A Harmonized Synthesis of Spirituality and Reason and the Birth of Modern Individualism Manifested in Montaigne’s Essays

Hoonsung Hwang
{"title":"A Harmonized Synthesis of Spirituality and Reason and the Birth of Modern Individualism Manifested in Montaigne’s Essays","authors":"Hoonsung Hwang","doi":"10.29324/jewcl.2023.9.65.289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article attempts to shed light on Montaigne as a voyant who can see through the problematics in transition period between the Renaissance and the Modern or between Realism and Nominalism. Apparently he sticks to the Orthodoxy of Roman Catholics, however, a closer reading of his Essays will reveal the hidden agenda of the Enlightenment project based on reason in lieu of spirituality. The modernity of Montaigne thus rests on 1)Pyrrhonism based on critical reason; 2)an existentialist understanding of man as particular being based on Nominalism; 3)an attempt to draw human psychology topographically, and finally 4)an existentialist or rational approach to the phenomenon of death.BR For Enlightenment thinkers, reason is a blessing as well as a curse. Early Enlightenment thinkers imbued in Roman Catholicism tend to view reason, when coupled with hubris, as a curse doomed to damn humanity. The gist of Montaigne‘s project of harmonizing reason and spirituality lies in his wise division of realms of human concerns and activity. In other words, spirituality or soul concerns religious affairs, while reason is in charge of social ethos concerning human affairs.BR In a broader perspective, Montaigne is one of those intellectual giants who have endeavored to change the philosophical current flowing from Realism characterized by communal concept of human abstractness manifested in the Great Chain of Being to Nominalism characterized by Existentialism with emphasis on human Eigentlichkeit. In a nutshell, Montaigne‘s project of modernity is to synthesize Christian spirituality and Socratic or Stoic reason: the former for Divine Sanctification for the life to come and the latter for ataraxia during the Earthly sojourn by virtue of reason and temperance.","PeriodicalId":479618,"journal":{"name":"Dongseo bi'gyo munhag jeo'neol","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dongseo bi'gyo munhag jeo'neol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29324/jewcl.2023.9.65.289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article attempts to shed light on Montaigne as a voyant who can see through the problematics in transition period between the Renaissance and the Modern or between Realism and Nominalism. Apparently he sticks to the Orthodoxy of Roman Catholics, however, a closer reading of his Essays will reveal the hidden agenda of the Enlightenment project based on reason in lieu of spirituality. The modernity of Montaigne thus rests on 1)Pyrrhonism based on critical reason; 2)an existentialist understanding of man as particular being based on Nominalism; 3)an attempt to draw human psychology topographically, and finally 4)an existentialist or rational approach to the phenomenon of death.BR For Enlightenment thinkers, reason is a blessing as well as a curse. Early Enlightenment thinkers imbued in Roman Catholicism tend to view reason, when coupled with hubris, as a curse doomed to damn humanity. The gist of Montaigne‘s project of harmonizing reason and spirituality lies in his wise division of realms of human concerns and activity. In other words, spirituality or soul concerns religious affairs, while reason is in charge of social ethos concerning human affairs.BR In a broader perspective, Montaigne is one of those intellectual giants who have endeavored to change the philosophical current flowing from Realism characterized by communal concept of human abstractness manifested in the Great Chain of Being to Nominalism characterized by Existentialism with emphasis on human Eigentlichkeit. In a nutshell, Montaigne‘s project of modernity is to synthesize Christian spirituality and Socratic or Stoic reason: the former for Divine Sanctification for the life to come and the latter for ataraxia during the Earthly sojourn by virtue of reason and temperance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神与理性的和谐结合与现代个人主义的诞生——从蒙田的《随笔》看
本文试图揭示蒙田作为一个透视文艺复兴与现代或现实主义与唯名主义之间的过渡时期的问题的旅行者。显然,他坚持罗马天主教的正统,然而,仔细阅读他的《随笔》,会发现启蒙运动的隐藏议程是基于理性而不是灵性。因此,蒙田的现代性有赖于1)以批判理性为基础的皮龙主义;2)基于唯名论的存在主义对人作为特殊存在的理解;3)尝试从地形学的角度描绘人类的心理,最后4)对死亡现象采取存在主义或理性的方法。BR对启蒙思想家来说,理性既是福也是祸。受罗马天主教影响的早期启蒙思想家倾向于将理性与傲慢相结合,视为注定要诅咒人类的诅咒。蒙田协调理性和精神的计划的要点在于他对人类关注和活动领域的明智划分。换句话说,灵性或灵魂涉及宗教事务,而理性负责涉及人类事务的社会风气。BR从更广泛的角度看,蒙田是力图改变以《存在的大链》为代表的以人类抽象性的共同概念为特征的现实主义到以存在主义为特征并强调人类特征的唯名主义的哲学思潮的知识巨人之一。简而言之,蒙田的现代性计划是将基督教的灵性与苏格拉底的或斯多亚派的理性结合起来:前者是为了来世的神圣圣化,后者是为了通过理性和节制在尘世逗留期间的精神失调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Korean War and Psychoanalysis: Temporary Reconciliation or Therapy? Patriarchy, Gender Inequality, and Religion in Navoi’s Layli and Majnun and Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet The Narrative Style of Hadji Murat: Contrast through Contrapuntal Juxtaposition Alien’s Looking into the American Family: Kim Yong Ik’s Focused on “They Won’t Crack It Open” and “Sheep, Jimmy and I” The Rise of the Novel and Dis-/Example in Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1