The Relations of Constructs Measured by the Boyko Empathy Questionnaire and the EmIn Questionnaire

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Eksperimentalnaya Psikhologiya Pub Date : 2023-08-15 DOI:10.17759/exppsy.2023160212
A.V. Zhegallo, I.A. Basiul, A.V. Vlasov
{"title":"The Relations of Constructs Measured by the Boyko Empathy Questionnaire and the EmIn Questionnaire","authors":"A.V. Zhegallo, I.A. Basiul, A.V. Vlasov","doi":"10.17759/exppsy.2023160212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A comparison was made between each other at the level of subscales of the Boyko empathy questionnaire and the EmIn questionnaire. Additionally, the subscales of the questionnaires were compared with the results of the genetic analysis of COMT, DRD4, 5HTR2A. It is shown that the subscales of the questionnaires are mutually complementary. The revealed relationships of gene polymorphism with a number of subscales of both the Boyko empathy questionnaire and the EmIn questionnaire as a whole do not contradict existing data on the mechanisms in the regulation of which the studied genes are involved. At the same time, empathy, as measured by Boyko's questionnaire, is obviously not a monolithic construct. We believe that the final indicator of EEI, measured by the EmIn questionnaire, should also not be considered as a monolithic construct.</p>","PeriodicalId":43135,"journal":{"name":"Eksperimentalnaya Psikhologiya","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eksperimentalnaya Psikhologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2023160212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A comparison was made between each other at the level of subscales of the Boyko empathy questionnaire and the EmIn questionnaire. Additionally, the subscales of the questionnaires were compared with the results of the genetic analysis of COMT, DRD4, 5HTR2A. It is shown that the subscales of the questionnaires are mutually complementary. The revealed relationships of gene polymorphism with a number of subscales of both the Boyko empathy questionnaire and the EmIn questionnaire as a whole do not contradict existing data on the mechanisms in the regulation of which the studied genes are involved. At the same time, empathy, as measured by Boyko's questionnaire, is obviously not a monolithic construct. We believe that the final indicator of EEI, measured by the EmIn questionnaire, should also not be considered as a monolithic construct.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Boyko共情问卷与EmIn问卷所测构念之关系
<p style="text-align: justify;">在Boyko共情问卷和EmIn问卷的子量表水平上进行比较。并将问卷各分量表与COMT、DRD4、5HTR2A基因的遗传分析结果进行比较。结果表明,问卷各分量表具有互补性。基因多态性与Boyko共情问卷和EmIn问卷的多个子量表之间的关系与所研究基因参与的调节机制的现有数据并不矛盾。与此同时,博伊科的问卷所衡量的同理心显然不是一个单一的结构。我们认为,由EmIn问卷衡量的EEI最终指标也不应被视为一个单一的结构。</p>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eksperimentalnaya Psikhologiya
Eksperimentalnaya Psikhologiya PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
50.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Emotional Component of the Perceived Quality of Acoustic Events Categorization in Hybrid Search: A Study Using Eye Movement Registration Predictors of Nonverbal Recognition of Emotional Facial Expressions Face VS Figures: Features of Constructing the Age of an Unfamiliar Person Based on the Perception of His Portrait and Height Photographs Visual Illusions and Perception of Classical Architecture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1