The Significance of Remdesivir and Favipiravir Therapies to Survival of COVID-19 Patients

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.13005/bpj/2729
Maysaa K. Al-Malkey, Sinai W. Mohammed, Noorulhuda F Khalaf, Mohammed J. Al-Obaidi, Fadhaa O. Sameer
{"title":"The Significance of Remdesivir and Favipiravir Therapies to Survival of COVID-19 Patients","authors":"Maysaa K. Al-Malkey, Sinai W. Mohammed, Noorulhuda F Khalaf, Mohammed J. Al-Obaidi, Fadhaa O. Sameer","doi":"10.13005/bpj/2729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the infection escalation around the globe encourage the implementation of the global protocol for standard care patients aiming to cease the infection spread. Evaluating the potency of these therapy courses has drawn particular attention in health practice. This observational study aimed to assess the efficacy of Remdesivir and Favipiravir drugs compared to the standard care patients in COVID-19 confirmed patients. One hundred twenty-seven patients showed the disease at different stages, and one hundred and fifty patients received only standard care as a control group were included in this study. Patients under the Remdesivir therapy protocol were (62.20%); meanwhile, there (30.71%) were under Favipiravir therapy. From the total number of patients under both protocols, 75.6% of the total patients recovered, and 15.7% were deceased. The mortality rate was shown to be 14 out of 64 patients (22%) in critical COVID-19 patients in the Remdesivir group and 3 out of 37 patients (8%) in the Favipiravir group. Remdesivir drug lowered healing mean time to 6 days in mild-to-moderate. COVID-19 clinical manifestations are different among infected patients, and the therapy required to be carefully designed for critical cases in particular. Remdesivir and Favipiravir therapy tend to have a promising efficacy in reducing the mortality rate and time of recovery, especially among mild-to-moderate patients.","PeriodicalId":9054,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/2729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the infection escalation around the globe encourage the implementation of the global protocol for standard care patients aiming to cease the infection spread. Evaluating the potency of these therapy courses has drawn particular attention in health practice. This observational study aimed to assess the efficacy of Remdesivir and Favipiravir drugs compared to the standard care patients in COVID-19 confirmed patients. One hundred twenty-seven patients showed the disease at different stages, and one hundred and fifty patients received only standard care as a control group were included in this study. Patients under the Remdesivir therapy protocol were (62.20%); meanwhile, there (30.71%) were under Favipiravir therapy. From the total number of patients under both protocols, 75.6% of the total patients recovered, and 15.7% were deceased. The mortality rate was shown to be 14 out of 64 patients (22%) in critical COVID-19 patients in the Remdesivir group and 3 out of 37 patients (8%) in the Favipiravir group. Remdesivir drug lowered healing mean time to 6 days in mild-to-moderate. COVID-19 clinical manifestations are different among infected patients, and the therapy required to be carefully designed for critical cases in particular. Remdesivir and Favipiravir therapy tend to have a promising efficacy in reducing the mortality rate and time of recovery, especially among mild-to-moderate patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞德西韦和法匹拉韦治疗对COVID-19患者生存的意义
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行和全球感染升级促使实施旨在阻止感染传播的全球标准护理患者方案。评估这些治疗方案的效力在卫生实践中引起了特别的注意。本观察性研究旨在评估Remdesivir和Favipiravir药物与标准治疗患者在COVID-19确诊患者中的疗效。127名患者在不同阶段表现出疾病,150名患者仅接受标准治疗作为对照组纳入本研究。采用瑞德西韦治疗方案的患者为(62.20%);同时,接受法匹拉韦治疗的占30.71%。从两种方案下的患者总数来看,75.6%的患者康复,15.7%的患者死亡。在新冠肺炎危重患者中,瑞德西韦组64例患者中有14例(22%)死亡,而法维吡拉韦组37例患者中有3例(8%)死亡。瑞德西韦将轻至中度患者的平均愈合时间缩短至6天。新冠肺炎患者的临床表现各不相同,特别是危重病例,需要精心设计治疗方案。Remdesivir和Favipiravir治疗在降低死亡率和恢复时间方面有很好的疗效,特别是在轻中度患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal
Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
期刊介绍: Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal (BPJ) is an International Peer Reviewed Research Journal in English language whose frequency is quarterly. The journal seeks to promote research, exchange of scientific information, consideration of regulatory mechanisms that affect drug development and utilization, and medical education. BPJ take much care in making your article published without much delay with your kind cooperation and support. Research papers, review articles, short communications, news are welcomed provided they demonstrate new findings of relevance to the field as a whole. All articles will be peer-reviewed and will find a place in Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal based on the merit and innovativeness of the research work. BPJ hopes that Researchers, Research scholars, Academician, Industrialists etc. would make use of this journal for the development of science and technology. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: Biochemistry Genetics Microbiology and virology Molecular, cellular and cancer biology Neurosciences Pharmacology Drug Discovery Cardiovascular Pharmacology Neuropharmacology Molecular & Cellular Mechanisms Immunology & Inflammation Pharmacy.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of the Recovery Profile of Dexmedetomidine When Administered by Different Routes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy – A Randomized Controlled Trial Health Literacy in People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: A Narrative Review Targeted Pharmaceutical Analysis of Antibiotic Use by Risk Criteria in Patients Hospitalized in the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department at Treichville Teaching Hospital (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire) Hybrid Model: Deep Learning method for Early Detection of Alzheimer’s disease from MRI images Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Potential Therapy to Mitigate Severe Covid-19 Manifestations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1