Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Resident Doctors Towards use of Proton Pump Inhibitors in A Tertiary Care Hospital in Pune, India: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.13005/bpj/2742
Sonali Pradeep Suryawanshi, Priti Pravin Dhande, Pallawi Shashank Khatavkar, Linpadmaja Prabhakar Thakur
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Resident Doctors Towards use of Proton Pump Inhibitors in A Tertiary Care Hospital in Pune, India: A Cross-Sectional Survey","authors":"Sonali Pradeep Suryawanshi, Priti Pravin Dhande, Pallawi Shashank Khatavkar, Linpadmaja Prabhakar Thakur","doi":"10.13005/bpj/2742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: The most commonly prescribed drugs in healthcare systems are proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Several studies have found that globally PPIs are frequently used without proper justification. Appropriate and updated knowledge about PPI among medical professionals is essential to enhance the rationale of PPI application. The present study with this goal was initiated to evaluate the understanding and behavioral practices toward PPI use among resident doctors in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Pune, western India. Method: A cross sectional survey using structured questionnaire. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 137 resident doctors. 82.5% of them prescribed acid-suppressing drugs for acute gastritis and other drugs in combination with them as the most common indications for the majority of their patients. These prescriptions were based on the consultant's or unit's policy, and resident doctors were not given the liberty to breach this policy. 71.5% of the respondents chose PPIs as their first choice, and 75.1% preferred the oral route. 10.2% of them claimed to have encountered a PPI-related adverse event. Despite the fact that 75.9% of the respondents preferred to prescribe PPIs for short durations, a lack of awareness about the possible risks associated with chronic PPI use was noted. 58.4% of resident doctors preferred using the step-down strategy, but 19.7% of participants were unaware of step up or step down when prescribing PPIs. The concept of drug interactions with the co-administration of PPI was also less understood by study participants. Conclusion: In the present survey study participants had less knowledge on correct indications for PPI usage as they fared PPI over any other acid-reducing medications to majority of their patients. There was also a lack of understanding of PPI adverse drug reactions, drug-drug interactions, and specific PPI administration approaches.","PeriodicalId":9054,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/2742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The most commonly prescribed drugs in healthcare systems are proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Several studies have found that globally PPIs are frequently used without proper justification. Appropriate and updated knowledge about PPI among medical professionals is essential to enhance the rationale of PPI application. The present study with this goal was initiated to evaluate the understanding and behavioral practices toward PPI use among resident doctors in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Pune, western India. Method: A cross sectional survey using structured questionnaire. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 137 resident doctors. 82.5% of them prescribed acid-suppressing drugs for acute gastritis and other drugs in combination with them as the most common indications for the majority of their patients. These prescriptions were based on the consultant's or unit's policy, and resident doctors were not given the liberty to breach this policy. 71.5% of the respondents chose PPIs as their first choice, and 75.1% preferred the oral route. 10.2% of them claimed to have encountered a PPI-related adverse event. Despite the fact that 75.9% of the respondents preferred to prescribe PPIs for short durations, a lack of awareness about the possible risks associated with chronic PPI use was noted. 58.4% of resident doctors preferred using the step-down strategy, but 19.7% of participants were unaware of step up or step down when prescribing PPIs. The concept of drug interactions with the co-administration of PPI was also less understood by study participants. Conclusion: In the present survey study participants had less knowledge on correct indications for PPI usage as they fared PPI over any other acid-reducing medications to majority of their patients. There was also a lack of understanding of PPI adverse drug reactions, drug-drug interactions, and specific PPI administration approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度浦那三级医院住院医师对质子泵抑制剂使用的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面调查
背景和目的:医疗保健系统中最常用的处方药是质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)。几项研究发现,在全球范围内,PPIs经常在没有适当理由的情况下使用。医学专业人员对PPI的适当和更新的知识对于提高PPI应用的合理性至关重要。本研究的目的是评估印度西部浦那一家三级护理教学医院住院医生对PPI使用的理解和行为实践。方法:采用结构化问卷进行横断面调查。结果:共有137名住院医师完成问卷调查。82.5%的受访医生将治疗急性胃炎的抑酸药与其他药物合用作为大多数患者最常见的适应症。这些处方是基于咨询师或单位的政策,住院医生没有违反这一政策的自由。71.5%的受访者首选PPIs, 75.1%的受访者首选口服途径。其中10.2%的人声称遇到过与ppi相关的不良事件。尽管事实上,75.9%的受访者倾向于开短时间的PPI,但注意到缺乏对慢性PPI使用可能存在的风险的认识。58.4%的住院医师倾向于使用降压策略,但19.7%的参与者在处方PPIs时不知道降压或降压。研究参与者也不太了解药物相互作用与联合施用PPI的概念。结论:在目前的调查研究中,参与者对PPI使用的正确适应症了解较少,因为他们对大多数患者使用PPI而不是任何其他降酸药物。对PPI不良反应、药物相互作用和PPI具体给药方法的了解也不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal
Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
期刊介绍: Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal (BPJ) is an International Peer Reviewed Research Journal in English language whose frequency is quarterly. The journal seeks to promote research, exchange of scientific information, consideration of regulatory mechanisms that affect drug development and utilization, and medical education. BPJ take much care in making your article published without much delay with your kind cooperation and support. Research papers, review articles, short communications, news are welcomed provided they demonstrate new findings of relevance to the field as a whole. All articles will be peer-reviewed and will find a place in Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal based on the merit and innovativeness of the research work. BPJ hopes that Researchers, Research scholars, Academician, Industrialists etc. would make use of this journal for the development of science and technology. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: Biochemistry Genetics Microbiology and virology Molecular, cellular and cancer biology Neurosciences Pharmacology Drug Discovery Cardiovascular Pharmacology Neuropharmacology Molecular & Cellular Mechanisms Immunology & Inflammation Pharmacy.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of the Recovery Profile of Dexmedetomidine When Administered by Different Routes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy – A Randomized Controlled Trial Health Literacy in People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: A Narrative Review Targeted Pharmaceutical Analysis of Antibiotic Use by Risk Criteria in Patients Hospitalized in the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department at Treichville Teaching Hospital (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire) Hybrid Model: Deep Learning method for Early Detection of Alzheimer’s disease from MRI images Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Potential Therapy to Mitigate Severe Covid-19 Manifestations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1