and enterprises dimension, and 3) The adaptability and feasibility of the guidelines were at the highest level, with values ranging from 4.00 to 5.00.