Using Speech Patterns to Model the Dimensions of Teamness in Human-Agent Teams

Emily Doherty, Cara A Spencer, Lucca Eloy, Nitin Kumar, Rachel Dickler, Leanne Hirshfield
{"title":"Using Speech Patterns to Model the Dimensions of Teamness in Human-Agent Teams","authors":"Emily Doherty, Cara A Spencer, Lucca Eloy, Nitin Kumar, Rachel Dickler, Leanne Hirshfield","doi":"10.1145/3577190.3614121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teamness is a newly proposed multidimensional construct aimed to characterize teams and their dynamic levels of interdependence over time. Specifically, teamness is deeply rooted in team cognition literature, considering how a team’s composition, processes, states, and actions affect collaboration. With this multifaceted construct being recently proposed, there is a call to the research community to investigate, measure, and model dimensions of teamness. In this study, we explored the speech content of 21 human-human-agent teams during a remote collaborative search task. Using self-report surveys of their social and affective states throughout the task, we conducted factor analysis to condense the survey measures into four components closely aligned with the dimensions outlined in the teamness framework: social dynamics and trust, affect, cognitive load, and interpersonal reliance. We then extracted features from teams’ speech using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) and performed Epistemic Network Analyses (ENA) across these four teamwork components as well as team performance. We developed six hypotheses of how we expected specific LIWC features to correlate with self-reported team processes and performance, which we investigated through our ENA analyses. Through quantitative and qualitative analyses of the networks, we explore differences of speech patterns across the four components and relate these findings to the dimensions of teamness. Our results indicate that ENA models based on selected LIWC features were able to capture elements of teamness as well as team performance; this technique therefore shows promise for modeling of these states during CSCW, to ultimately design intelligent systems to promote greater teamness using speech-based measures.","PeriodicalId":93171,"journal":{"name":"Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3577190.3614121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teamness is a newly proposed multidimensional construct aimed to characterize teams and their dynamic levels of interdependence over time. Specifically, teamness is deeply rooted in team cognition literature, considering how a team’s composition, processes, states, and actions affect collaboration. With this multifaceted construct being recently proposed, there is a call to the research community to investigate, measure, and model dimensions of teamness. In this study, we explored the speech content of 21 human-human-agent teams during a remote collaborative search task. Using self-report surveys of their social and affective states throughout the task, we conducted factor analysis to condense the survey measures into four components closely aligned with the dimensions outlined in the teamness framework: social dynamics and trust, affect, cognitive load, and interpersonal reliance. We then extracted features from teams’ speech using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) and performed Epistemic Network Analyses (ENA) across these four teamwork components as well as team performance. We developed six hypotheses of how we expected specific LIWC features to correlate with self-reported team processes and performance, which we investigated through our ENA analyses. Through quantitative and qualitative analyses of the networks, we explore differences of speech patterns across the four components and relate these findings to the dimensions of teamness. Our results indicate that ENA models based on selected LIWC features were able to capture elements of teamness as well as team performance; this technique therefore shows promise for modeling of these states during CSCW, to ultimately design intelligent systems to promote greater teamness using speech-based measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于语音模式的人- agent团队合作维度建模
团队性是一个新提出的多维结构,旨在描述团队及其随时间的动态相互依赖水平。具体来说,团队精神深深植根于团队认知文献,考虑到团队的组成、过程、状态和行动如何影响协作。随着这个多面结构最近被提出,有一个呼吁研究界调查、测量和建模团队的维度。在这项研究中,我们探索了21个人-人-智能体团队在远程协同搜索任务中的语音内容。通过在整个任务过程中对他们的社会和情感状态进行自我报告调查,我们进行了因素分析,将调查措施浓缩为与团队框架中概述的维度密切相关的四个组成部分:社会动态和信任、影响、认知负荷和人际依赖。然后,我们使用语言调查和单词计数(LIWC)从团队演讲中提取特征,并对这四个团队合作组成部分以及团队绩效进行认知网络分析(ENA)。我们通过ENA分析研究了特定LIWC特征与自我报告的团队流程和绩效之间的关系,并提出了六个假设。通过对网络的定量和定性分析,我们探索了四个组成部分之间的语音模式差异,并将这些发现与团队性维度联系起来。我们的研究结果表明,基于选定的LIWC特征的ENA模型能够捕获团队性和团队绩效的元素;因此,该技术有望在CSCW期间对这些状态进行建模,最终设计出使用基于语音的措施来促进更大团队合作的智能系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gesture Motion Graphs for Few-Shot Speech-Driven Gesture Reenactment The UEA Digital Humans entry to the GENEA Challenge 2023 Deciphering Entrepreneurial Pitches: A Multimodal Deep Learning Approach to Predict Probability of Investment The FineMotion entry to the GENEA Challenge 2023: DeepPhase for conversational gestures generation FEIN-Z: Autoregressive Behavior Cloning for Speech-Driven Gesture Generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1