Determination of caffeine in Robusta coffee beans with different roasting method using UV-Vis spectrophotometry

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Food Research Pub Date : 2023-11-12 DOI:10.26656/fr.2017.7(6).1006
B.R.P. Ihsan, A.F. Shalas, Elisabeth Y., Claudia L.M., A.R. Putri
{"title":"Determination of caffeine in Robusta coffee beans with different roasting method using UV-Vis spectrophotometry","authors":"B.R.P. Ihsan, A.F. Shalas, Elisabeth Y., Claudia L.M., A.R. Putri","doi":"10.26656/fr.2017.7(6).1006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caffeine is one of the substances in coffee. Several factors affect the caffeine content in coffee, such as harvesting, post-harvesting, roasting, drying, and storage. This study aimed to compare the roasting methods to caffeine content from two samples of robusta coffee beans (from two different areas in east Java, Indonesia) and determine the caffeine using UV-Vis spectrophotometry. Light (180°C), medium (210°C), and dark (240°C) roast profiles were used. This method was validated pertaining to linearity, precision and accuracy studies, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ). The result of the validation method showed the specificity of caffeine in coffee with dichloromethane as solvent at a Wavelength of 275 nm. The linearity showed linear results at a concentration of 5-40 ppm. The linear correlation coefficient (r2 ) was 0.9997. The LOD and LOQ were 0.57 ppm and 1.90 ppm, respectively. The accuracy method showed % recovery in the range of 97.9-99.6%. The precision results showed % relative standard deviation of between 0.9-1.0%. The result showed that the highest caffeine content was found in the light roast profile up to 8%. Based on the statistical test, there is no difference in caffeine content between the two samples (p>0.05). In conclusion, the different roasting methods affect the caffeine content (p<0.05). The caffeine content will decrease as the roasting temperature increases. The method was established to be simple, linear, precise, accurate as well as sensitive and can be applied to determining the caffeine content in coffee.","PeriodicalId":12410,"journal":{"name":"Food Research","volume":"71 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.7(6).1006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caffeine is one of the substances in coffee. Several factors affect the caffeine content in coffee, such as harvesting, post-harvesting, roasting, drying, and storage. This study aimed to compare the roasting methods to caffeine content from two samples of robusta coffee beans (from two different areas in east Java, Indonesia) and determine the caffeine using UV-Vis spectrophotometry. Light (180°C), medium (210°C), and dark (240°C) roast profiles were used. This method was validated pertaining to linearity, precision and accuracy studies, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ). The result of the validation method showed the specificity of caffeine in coffee with dichloromethane as solvent at a Wavelength of 275 nm. The linearity showed linear results at a concentration of 5-40 ppm. The linear correlation coefficient (r2 ) was 0.9997. The LOD and LOQ were 0.57 ppm and 1.90 ppm, respectively. The accuracy method showed % recovery in the range of 97.9-99.6%. The precision results showed % relative standard deviation of between 0.9-1.0%. The result showed that the highest caffeine content was found in the light roast profile up to 8%. Based on the statistical test, there is no difference in caffeine content between the two samples (p>0.05). In conclusion, the different roasting methods affect the caffeine content (p<0.05). The caffeine content will decrease as the roasting temperature increases. The method was established to be simple, linear, precise, accurate as well as sensitive and can be applied to determining the caffeine content in coffee.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紫外可见分光光度法测定罗布斯塔咖啡豆中不同烘焙方法的咖啡因含量
咖啡因是咖啡中的一种物质。有几个因素会影响咖啡中的咖啡因含量,如采收、采收后、烘烤、干燥和储存。本研究旨在比较两种罗布斯塔咖啡豆样品(来自印度尼西亚东爪哇的两个不同地区)的烘焙方法对咖啡因含量的影响,并使用紫外可见分光光度法测定咖啡因含量。使用轻度(180°C),中度(210°C)和深色(240°C)烘烤剖面。对该方法进行了线性度、精密度和准确度研究、检出限和定量限的验证。结果表明,以二氯甲烷为溶剂的咖啡中咖啡因在275 nm波长处具有特异性。线性关系在浓度为5- 40ppm时呈线性关系。线性相关系数(r2)为0.9997。LOD和LOQ分别为0.57 ppm和1.90 ppm。准确度在97.9 ~ 99.6%范围内。精密度的相对标准偏差在0.9 ~ 1.0%之间。结果表明,在轻度烘焙中,咖啡因含量最高,达到8%。经统计检验,两种样品的咖啡因含量无差异(p>0.05)。综上所述,不同的焙烧方式对咖啡因含量有影响(p<0.05)。咖啡因含量随着焙烧温度的升高而降低。该方法简便、线性、精密度高、准确度高、灵敏度高,可用于咖啡中咖啡因含量的测定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Research
Food Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of genetic disclosure on SNPs rs1761667, rs8065080, and rs662799 on the limitation of salt and fat intake Volatile compounds of Croatian cheese in a lamb skin sack prepared from a mixture of goat's and cow's milk Carica pubescens fruit juice improved superoxide dismutase, triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus Wistar rats Nutritional profile and physicochemical analysis of two indigenous cultivars of black cumin (Nigella sativa) seeds and oil in Bangladesh Co-occurrence and exposure assessment of deoxynivalenol and fumonisins from maize and maize-based products in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1