Reward tampering and evolutionary computation: a study of concrete AI-safety problems using evolutionary algorithms

IF 1.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s10710-023-09456-0
Mathias K. Nilsen, Tønnes F. Nygaard, Kai Olav Ellefsen
{"title":"Reward tampering and evolutionary computation: a study of concrete AI-safety problems using evolutionary algorithms","authors":"Mathias K. Nilsen, Tønnes F. Nygaard, Kai Olav Ellefsen","doi":"10.1007/s10710-023-09456-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Reward tampering is a problem that will impact the trustworthiness of the powerful AI systems of the future. Reward Tampering describes the problem where AI agents bypass their intended objective, enabling unintended and potentially harmful behaviours. This paper investigates whether the creative potential of evolutionary algorithms could help ensure trustworthy solutions when facing this problem. The reason why evolutionary algorithms may help combat reward tampering is that they are able to find a diverse collection of different solutions to a problem within a single run, aiding the search for desirable solutions. Four different evolutionary algorithms were deployed in tasks illustrating the problem of reward tampering. The algorithms were designed with varying degrees of human expertise, measuring how human guidance influences the ability to discover trustworthy solutions. The results indicate that the algorithms’ ability to find and preserve trustworthy solutions is very dependent on preserving diversity during the search. Algorithms searching for behavioural diversity showed to be the most effective against reward tampering. Human expertise also showed to improve the certainty and quality of safe solutions, but even with only a minimal degree of human expertise, domain-independent diversity management was found to discover safe solutions.","PeriodicalId":50424,"journal":{"name":"Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-023-09456-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Reward tampering is a problem that will impact the trustworthiness of the powerful AI systems of the future. Reward Tampering describes the problem where AI agents bypass their intended objective, enabling unintended and potentially harmful behaviours. This paper investigates whether the creative potential of evolutionary algorithms could help ensure trustworthy solutions when facing this problem. The reason why evolutionary algorithms may help combat reward tampering is that they are able to find a diverse collection of different solutions to a problem within a single run, aiding the search for desirable solutions. Four different evolutionary algorithms were deployed in tasks illustrating the problem of reward tampering. The algorithms were designed with varying degrees of human expertise, measuring how human guidance influences the ability to discover trustworthy solutions. The results indicate that the algorithms’ ability to find and preserve trustworthy solutions is very dependent on preserving diversity during the search. Algorithms searching for behavioural diversity showed to be the most effective against reward tampering. Human expertise also showed to improve the certainty and quality of safe solutions, but even with only a minimal degree of human expertise, domain-independent diversity management was found to discover safe solutions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奖励篡改和进化计算:使用进化算法研究具体的人工智能安全问题
奖励篡改是一个影响未来强大人工智能系统可信度的问题。奖励篡改(Reward tamering)描述的是人工智能代理绕过其预期目标,导致意外和潜在有害行为的问题。本文研究了进化算法的创造潜力是否有助于在面对这一问题时确保可靠的解决方案。进化算法可能有助于对抗奖励篡改的原因是,它们能够在一次运行中找到一个问题的不同解决方案的不同集合,帮助寻找理想的解决方案。在演示奖励篡改问题的任务中部署了四种不同的进化算法。这些算法是根据不同程度的人类专业知识设计的,衡量人类指导如何影响发现可靠解决方案的能力。结果表明,算法寻找和保留可信解的能力在很大程度上依赖于在搜索过程中保持多样性。搜索行为多样性的算法被证明是对抗奖励篡改最有效的方法。人类专业知识也显示出提高安全解决方案的确定性和质量,但即使只有最低程度的人类专业知识,也发现领域独立的多样性管理可以发现安全解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
19
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: A unique source reporting on methods for artificial evolution of programs and machines... Reports innovative and significant progress in automatic evolution of software and hardware. Features both theoretical and application papers. Covers hardware implementations, artificial life, molecular computing and emergent computation techniques. Examines such related topics as evolutionary algorithms with variable-size genomes, alternate methods of program induction, approaches to engineering systems development based on embryology, morphogenesis or other techniques inspired by adaptive natural systems.
期刊最新文献
Evolving code with a large language model Hga-lstm: LSTM architecture and hyperparameter search by hybrid GA for air pollution prediction A survey on dynamic populations in bio-inspired algorithms GSGP-hardware: instantaneous symbolic regression with an FPGA implementation of geometric semantic genetic programming Geometric semantic GP with linear scaling: Darwinian versus Lamarckian evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1