Family and religion in flux: Relationship complexity, type of religiosity, and race/ethnicity

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Marriage and Family Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1111/jomf.12943
Jesse Smith
{"title":"Family and religion in flux: Relationship complexity, type of religiosity, and race/ethnicity","authors":"Jesse Smith","doi":"10.1111/jomf.12943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study examines the links between family formation, relationship history, and multiple types of religiosity in early–middle adulthood, as well as racial/ethnic heterogeneity of these associations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Family and religion have long been recognized as linked institutions. However, rapid changes in both institutions in recent decades necessitate a reexamination of this link. We know little about how this association varies by past versus present relationship experience, institutional versus private types of religiosity, or racial/ethnic group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Logistic regression models predicting religious attendance, importance of faith, and prayer frequency were estimated using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. Models included measures of both contemporaneous union and parenthood status and past relationship experiences. Additional analyses tested these associations separately for White, Black, and Hispanic respondents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Parenthood is consistently linked to higher, and cohabitation lower, religiosity. Respondents with more sexual partners tend to be less religious, while those with past marriages/divorces are more religious. Associations are stronger for attendance than faith or prayer, and more pronounced among White than Black or Hispanic respondents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The link between religion and family remains in evidence, but may have become more tenuous due to the delay and complexification of family formation. This link is strongest for White Americans and with respect to institutional rather than private religiosity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"86 1","pages":"268-287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.12943","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.12943","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study examines the links between family formation, relationship history, and multiple types of religiosity in early–middle adulthood, as well as racial/ethnic heterogeneity of these associations.

Background

Family and religion have long been recognized as linked institutions. However, rapid changes in both institutions in recent decades necessitate a reexamination of this link. We know little about how this association varies by past versus present relationship experience, institutional versus private types of religiosity, or racial/ethnic group.

Methods

Logistic regression models predicting religious attendance, importance of faith, and prayer frequency were estimated using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. Models included measures of both contemporaneous union and parenthood status and past relationship experiences. Additional analyses tested these associations separately for White, Black, and Hispanic respondents.

Results

Parenthood is consistently linked to higher, and cohabitation lower, religiosity. Respondents with more sexual partners tend to be less religious, while those with past marriages/divorces are more religious. Associations are stronger for attendance than faith or prayer, and more pronounced among White than Black or Hispanic respondents.

Conclusion

The link between religion and family remains in evidence, but may have become more tenuous due to the delay and complexification of family formation. This link is strongest for White Americans and with respect to institutional rather than private religiosity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变化中的家庭与宗教:关系复杂性、宗教信仰类型和种族/族裔
目的 本研究探讨了成年中早期家庭形成、关系史和多种宗教信仰之间的联系,以及这些联系的种族/民族异质性。 背景 长期以来,家庭和宗教一直被认为是相互关联的机构。然而,近几十年来,这两种制度都发生了急剧变化,因此有必要重新审视这种联系。我们对这种关联因过去与现在的关系经历、机构与私人宗教信仰类型或种族/民族群体的不同而产生的变化知之甚少。 方法 我们利用全国青少年到成人健康纵向研究(National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health)的数据对预测宗教出席率、信仰重要性和祈祷频率的逻辑回归模型进行了估计。模型中包括当时的结合和父母身份以及过去的关系经历。附加分析分别测试了白人、黑人和西班牙裔受访者的这些关联。 结果 父母身份一直与较高的宗教信仰有关,而同居则与较低的宗教信仰有关。有更多性伴侣的受访者往往宗教信仰程度较低,而有过婚姻/离婚经历的受访者宗教信仰程度较高。与信仰或祈祷相比,参加宗教活动与宗教信仰的关系更为密切,在白人受访者中比在黑人或西班牙裔受访者中更为明显。 结论 宗教与家庭之间的联系依然存在,但由于家庭组建的延迟和复杂化,这种联系可能变得更加脆弱。这种联系在美国白人中最为明显,在机构而非个人宗教信仰方面也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Introduction to mid-decade Special Issue on Theory and Methods The ties that bind: Questions for studying families in neighborhood contexts Issue Information Looking beyond marital status: What we can learn from relationship status measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1