Radical Methodological Openness and Method as Politics: Reflections on Militant Research with Squatters in Catalonia

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Antipode Pub Date : 2023-11-12 DOI:10.1111/anti.12993
Mara Ferreri, Melissa García-Lamarca, Obra Social Barcelona
{"title":"Radical Methodological Openness and Method as Politics: Reflections on Militant Research with Squatters in Catalonia","authors":"Mara Ferreri,&nbsp;Melissa García-Lamarca,&nbsp;Obra Social Barcelona","doi":"10.1111/anti.12993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2017, it was estimated that over 87,000 families—around 270,000 people—lived in squatted properties in Spain. Such figures, often used by the media to stigmatise residential occupations and generate moral panic, give an ill-defined yet powerful indication of the prevalence of squatting within and outside organised housing movements. From these came the question: How to elevate the “minor knowledges” of precariously housed people in an ethical, engaged, and situated way, in dialogue with a coordinated activist push to reframe squatting as a political strategy? Based on the experience of the first “strategic positivist” survey about squatting in Catalonia, we offer a situated reflection on the tensions and contradictions of militant research in a shifting political terrain. The urgency and ethics that guided our process made it necessary to operate through methodological openness and to consider method as politics, advancing a broader agenda of movement-relevant research supporting non-speculative forms of inhabitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":"56 2","pages":"469-491"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anti.12993","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.12993","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2017, it was estimated that over 87,000 families—around 270,000 people—lived in squatted properties in Spain. Such figures, often used by the media to stigmatise residential occupations and generate moral panic, give an ill-defined yet powerful indication of the prevalence of squatting within and outside organised housing movements. From these came the question: How to elevate the “minor knowledges” of precariously housed people in an ethical, engaged, and situated way, in dialogue with a coordinated activist push to reframe squatting as a political strategy? Based on the experience of the first “strategic positivist” survey about squatting in Catalonia, we offer a situated reflection on the tensions and contradictions of militant research in a shifting political terrain. The urgency and ethics that guided our process made it necessary to operate through methodological openness and to consider method as politics, advancing a broader agenda of movement-relevant research supporting non-speculative forms of inhabitation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激进的方法论开放和作为政治的方法:对加泰罗尼亚棚户区激进研究的思考
据估计,2017年西班牙有超过8.7万个家庭(约27万人)居住在擅自占用的房产中。这些数字经常被媒体用来丑化住宅占用行为,并引发道德恐慌,它们以不明确的方式却有力地说明了在有组织的住房运动内外,蹲守活动的普遍性。由此产生了一个问题:如何以一种道德的、参与的和情景化的方式,在与活动家的对话中,提升岌岌可危的居住者的 "小知识",将蹲点活动重新定义为一种政治策略?基于首次对加泰罗尼亚地区擅自占地行为进行 "战略实证主义 "调查的经验,我们对在不断变化的政治环境中开展激进研究的紧张和矛盾进行了情景反思。指导我们工作的紧迫性和伦理道德使我们有必要通过方法论的开放性来开展工作,并将方法视为政治,从而推进更广泛的运动相关研究议程,支持非具体的居住形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antipode
Antipode GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Referees, July 2023–June 2024 Offshore Citizenship: “Diversified Citizenship Portfolios” and the Regulatory Arbitrage of Global Wealth Elites Resisting Post-Political Adaptation to Climate Change: How a Small Community Stood Up to Big Development Sports Cages as Social Infrastructure: Sociality, Context, and Contest in Hackney's Cages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1