Reinforcement of columns using different composite materials

Galina E. Okolnikova, Svetlana B. Strashnova, Sikhanyisiwe Mercy Mabhena, Stanislav V. Strashnov
{"title":"Reinforcement of columns using different composite materials","authors":"Galina E. Okolnikova, Svetlana B. Strashnova, Sikhanyisiwe Mercy Mabhena, Stanislav V. Strashnov","doi":"10.22363/1815-5235-2023-19-3-322-328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption in construction of composite materials made by combining two or more materials to produce a material with improved properties over the separate components has been steadily increasing over the past decades. In the past few years there have been advances in composite manufacturing technology, increased demand for sustainable and eco-friendly building materials, and the need for materials that are lightweight and easy for transportation. For these reason, architects and civil engineers incorporate composites into structural elements to achieve these desired goals and optimize the cost of construction. One of the most common composite materials that was introduced to the industry is fiber reinforced polymer (FRP), produced by combining fibers (carbon, glass, or aramid) with a polymer matrix (epoxy or polyester). FRP materials are lightweight, durable and corrosion resistant, which makes them ideal for use in a wide range of construction applications. This study aims to propose a comparison between four different methods as a viable solution to strengthen and reinforce column structures. The structural behavior of three different composite materials was investigated. One traditional concrete-steel column was tested in the experiment for comparison. The other three columns were reinforced using carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP), glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) and stainless steel respectively. The obtained experimental results were analyzed, and comparison of three different systems of reinforcement for strengthening columns with composite materials was performed.","PeriodicalId":32610,"journal":{"name":"Structural Mechanics of Engineering Constructions and Buildings","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Mechanics of Engineering Constructions and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/1815-5235-2023-19-3-322-328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adoption in construction of composite materials made by combining two or more materials to produce a material with improved properties over the separate components has been steadily increasing over the past decades. In the past few years there have been advances in composite manufacturing technology, increased demand for sustainable and eco-friendly building materials, and the need for materials that are lightweight and easy for transportation. For these reason, architects and civil engineers incorporate composites into structural elements to achieve these desired goals and optimize the cost of construction. One of the most common composite materials that was introduced to the industry is fiber reinforced polymer (FRP), produced by combining fibers (carbon, glass, or aramid) with a polymer matrix (epoxy or polyester). FRP materials are lightweight, durable and corrosion resistant, which makes them ideal for use in a wide range of construction applications. This study aims to propose a comparison between four different methods as a viable solution to strengthen and reinforce column structures. The structural behavior of three different composite materials was investigated. One traditional concrete-steel column was tested in the experiment for comparison. The other three columns were reinforced using carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP), glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) and stainless steel respectively. The obtained experimental results were analyzed, and comparison of three different systems of reinforcement for strengthening columns with composite materials was performed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用不同的复合材料加固柱子
在过去的几十年里,通过结合两种或两种以上的材料来生产一种比单独成分性能更好的材料的复合材料在建筑中的应用一直在稳步增长。在过去的几年里,复合材料制造技术取得了进步,对可持续和环保建筑材料的需求增加,以及对轻质和易于运输的材料的需求。由于这些原因,建筑师和土木工程师将复合材料纳入结构元素,以实现这些预期目标并优化施工成本。引入工业的最常见的复合材料之一是纤维增强聚合物(FRP),它是由纤维(碳、玻璃或芳纶)与聚合物基体(环氧树脂或聚酯)结合而成的。FRP材料重量轻,耐用,耐腐蚀,这使得它们非常适合用于广泛的建筑应用。本研究的目的是提出四种不同的方法之间的比较,作为一个可行的解决方案,以加强和加固柱结构。研究了三种不同复合材料的结构行为。对一种传统的混凝土-钢柱进行了对比试验。其余三根柱分别采用碳纤维增强塑料(CFRP)、玻璃纤维增强塑料(GFRP)和不锈钢进行加固。对得到的试验结果进行了分析,并对三种不同的复合材料加固体系进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optimal Duration of Observations During Seismic Inspection of Buildings Effect of Sinusoidal Fiber Waviness on Non-Linear Dynamic Performance of Laminated Composite Plates with Variable Fiber Spacing Deformation of Cylindrical Shell Made of 9X2 Steel Under Complex Loading Parameterization of Maxwell - Cremona Diagram for Determining Forces in Elements of a Scissors Truss Geometric Investigation of Three Thin Shells with Ruled Middle Surfaces with the Same Main Frame
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1