Impact on Psychomotor Functions by Sedative Agents Used During Daycare Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled DoubleBlinded Study of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam Fentanyl

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.13005/bpj/2731
Abhinav Goyal, Garima Bhutani, Meena Singh, Naveen Sharma, Seema Rani, Rahul Saini, Mohd Fazal Ahmed Makki
{"title":"Impact on Psychomotor Functions by Sedative Agents Used During Daycare Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled DoubleBlinded Study of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam Fentanyl","authors":"Abhinav Goyal, Garima Bhutani, Meena Singh, Naveen Sharma, Seema Rani, Rahul Saini, Mohd Fazal Ahmed Makki","doi":"10.13005/bpj/2731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Sedative agents are used during surgeries to reduce stress and anxiety and discomfort of the patient. An ideal sedation agent should provide a rapid onset of action and faster recovery. Almost all commonly used sedative agents in daycare surgeries affect the cognitive and psychomotor functions. The research question of this study was to find out which of the commonly used sedative agents- Dexmedetomidine or Midazolam-Fentanyl combination produces less impact on the psychomotor functions of the patients. Materials and Methods: Seventy two patients who were undergoing tympanoplasty under local anesthesia, were randomly divided into two equal groups - Group D (dexmedetomidine) and Group MF (midazolam and fentanyl) using a computer-based randomization scheme. Group D received dexmedetomidine till an adequate sedation score was achieved (Ramsay sedation scale =3). Group MF patients received midazolam and fentanyl till an adequate sedation score was achieved. Baseline psychomotor assessment and delirium assessment was done 30 minutes prior to the shifting of the patient to operation theatre. All the scores were compared at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours and 8 hours by using MMSE test and stroop color word interference test for psychomotor assessment and short-CAM & Short-CAM severity test for delirium assessment. Statistical analysis was done by applying paired t-test and repeated measure ANOVA for intra-group comparison and for intergroup comparison, independent t-test was applied. Results: There was a significant decline in MMSE score and stroop color word interference score at post-operative period as compared to the baseline values in both the groups up to 4 hours. No such significant difference was seen at 8 hours post-operative period. In both groups, more patients in MF group had mild cognitive dysfunction at 1 hour post-op period, as compared to patient in D group. None of the patients showed severe cognitive impairment. In Group MF, the total number of patients showing signs of delirium was more as compared to group D at Post-op 1 hour. But no signs of delirium were found in any patient in later readings. When presented, the severity of delirium was assessed by Short CAM severity test score. It was observed that all patients who had delirium had CAM severity score of 1 only. Conclusion: The present study concluded that drug dexmedetomidine causes less cognitive decline and less chances of producing post-op delirium as compared to midazolam-fentanyl combination when used for sedation at the time of surgery.","PeriodicalId":9054,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/2731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sedative agents are used during surgeries to reduce stress and anxiety and discomfort of the patient. An ideal sedation agent should provide a rapid onset of action and faster recovery. Almost all commonly used sedative agents in daycare surgeries affect the cognitive and psychomotor functions. The research question of this study was to find out which of the commonly used sedative agents- Dexmedetomidine or Midazolam-Fentanyl combination produces less impact on the psychomotor functions of the patients. Materials and Methods: Seventy two patients who were undergoing tympanoplasty under local anesthesia, were randomly divided into two equal groups - Group D (dexmedetomidine) and Group MF (midazolam and fentanyl) using a computer-based randomization scheme. Group D received dexmedetomidine till an adequate sedation score was achieved (Ramsay sedation scale =3). Group MF patients received midazolam and fentanyl till an adequate sedation score was achieved. Baseline psychomotor assessment and