Gita Seshadri, Sergio Pereyra, Karen Quek, Hao-Min Chen, Alex Hsieh
{"title":"Social Location, Power, and Disadvantage: Experiences of MFT Faculty","authors":"Gita Seshadri, Sergio Pereyra, Karen Quek, Hao-Min Chen, Alex Hsieh","doi":"10.1080/08952833.2023.2260058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe intersectionality of social identities is couched with status and power relations, creating both oppression and opportunity. Intersectionality explains the unique and challenging roles faculty of color play in showcasing their different identities within the dominant discourse. Using an approach of discourse analysis, we explored six stories of experiences being COAMFTE accredited graduates of Marriage and Family Therapy programs who became professionals. Further, we explored the intersection of their professional identities (e.g. clinicians, professors, supervisors, administrators), and how these intersected with their lived experiences of their social locations, while negotiating power, privilege, and disadvantage. These stories revealed three overarching discourses: subtle, contradictory, and discriminating messages, hidden and raw emotional experiences, and the strategies of the comeback. It is our hope that this discussion informs and provides examples for others as they practice within mental health and academia while navigating these roles within their own intersections. Systemic suggestions are also provided.KEYWORDS: academiadisadvantagefaculty of colorintersectionalitypower Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethical StatementWith the submission of this manuscript, we would like to mention that this manuscript has not been published elsewhere, accepted for publication elsewhere, or under editorial review for publication elsewhere; and that our Institution’s representatives (respectively) are fully aware of this submission. Also, we have no conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial). Since we used secondary data from a published book, there was no contact with human participants.","PeriodicalId":44214,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2023.2260058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTThe intersectionality of social identities is couched with status and power relations, creating both oppression and opportunity. Intersectionality explains the unique and challenging roles faculty of color play in showcasing their different identities within the dominant discourse. Using an approach of discourse analysis, we explored six stories of experiences being COAMFTE accredited graduates of Marriage and Family Therapy programs who became professionals. Further, we explored the intersection of their professional identities (e.g. clinicians, professors, supervisors, administrators), and how these intersected with their lived experiences of their social locations, while negotiating power, privilege, and disadvantage. These stories revealed three overarching discourses: subtle, contradictory, and discriminating messages, hidden and raw emotional experiences, and the strategies of the comeback. It is our hope that this discussion informs and provides examples for others as they practice within mental health and academia while navigating these roles within their own intersections. Systemic suggestions are also provided.KEYWORDS: academiadisadvantagefaculty of colorintersectionalitypower Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethical StatementWith the submission of this manuscript, we would like to mention that this manuscript has not been published elsewhere, accepted for publication elsewhere, or under editorial review for publication elsewhere; and that our Institution’s representatives (respectively) are fully aware of this submission. Also, we have no conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial). Since we used secondary data from a published book, there was no contact with human participants.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Feminist Family Therapy provides an international forum to further explore the relationship between feminist theory and family therapy theory and practice. The journal presents thought-provoking and insightful articles of a theoretical nature, as well as articles focusing on empirical research and clinical application. The Journal of Feminist Family Therapy critiques family therapy concepts from a feminist perspective with careful attention to cultural, class, and racial differences, applies a feminist-sensitive perspective to the treatment issues particular to women such as depression, agoraphobia, eating disorders, incest, and domestic abuse, etc.