Language diversity, gender inequality, and aggregate productivity in Canada

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Scottish Journal of Political Economy Pub Date : 2023-11-12 DOI:10.1111/sjpe.12372
Kanat Abdulla
{"title":"Language diversity, gender inequality, and aggregate productivity in Canada","authors":"Kanat Abdulla","doi":"10.1111/sjpe.12372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Identifying sources of barriers to occupational mobility is central to evaluating the efficiency of the labor market. In this paper, we present an augmented Roy model in which workers self‐select into occupations, subject to labor market barriers that are specific to their socio‐linguistic group. Our findings provide evidence of differences in labor market outcomes across gender and linguistic groups in Canada. We argue that these differences could be attributed to barriers to labor mobility and that the reduction of these disparities would result in higher aggregate productivity in the country. In the augmented Roy model, the frictions result in inefficient allocation of labor across occupations. The study quantifies the change in aggregate productivity that would result from reducing the friction. The elimination of the frictions increased aggregate output on average by 6.2% and 4.4% in 1991 and 2011, respectively. This finding highlights the importance of reducing language barriers and gender inequality in the labor market. We provide policy recommendations for mitigating the disparities in socioeconomic outcomes between gender and linguistic groups.","PeriodicalId":47171,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Journal of Political Economy","volume":"8 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Journal of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Identifying sources of barriers to occupational mobility is central to evaluating the efficiency of the labor market. In this paper, we present an augmented Roy model in which workers self‐select into occupations, subject to labor market barriers that are specific to their socio‐linguistic group. Our findings provide evidence of differences in labor market outcomes across gender and linguistic groups in Canada. We argue that these differences could be attributed to barriers to labor mobility and that the reduction of these disparities would result in higher aggregate productivity in the country. In the augmented Roy model, the frictions result in inefficient allocation of labor across occupations. The study quantifies the change in aggregate productivity that would result from reducing the friction. The elimination of the frictions increased aggregate output on average by 6.2% and 4.4% in 1991 and 2011, respectively. This finding highlights the importance of reducing language barriers and gender inequality in the labor market. We provide policy recommendations for mitigating the disparities in socioeconomic outcomes between gender and linguistic groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大的语言多样性、性别不平等和总生产力
识别职业流动障碍的来源是评估劳动力市场效率的核心。在本文中,我们提出了一个增强的罗伊模型,在这个模型中,工人自我选择职业,受到劳动力市场障碍的影响,这些障碍是特定于他们的社会语言群体的。我们的研究结果为加拿大不同性别和语言群体的劳动力市场结果差异提供了证据。我们认为,这些差异可能归因于劳动力流动的障碍,而这些差异的减少将导致该国总生产率的提高。在增强的罗伊模型中,摩擦导致劳动力在不同职业之间的低效配置。该研究量化了减少摩擦所带来的总生产率变化。摩擦的消除使1991年和2011年的总产出平均分别增长6.2%和4.4%。这一发现强调了减少劳动力市场中的语言障碍和性别不平等的重要性。我们提供政策建议,以减轻性别和语言群体之间的社会经济结果差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Scottish Journal of Political Economy is a generalist journal with an explicitly international reach in both readership and authorship. It is dedicated to publishing the highest quality research in any field of economics, without prejudice to the methodology or to the analytical techniques used. The editors encourage submissions in all fields of economics in order to provide practical contributions to the literature, and to further the influence of economics in the world of practical affairs.
期刊最新文献
Corporate influence, conservative “model bills,” and state economic outcomes Does regime type matter for economic institutions in non‐democracies? The effect of inter vivos gift taxation on wealth inequality and economic growth Nonlinear effects of uncertainty shocks: State dependency and asymmetry Did dollarization help Ecuador?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1