Flora Tristan by Brigitte Krulic (review)

{"title":"Flora Tristan by Brigitte Krulic (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/wfs.2023.a909488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Flora Tristan by Brigitte Krulic Nadia Margolis Krulic, Brigitte. Flora Tristan. Gallimard, 2022. Pp. 380. ISBN 978-2-07-282022-9. 21.50€ (paper). First-time readers of Flora Tristan (1803-1844) often tend to ask the same question: why have we not heard more about her sooner? For indeed, she was one of those extraordinarily accomplished women authors who were so ahead of their time that, despite recognition by their contemporaries, they ended up forgotten shortly after their deaths. Fortunately, scholars and activists of congruent ideological agendas to theirs (as in 1968) finally discovered and evoked them as presaging voices from the past, yet still not engagingly enough for recognition by the general public, even though Tristan's life reads like a romantic novel, as surrealist André Breton and others would later observe. Brigitte Krulic offers the most complete, rigorous yet readable, up-to-date appraisal of Flora Tristan's place [End Page 155] in women's history and European social history in general. Interwoven within her biography, Krulic's main arguments and elucidations are discussed below. Tristan's pervasive self-image as \"pariah\" first relates to her early childhood as an orphaned bastard child: born to a Creole aristocratic Peruvian father and bourgeois Parisian mother married in a Catholic (but not civil) wedding, she led an impoverished childhood with her mother in Paris after her father died when she was four. Her situation forced her into an unhappy early marriage to her boss, Chazal, with whom she had three children (the third, Aline, would become mother to the celebrated, if hardly feminist, artist Paul Gauguin). Chazal's abusive treatment made her a fugitive, then victim of Chazal's pistol, until she convinced the courts to grant her a divorce (outlawed since 1816—a major blow for feminism). This prompted Tristan to formulate a working idea of consentement for women, since a conventional woman's background prevents her from conceiving of consent as a man does, much less act upon it. A pariah marginalized by society, she was also freer to think, then act and effectuate her ideals. Despite hardship, she refused to see herself as a victim, but rather as better educated to help women and the poor. Tristan also never refuted her femininity by dressing as a man to gain respect, as did George Sand, for example, except when she once dressed as a man to gain entrance to a meeting of the British Parliament. While a feminist, she prioritized workers' rights ahead of Marx. She supported universal suffrage, but less pointedly than feminists like George Sand who were in favor of this larger mission. Tristan put first the poor and mistreated workers in the fight for unionization. She contended that effectuating solidarity with the worker's unions would render women's rights to vote more meaningful towards reforming a property-based society that de facto favored men. She traveled alone to London and Peru, producing extraordinary narratives on the plight of the poor and working class and on the women of post-revolutionary Peru who wore their veils as sources of mobility and power—rather than subjugation—within society. She could simply have limited this arduous Peruvian voyage to the recovery of part of her family fortune, but she never lost sight of her larger mission to learn from direct experience how to help the poor and enslaved. She even corresponded with Simon Bolivar on the new hope fostered by Latin American revolutions. Tristan consciously added solidarité to the French revolution's motto of Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité. Yet