A Multimodal Approach to Investigate the Role of Cognitive Workload and User Interfaces in Human-robot Collaboration

Apostolos Kalatzis, Saidur Rahman, Vishnunarayan Girishan Prabhu, Laura Stanley, Mike Wittie
{"title":"A Multimodal Approach to Investigate the Role of Cognitive Workload and User Interfaces in Human-robot Collaboration","authors":"Apostolos Kalatzis, Saidur Rahman, Vishnunarayan Girishan Prabhu, Laura Stanley, Mike Wittie","doi":"10.1145/3577190.3614112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the primary aims of Industry 5.0 is to refine the interaction between humans, machines, and robots by developing human-centered design solutions to enhance Human-Robot Collaboration, performance, trust, and safety. This research investigated how deploying a user interface utilizing a 2-D and 3-D display affects participants’ cognitive effort, task performance, trust, and situational awareness while performing a collaborative task using a robot. The study used a within-subject design where fifteen participants were subjected to three conditions: no interface, display User Interface, and mixed reality User Interface where vision assistance was provided. Participants performed a pick-and-place task with a robot in each condition under two levels of cognitive workload (i.e., high and low). The cognitive workload was measured using subjective (i.e., NASA TLX) and objective measures (i.e., heart rate variability). Additionally, task performance, situation awareness, and trust when using these interfaces were measured to understand the impact of different user interfaces during a Human-Robot Collaboration task. Findings from this study indicated that cognitive workload and user interfaces impacted task performance, where a significant decrease in efficiency and accuracy was observed while using the mixed reality interface. Additionally, irrespective of the three conditions, all participants perceived the task as more cognitively demanding during the high cognitive workload session. However, no significant differences across the interfaces were observed. Finally, cognitive workload impacted situational awareness and trust, where lower levels were reported in the high cognitive workload session, and the lowest levels were observed under the mixed reality user interface condition.","PeriodicalId":93171,"journal":{"name":"Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3577190.3614112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the primary aims of Industry 5.0 is to refine the interaction between humans, machines, and robots by developing human-centered design solutions to enhance Human-Robot Collaboration, performance, trust, and safety. This research investigated how deploying a user interface utilizing a 2-D and 3-D display affects participants’ cognitive effort, task performance, trust, and situational awareness while performing a collaborative task using a robot. The study used a within-subject design where fifteen participants were subjected to three conditions: no interface, display User Interface, and mixed reality User Interface where vision assistance was provided. Participants performed a pick-and-place task with a robot in each condition under two levels of cognitive workload (i.e., high and low). The cognitive workload was measured using subjective (i.e., NASA TLX) and objective measures (i.e., heart rate variability). Additionally, task performance, situation awareness, and trust when using these interfaces were measured to understand the impact of different user interfaces during a Human-Robot Collaboration task. Findings from this study indicated that cognitive workload and user interfaces impacted task performance, where a significant decrease in efficiency and accuracy was observed while using the mixed reality interface. Additionally, irrespective of the three conditions, all participants perceived the task as more cognitively demanding during the high cognitive workload session. However, no significant differences across the interfaces were observed. Finally, cognitive workload impacted situational awareness and trust, where lower levels were reported in the high cognitive workload session, and the lowest levels were observed under the mixed reality user interface condition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多模态方法研究认知负荷和用户界面在人机协作中的作用
工业5.0的主要目标之一是通过开发以人为中心的设计解决方案来改进人、机器和机器人之间的交互,以增强人与机器人之间的协作、性能、信任和安全性。本研究调查了使用2-D和3-D显示的用户界面如何影响参与者在使用机器人执行协作任务时的认知努力、任务绩效、信任和态势感知。该研究采用了主题内设计,15名参与者受到三种条件的影响:无界面、显示用户界面和提供视觉辅助的混合现实用户界面。在两种认知负荷水平(即高负荷和低负荷)下,参与者在每个条件下与机器人一起执行拾取和放置任务。认知负荷测量采用主观测量(即NASA TLX)和客观测量(即心率变异性)。此外,还测量了使用这些界面时的任务性能、情况感知和信任,以了解在人机协作任务期间不同用户界面的影响。本研究的结果表明,认知工作量和用户界面影响任务性能,其中使用混合现实界面时观察到效率和准确性显着下降。此外,无论在这三种情况下,所有参与者都认为在高认知负荷阶段,任务的认知要求更高。然而,在不同的界面上没有观察到显著的差异。最后,认知工作量对情境感知和信任有影响,高认知工作量的情境感知和信任水平较低,混合现实用户界面的情境感知和信任水平最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gesture Motion Graphs for Few-Shot Speech-Driven Gesture Reenactment The UEA Digital Humans entry to the GENEA Challenge 2023 Deciphering Entrepreneurial Pitches: A Multimodal Deep Learning Approach to Predict Probability of Investment The FineMotion entry to the GENEA Challenge 2023: DeepPhase for conversational gestures generation FEIN-Z: Autoregressive Behavior Cloning for Speech-Driven Gesture Generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1