Penetapan Alam Sebagai Subjek Hukum

Miftakhul Shodikin
{"title":"Penetapan Alam Sebagai Subjek Hukum","authors":"Miftakhul Shodikin","doi":"10.59066/jmi.v2i1.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Legal subjects who are believed to be the holders of rights and obligations in fact, over time always experience expansion or development. After women were recognized as having legal status and corporations as non-human legal subjects, a new legal subject emerged, namely: nature. Ecuador gave the rights to nature that were embedded in the 2008 constitutional amendments, the Whanganui River in New Zealand was recognized as a legal subject with representatives of the Maori tribe, and the Ganges and Yamuna Rivers and their attributes through a decision in HC Uttarakhand India established them as legal subjects. These three legal precedents are important breakthroughs in the concept of \"legal entity\". Apart from that, it is also an alternative to the stalemate problem of natural destruction and environmental crisis, so that with this the determination of nature as a legal subject cannot be avoided. Purpose: Research with the aim of knowing how to determine nature as a legal subject. Where this writing should be able to contribute to the uniqueness of the science of law especially in international law moreover this research can also contribute ideas so that it can become input and/or reference for practitioners, and public officials in decision-making, environmental activists, and all human beings who care for the balance of nature. Design/Methodology/Approach: This legal research is normative legal research. The approach used is a statute approach, a case approach, and a comparative approach. Findings: Based on historical facts, the subject of law has always been and will continue to experience expansion. After women and corporations were recognized as legal subjects several decades ago, it is now nature's turn to gain recognition as an entity holding rights and obligations. This is due to a paradigm shift in the relationship between humans and nature. The view of humans as the center of nature \"anthropocentrism\" is replaced with a view of deep ecology represented by ecocentrism and biocentrism environmental ethics. In essence, this view leads to the recognition of equality for every living thing or ecological justice. Originality/Value: There is no research that discusses nature as a legal subject, so this is new research.","PeriodicalId":152825,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59066/jmi.v2i1.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Legal subjects who are believed to be the holders of rights and obligations in fact, over time always experience expansion or development. After women were recognized as having legal status and corporations as non-human legal subjects, a new legal subject emerged, namely: nature. Ecuador gave the rights to nature that were embedded in the 2008 constitutional amendments, the Whanganui River in New Zealand was recognized as a legal subject with representatives of the Maori tribe, and the Ganges and Yamuna Rivers and their attributes through a decision in HC Uttarakhand India established them as legal subjects. These three legal precedents are important breakthroughs in the concept of "legal entity". Apart from that, it is also an alternative to the stalemate problem of natural destruction and environmental crisis, so that with this the determination of nature as a legal subject cannot be avoided. Purpose: Research with the aim of knowing how to determine nature as a legal subject. Where this writing should be able to contribute to the uniqueness of the science of law especially in international law moreover this research can also contribute ideas so that it can become input and/or reference for practitioners, and public officials in decision-making, environmental activists, and all human beings who care for the balance of nature. Design/Methodology/Approach: This legal research is normative legal research. The approach used is a statute approach, a case approach, and a comparative approach. Findings: Based on historical facts, the subject of law has always been and will continue to experience expansion. After women and corporations were recognized as legal subjects several decades ago, it is now nature's turn to gain recognition as an entity holding rights and obligations. This is due to a paradigm shift in the relationship between humans and nature. The view of humans as the center of nature "anthropocentrism" is replaced with a view of deep ecology represented by ecocentrism and biocentrism environmental ethics. In essence, this view leads to the recognition of equality for every living thing or ecological justice. Originality/Value: There is no research that discusses nature as a legal subject, so this is new research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
把自然选择作为一个法律主题
摘要:法律主体被认为是权利和义务的主体,其本质上是随着时间的推移而扩展或发展的。在承认妇女的法律地位和公司作为非人类的法律主体之后,出现了一个新的法律主体,即自然。厄瓜多尔在2008年的宪法修正案中赋予了自然权利,新西兰的旺格努伊河被毛利部落的代表承认为法律主体,恒河和亚穆纳河及其属性通过北阿坎德邦高等法院的决定被印度确定为法律主体。这三个判例是对“法人实体”概念的重要突破。除此之外,它也是对自然破坏和环境危机的僵局问题的一种替代,因此,自然作为法律主体的确定是不可避免的。目的:以了解如何确定自然作为法律主体为目的进行研究。这篇文章应该能够为法律科学的独特性做出贡献,特别是在国际法方面,此外,这项研究也可以提供一些想法,这样它就可以成为从业者的输入和/或参考,决策中的公职人员,环境活动家,以及所有关心自然平衡的人。设计/方法/途径:本法律研究属于规范性法律研究。所使用的方法是成文法方法、案例方法和比较方法。研究发现:基于历史事实,法律的主体一直并将继续经历扩张。在几十年前妇女和公司被承认为法律主体之后,现在轮到自然作为拥有权利和义务的实体获得承认。这是由于人类与自然之间关系的范式转变。以生态中心主义和生物中心主义为代表的深层生态学观点取代了“人类中心主义”的自然中心观。从本质上讲,这种观点导致了对所有生物平等或生态正义的承认。原创性/价值:没有研究将自然作为一个法律主体来讨论,所以这是一个新的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perspektif dan Langkah Politik Penyelesaian Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Politik Hukum Pengalokasian Program Padat Karya Dengan Menggunakan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah di Kota Surabaya Akibat Hukum atas Alokasi Anggaran Pendidikan yang Kurang dari 20% Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah Patronase Politik: Respon Bisnis Terhadap Program Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Principle of Original Authority In Territorial Decentralization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1