she never fully joined other thinkers and movements in such solidarity—Proudhon (pioneering trade-unionist but too misogynistic), Saint-Simonians or Fourierists—while borrowing some principles from each and prefiguring Marx's scientific socialism, uncredited. Doctrines did not suffice; they required actualization as solutions to society's ills. Part of Tristan's reformist activism included calling out (nommer)—j'accuse-style—persecutors of women and workers through cruelty, greed, and dishonesty. It was during her impassioned \"Tour of France\" traveling mission to educate the oppressed that she fell ill and died in Bordeaux, greatly mourned and revered by her followers and admirers. Although her books, articles...","PeriodicalId":391338,"journal":{"name":"Women in French Studies","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women in French Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wfs.2023.a909488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Flora Tristan by Brigitte Krulic Nadia Margolis Krulic, Brigitte. Flora Tristan. Gallimard, 2022. Pp. 380. ISBN 978-2-07-282022-9. 21.50€ (paper). First-time readers of Flora Tristan (1803-1844) often tend to ask the same question: why have we not heard more about her sooner? For indeed, she was one of those extraordinarily accomplished women authors who were so ahead of their time that, despite recognition by their contemporaries, they ended up forgotten shortly after their deaths. Fortunately, scholars and activists of congruent ideological agendas to theirs (as in 1968) finally discovered and evoked them as presaging voices from the past, yet still not engagingly enough for recognition by the general public, even though Tristan's life reads like a romantic novel, as surrealist André Breton and others would later observe. Brigitte Krulic offers the most complete, rigorous yet readable, up-to-date appraisal of Flora Tristan's place [End Page 155] in women's history and European social history in general. Interwoven within her biography, Krulic's main arguments and elucidations are discussed below. Tristan's pervasive self-image as "pariah" first relates to her early childhood as an orphaned bastard child: born to a Creole aristocratic Peruvian father and bourgeois Parisian mother married in a Catholic (but not civil) wedding, she led an impoverished childhood with her mother in Paris after her father died when she was four. Her situation forced her into an unhappy early marriage to her boss, Chazal, with whom she had three children (the third, Aline, would become mother to the celebrated, if hardly feminist, artist Paul Gauguin). Chazal's abusive treatment made her a fugitive, then victim of Chazal's pistol, until she convinced the courts to grant her a divorce (outlawed since 1816—a major blow for feminism). This prompted Tristan to formulate a working idea of consentement for women, since a conventional woman's background prevents her from conceiving of consent as a man does, much less act upon it. A pariah marginalized by society, she was also freer to think, then act and effectuate her ideals. Despite hardship, she refused to see herself as a victim, but rather as better educated to help women and the poor. Tristan also never refuted her femininity by dressing as a man to gain respect, as did George Sand, for example, except when she once dressed as a man to gain entrance to a meeting of the British Parliament. While a feminist, she prioritized workers' rights ahead of Marx. She supported universal suffrage, but less pointedly than feminists like George Sand who were in favor of this larger mission. Tristan put first the poor and mistreated workers in the fight for unionization. She contended that effectuating solidarity with the worker's unions would render