Visualising spatial equity of park-access for the elderly from a multidimensional perspective in Yangzhou, China

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Local Environment Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1080/13549839.2023.2279546
Zhiming Li, Liang Xia
{"title":"Visualising spatial equity of park-access for the elderly from a multidimensional perspective in Yangzhou, China","authors":"Zhiming Li, Liang Xia","doi":"10.1080/13549839.2023.2279546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTUrban parks provide critical ecosystem services and satisfy residents’ recreational needs. As the population ages, whether the elderly can enjoy park resources equally has become an important issue in spatial justice research. However, most research on park equity is based on accessibility evaluation at spatial scales. Insufficient attention has been paid to selectivity and convenience in accessing parks for the elderly, as well as the importance of their perceptions and preferences in park-selection decision-making. Thus, this study constructed a multidimensional model to assess park equity for the elderly that included accessibility (Ai), proximity (Pi), quality (Qi), and diversity (Di). Our analysis of Yangzhou, China, revealed the following: (1) In Yangzhou central districts, only 21.46% of the elderly in the community could have a high level of park access, while entering parks was difficult or almost impossible for them in 28.34% of the communities. (2) The demographic distribution of the elderly was complete mismatched with all four assessment dimensions, among which accessibility was the most unequal. (3) The number and types of facilities inside parks were the most important considerations for the elderly when choosing parks, and the comfort level of parks had the most influence on their decision-making. The research results aim to make targeted recommendations to ameliorate inequalities in park access for the elderly and contribute to the construction of “age-friendly” cities.KEYWORDS: Elderlyspatial equityurban parkmultidimensional evaluationaccessibilitypreference AcknowledgementsThe authors greatly appreciate everyone for their enthusiastic help during the writing process. We thank the corresponding author for his generous support of this study. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":54257,"journal":{"name":"Local Environment","volume":"75 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2023.2279546","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTUrban parks provide critical ecosystem services and satisfy residents’ recreational needs. As the population ages, whether the elderly can enjoy park resources equally has become an important issue in spatial justice research. However, most research on park equity is based on accessibility evaluation at spatial scales. Insufficient attention has been paid to selectivity and convenience in accessing parks for the elderly, as well as the importance of their perceptions and preferences in park-selection decision-making. Thus, this study constructed a multidimensional model to assess park equity for the elderly that included accessibility (Ai), proximity (Pi), quality (Qi), and diversity (Di). Our analysis of Yangzhou, China, revealed the following: (1) In Yangzhou central districts, only 21.46% of the elderly in the community could have a high level of park access, while entering parks was difficult or almost impossible for them in 28.34% of the communities. (2) The demographic distribution of the elderly was complete mismatched with all four assessment dimensions, among which accessibility was the most unequal. (3) The number and types of facilities inside parks were the most important considerations for the elderly when choosing parks, and the comfort level of parks had the most influence on their decision-making. The research results aim to make targeted recommendations to ameliorate inequalities in park access for the elderly and contribute to the construction of “age-friendly” cities.KEYWORDS: Elderlyspatial equityurban parkmultidimensional evaluationaccessibilitypreference AcknowledgementsThe authors greatly appreciate everyone for their enthusiastic help during the writing process. We thank the corresponding author for his generous support of this study. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多维视角下扬州市老年人公园通道空间公平性的可视化
头巾公园提供了重要的生态系统服务,满足了居民的娱乐需求。随着人口的老龄化,老年人能否平等地享受公园资源已成为空间公正研究的一个重要问题。然而,大多数关于公园公平的研究都是基于空间尺度上的可达性评价。老年人进入公园的选择性和便利性以及老年人的感知和偏好在公园选择决策中的重要性没有得到足够的重视。因此,本研究构建了一个包括可达性(Ai)、接近性(Pi)、质量(Qi)和多样性(Di)的多维模型来评估老年人公园公平性。结果表明:(1)在扬州市中心城区,只有21.46%的社区老年人有较高水平的公园可达性,而28.34%的社区老年人很难或几乎不可能进入公园。(2)老年人人口分布与四个评价维度完全不匹配,其中可及性最不匹配。(3)公园内设施的数量和类型是老年人选择公园时最主要的考虑因素,而公园的舒适度对老年人的决策影响最大。研究结果旨在为改善老年人公园通行不平等现象提供有针对性的建议,为“老人友好型”城市的建设做出贡献。关键词:老年人空间公平城市公园多维度评价可达性偏好感谢在撰写过程中给予的热心帮助。我们感谢通讯作者对本研究的慷慨支持。我们也要感谢审稿人提供的有用的意见和建议。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Local Environment
Local Environment Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability is a refereed journal written by and for researchers, activists, non-governmental organisations, students, teachers, policy makers and practitioners. Our focus is specifically on sustainability planning, policy and politics in relation to theoretical, conceptual and empirical studies at the nexus of equity, justice and the local environment. It is an inclusive forum for diverse constituencies and perspectives to engage in a critical examination, evaluation and discussion of the environmental, social and economic policies, processes and strategies which will be needed in movement towards social justice and sustainability - "Just Sustainabilities" - at local, regional, national and global scales. Please note that we only accept submissions that share our focus. Based on critical research and practical experience, we are particularly seeking submissions from nations and continents representing different levels of income and industrial development and from countries in transition in order to engage in mutual learning and understanding.
期刊最新文献
Living lab as support for co-creation of value: application to agro-biodiversity contracting solutions Challenges and opportunities of urban agriculture programme implementation in Indonesia: social, economic, and environmental perspectives Revisiting the garden city concept and urban green infrastructure discourse in sustainable city planning in sub-Saharan Africa If it’s in our backyard: the roles of local knowledge in the formation of a nuclear oversight organisation Perception of and adaptation practices to climate change: a case study of smallholder paddy farmers in Dai Loc district of Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1