‘Nothing like it in any amusement hall!’: Opera, audacity and the audience in The Who’s Tommy

IF 0.2 0 THEATER Studies in Musical Theatre Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1386/smt_00119_1
Stephen Cedars
{"title":"‘Nothing like it in any amusement hall!’: Opera, audacity and the audience in The Who’s Tommy","authors":"Stephen Cedars","doi":"10.1386/smt_00119_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When Pete Townshend decided to call his band’s 1969 record Tommy a ‘rock opera’, he established a phrase equally easy to interrogate and to take for granted. And yet that provocation remains a remarkably fertile framing device that challenges conventional understandings of both ‘rock’ and ‘opera’. This article analyses Tommy as a conscious attempt to engage the conventions of the traditional opera medium and as a postmodern provocation that challenges the limitation for fixed media to inspire active engagement in its audience. As a work explicitly about the framing of entertainment, Tommy engages an ontological contradiction – between performed music and its conventions on the one hand, and the social signification of an ambitious story about liberation on the other – that is reflected in the work’s liminal connection to both the commercial and artistic worlds. The article considers the opera from several angles: as a libretto, meaning its structured story; as a score, meaning the recording which any subsequent performance is expected to reference if not reproduce; and as performance. I focus on Tommy ’s first stagings: The Who’s own during their album tour (which included a show at the Metropolitan Opera House), the 1971 Seattle Opera production and Ken Russell’s film. I suggest that the gambit of a ‘rock opera’ allows us to engage the essential question of whether an audience can ever be truly activated in a landscape where the slipperiness of meaning is too often codified into empty signifiers of the very activation it ostensibly wishes to produce.","PeriodicalId":41759,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Musical Theatre","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Musical Theatre","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/smt_00119_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When Pete Townshend decided to call his band’s 1969 record Tommy a ‘rock opera’, he established a phrase equally easy to interrogate and to take for granted. And yet that provocation remains a remarkably fertile framing device that challenges conventional understandings of both ‘rock’ and ‘opera’. This article analyses Tommy as a conscious attempt to engage the conventions of the traditional opera medium and as a postmodern provocation that challenges the limitation for fixed media to inspire active engagement in its audience. As a work explicitly about the framing of entertainment, Tommy engages an ontological contradiction – between performed music and its conventions on the one hand, and the social signification of an ambitious story about liberation on the other – that is reflected in the work’s liminal connection to both the commercial and artistic worlds. The article considers the opera from several angles: as a libretto, meaning its structured story; as a score, meaning the recording which any subsequent performance is expected to reference if not reproduce; and as performance. I focus on Tommy ’s first stagings: The Who’s own during their album tour (which included a show at the Metropolitan Opera House), the 1971 Seattle Opera production and Ken Russell’s film. I suggest that the gambit of a ‘rock opera’ allows us to engage the essential question of whether an audience can ever be truly activated in a landscape where the slipperiness of meaning is too often codified into empty signifiers of the very activation it ostensibly wishes to produce.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“在任何娱乐馆里都没有这样的!”:《谁人汤米》中的歌剧、大胆和观众
当Pete Townshend决定将他的乐队1969年的专辑《Tommy》称为“摇滚歌剧”时,他创造了一个同样容易被质疑和理所当然的短语。然而,这种挑衅仍然是一个非常丰富的框架装置,挑战了对“摇滚”和“歌剧”的传统理解。本文分析了《汤米》作为一种有意识的尝试,试图参与传统歌剧媒介的惯例,并作为一种后现代的挑衅,挑战了固定媒体激发观众积极参与的局限性。作为一部明确关于娱乐框架的作品,《汤米》卷入了一种本体论的矛盾——一方面是表演音乐及其惯例,另一方面是一个雄心勃勃的关于解放的故事的社会意义——这反映在作品与商业和艺术世界的有限联系中。本文从几个角度来考察这部歌剧:作为歌剧的歌词,意味着它的故事结构;作为配乐,是指任何后续演出即使不复制,也有望参考的录音;作为表演。我把重点放在汤米的首场演出上:谁人乐队在专辑巡演期间的演出(包括在大都会歌剧院的演出)、1971年西雅图歌剧院的演出和肯·拉塞尔的电影。我认为,“摇滚歌剧”的策略允许我们参与一个基本问题,即观众是否能够真正被激活在一个景观中,在这个景观中,滑溜的意义经常被编码成它表面上希望产生的激活的空洞的能指。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
‘A little bit naughty’: Storytelling and the logotherapeutic process in Matilda the Musical ‘Nothing like it in any amusement hall!’: Opera, audacity and the audience in The Who’s Tommy Unfinished Women Cry in No Man’s Land While a Bird Dies in a Gilded Cage, Aishah Rahman, directed by Chyna Michele ‘Honor the source’: Race, representation and intellectual property in Jelly’s Last Jam Pick a Pocket or Two, Ethan Mordden (2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1