women's rights to vote more meaningful towards reforming a property-based society that de facto favored men. She traveled alone to London and Peru, producing extraordinary narratives on the plight of the poor and working class and on the women of post-revolutionary Peru who wore their veils as sources of mobility and power—rather than subjugation—within society. She could simply have limited this arduous Peruvian voyage to the recovery of part of her family fortune, but she never lost sight of her larger mission to learn from direct experience how to help the poor and enslaved. She even corresponded with Simon Bolivar on the new hope fostered by Latin American revolutions. Tristan consciously added solidarité to the French revolution's motto of Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité. Yet she never fully joined other thinkers and movements in such solidarity—Proudhon (pioneering trade-unionist but too misogynistic), Saint-Simonians or Fourierists—while borrowing some principles from each and prefiguring Marx's scientific socialism, uncredited. Doctrines did not suffice; they required actualization as solutions to society's ills. Part of Tristan's reformist activism included calling out (nommer)—j'accuse-style—persecutors of women and workers through cruelty, greed, and dishonesty. It was during her impassioned "Tour of France" traveling mission to educate the oppressed that she fell ill and died in Bordeaux, greatly mourned and revered by her followers and admirers. Although her books, articles...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《弗洛拉·特里斯坦》布丽吉特·克鲁里克著(书评)
Nadia Margolis Krulic, Brigitte。植物特里斯坦。Gallimard, 2022年。380页。ISBN 978-2-07-282022-9。21.50€(纸)。第一次读弗洛拉·特里斯坦(1803-1844)的读者往往会问同样的问题:为什么我们没有早点听到更多关于她的消息?事实上,她是那些成就非凡的女作家之一,她们如此领先于她们的时代,尽管得到了同时代人的认可,但她们在去世后不久就被遗忘了。幸运的是,与他们的意识形态议程一致的学者和活动家(如1968年)最终发现并唤起了这些来自过去的预示声音,但仍然不够吸引公众的认可,尽管特里斯坦的生活读起来像一部浪漫小说,超现实主义者安德烈·布列东(andr Breton)和其他人后来观察到。布丽吉特·克鲁利克对弗洛拉·特里斯坦在女性历史和欧洲社会史上的地位提供了最完整、最严谨、最具可读性的最新评价。在她的传记中,克鲁利克的主要论点和解释将在下面讨论。特里斯坦普遍存在的“贱民”自我形象,首先与她早年作为一个孤儿的私生子有关:父亲是秘鲁克里奥尔贵族,母亲是巴黎资产阶级,他们的婚礼是天主教的(但不是民事的)婚礼。她四岁时父亲去世,她和母亲在巴黎度过了贫困的童年。她的处境迫使她与老板查扎尔(Chazal)不幸地早早结婚,两人育有三个孩子(第三个孩子艾琳(Aline)后来成为著名艺术家保罗·高更(Paul Gauguin)的母亲,尽管她算不上女权主义者)。Chazal的虐待使她成为一名逃犯,然后成为Chazal手枪的受害者,直到她说服法院批准她离婚(自1816年以来非法-这是对女权主义的重大打击)。这促使特里斯坦为女性制定了一个可行的同意概念,因为传统女性的背景使她无法像男性那样想象同意,更不用说采取行动了。作为一个被社会边缘化的贱民,她也可以更自由地思考、行动和实现自己的理想。尽管处境艰难,但她拒绝把自己视为受害者,而是希望接受更好的教育,帮助妇女和穷人。特里斯坦也从未像乔治·桑(George Sand)那样,为了赢得尊重而打扮成男性来反驳自己的女性气质,除了她曾经打扮成男性进入英国议会会议。作为一名女权主义者,她优先考虑工人的权利,而不是马克思。她支持普选,但没有乔治·桑(George Sand)等女权主义者那么明确,后者支持这一更大的使命。在争取工会化的斗争中,特里斯坦把穷人和受虐待的工人放在第一位。她争辩说,实现与工人工会的团结将使妇女的投票权对改革事实上有利于男子的以财产为基础的社会更有意义。她独自前往伦敦和秘鲁,对穷人和工人阶级的困境以及革命后的秘鲁妇女进行了非凡的叙述,这些妇女戴着面纱作为社会中流动性和权力的来源,而不是被征服。她本可以简单地把这次艰难的秘鲁之旅限制在恢复部分家族财产上,但她从未忘记自己更大的使命:从直接经验中学习如何帮助穷人和被奴役的人。她甚至与西蒙•玻利瓦尔(Simon Bolivar)通信,讨论拉丁美洲革命带来的新希望。特里斯坦有意识地在法国大革命的座右铭“自由主义”Égalité“博爱主义”中加入了“团结主义”。然而,她从来没有完全加入过其他思想家和运动的这种团结——蒲鲁东(工会主义者的先驱,但过于厌恶女性)、圣西门主义者或傅立叶主义者——她从每个人那里借鉴了一些原则,并预示了马克思的科学社会主义,没有得到认可。理论是不够的;它们需要实现,作为解决社会弊病的办法。特里斯坦的改革派激进主义的一部分,包括通过残忍、贪婪和不诚实,大声疾呼(匿名者)“指控式”迫害妇女和工人的人。在她充满激情的“环法”旅行任务中,她教育受压迫者,在波尔多生病并去世,她的追随者和崇拜者对她深表哀悼和尊敬。尽管她的书、文章……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cacaphonies–The Excremental Canon of French Literature by Annabel M. Kim (review) Meanings of Mass Rape During the 1994 Genocide Against the Tutsi in Rwanda: Understanding Intersectionality Through Survivor Testimonies Beauty and the Beast: The Original Story by Gabrielle-Suzanne Barbot de Villeneuve (review) Simone de Beauvoir's Struggle against Separation: Radical Challenges to Heterosexual Norms in Les inséparables and "La lesbienne" Objectifying and Objecting Objects: Looting to Rooting? How the American Black Lives Matter Movement Influences French Restitution in Benin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1