delirium assessment was done 30 minutes prior to the shifting of the patient to operation theatre. All the scores were compared at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours and 8 hours by using MMSE test and stroop color word interference test for psychomotor assessment and short-CAM & Short-CAM severity test for delirium assessment. Statistical analysis was done by applying paired t-test and repeated measure ANOVA for intra-group comparison and for intergroup comparison, independent t-test was applied. Results: There was a significant decline in MMSE score and stroop color word interference score at post-operative period as compared to the baseline values in both the groups up to 4 hours. No such significant difference was seen at 8 hours post-operative period. In both groups, more patients in MF group had mild cognitive dysfunction at 1 hour post-op period, as compared to patient in D group. None of the patients showed severe cognitive impairment. In Group MF, the total number of patients showing signs of delirium was more as compared to group D at Post-op 1 hour. But no signs of delirium were found in any patient in later readings. When presented, the severity of delirium was assessed by Short CAM severity test score. It was observed that all patients who had delirium had CAM severity score of 1 only. Conclusion: The present study concluded that drug dexmedetomidine causes less cognitive decline and less chances of producing post-op delirium as compared to midazolam-fentanyl combination when used for sedation at the time of surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日托手术中使用的镇静剂对精神运动功能的影响:右美托咪定与咪达唑仑芬太尼的随机对照双盲研究
背景:在手术中使用镇静剂来减轻病人的压力、焦虑和不适。一种理想的镇静剂应该提供快速起效和快速恢复。日托手术中常用的镇静药几乎都影响患者的认知和精神运动功能。本研究的研究问题是,在常用的镇静剂中,右美托咪定和咪达唑仑-芬太尼合用哪种对患者精神运动功能的影响更小。材料与方法:72例局部麻醉下行鼓室成形术的患者,采用计算机随机化方法随机分为D组(右美托咪定)和MF组(咪达唑仑和芬太尼)。D组给予右美托咪定,直至达到足够的镇静评分(Ramsay镇静评分=3)。MF组患者接受咪达唑仑和芬太尼治疗,直至达到足够的镇静评分。基线精神运动评估和谵妄评估在患者转移到手术室前30分钟完成。采用MMSE测验、stroop色词干扰测验和短卡姆(short-CAM)在30分钟、1小时、2小时、4小时和8小时进行比较。评估谵妄的Short-CAM严重程度试验。组内比较采用配对t检验和重复测量方差分析,组间比较采用独立t检验。结果:两组术后4小时MMSE评分和stroop color word interference评分较基线值均有显著下降。术后8小时无明显差异。两组术后1小时,MF组患者轻度认知功能障碍发生率均高于D组。没有患者表现出严重的认知障碍。术后1小时,MF组出现谵妄症状的患者总数多于D组。但在后来的读数中,没有发现任何病人有精神错乱的迹象。当出现谵妄严重程度时,用Short CAM严重程度测试评分评估。观察到所有谵妄患者的CAM严重程度评分仅为1。结论:本研究表明,与咪达唑仑-芬太尼联合应用相比,右美托咪定在术中镇静时引起的认知能力下降和术后谵妄发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal
Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
期刊介绍: Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal (BPJ) is an International Peer Reviewed Research Journal in English language whose frequency is quarterly. The journal seeks to promote research, exchange of scientific information, consideration of regulatory mechanisms that affect drug development and utilization, and medical education. BPJ take much care in making your article published without much delay with your kind cooperation and support. Research papers, review articles, short communications, news are welcomed provided they demonstrate new findings of relevance to the field as a whole. All articles will be peer-reviewed and will find a place in Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal based on the merit and innovativeness of the research work. BPJ hopes that Researchers, Research scholars, Academician, Industrialists etc. would make use of this journal for the development of science and technology. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: Biochemistry Genetics Microbiology and virology Molecular, cellular and cancer biology Neurosciences Pharmacology Drug Discovery Cardiovascular Pharmacology Neuropharmacology Molecular & Cellular Mechanisms Immunology & Inflammation Pharmacy.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of the Recovery Profile of Dexmedetomidine When Administered by Different Routes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy – A Randomized Controlled Trial Health Literacy in People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: A Narrative Review Targeted Pharmaceutical Analysis of Antibiotic Use by Risk Criteria in Patients Hospitalized in the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department at Treichville Teaching Hospital (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire) Hybrid Model: Deep Learning method for Early Detection of Alzheimer’s disease from MRI images Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Potential Therapy to Mitigate Severe Covid-19 Manifestations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1