Occupational Hearing Loss Associated with the Combined Exposure of Solvents and Noise: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Safety Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.3390/safety9040071
Jia Ren, Hongwei Xie, Yong Hu, Yu Hong, Hua Zou, Xiangjing Gao
{"title":"Occupational Hearing Loss Associated with the Combined Exposure of Solvents and Noise: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Jia Ren, Hongwei Xie, Yong Hu, Yu Hong, Hua Zou, Xiangjing Gao","doi":"10.3390/safety9040071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To analyze the predominant frequencies of hearing threshold shift and the prevalence of hearing loss related to the co-exposure to noise and solvents. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by retrieving published articles from Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and ProQuest until July 2023. Data were extracted in line with the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality were used to assess the studies’ quality. The meta-analysis was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). I2 and Q statistics were used to prove the heterogeneity. A total of 22 selected studies (9948 workers), six cohort studies and 16 cross-sectional studies were included. The results revealed that 43.7%, 41.3%, and 53.6% of the participants presented with hearing loss due to noise exposure, solvent exposure, and combined exposure to noise and solvent, respectively. The workers exposed to both noise and solvents had a higher risk of hearing loss than those exposed to noise (overall weighted odds ratio [OR]: 1.76) or solvents (overall-weighted OR: 2.02) alone. The poorer hearing threshold in the combined noise and solvents exposure group was mainly at high frequencies (3, 4, 6, and 8 kHz), with a peak of 29.47 dB HL at 6 kHz. The noise-exposed group’s peak hearing threshold was 28.87 dB HL at 4 kHz. The peak hearing threshold of the solvent-exposed group was 28.65 dB HL at 6 kHz. The workers exposed to noise and solvent simultaneously had a higher prevalence of hearing loss than those exposed to solvents. Co-exposure to noise and solvents increases the odds of hearing loss. The dominant hearing threshold changes occurred at 3, 4, 6, and 8 kHz, and the peak value appeared at 6 kHz in workers co-exposed to noise and solvents.","PeriodicalId":36827,"journal":{"name":"Safety","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9040071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To analyze the predominant frequencies of hearing threshold shift and the prevalence of hearing loss related to the co-exposure to noise and solvents. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by retrieving published articles from Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and ProQuest until July 2023. Data were extracted in line with the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality were used to assess the studies’ quality. The meta-analysis was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). I2 and Q statistics were used to prove the heterogeneity. A total of 22 selected studies (9948 workers), six cohort studies and 16 cross-sectional studies were included. The results revealed that 43.7%, 41.3%, and 53.6% of the participants presented with hearing loss due to noise exposure, solvent exposure, and combined exposure to noise and solvent, respectively. The workers exposed to both noise and solvents had a higher risk of hearing loss than those exposed to noise (overall weighted odds ratio [OR]: 1.76) or solvents (overall-weighted OR: 2.02) alone. The poorer hearing threshold in the combined noise and solvents exposure group was mainly at high frequencies (3, 4, 6, and 8 kHz), with a peak of 29.47 dB HL at 6 kHz. The noise-exposed group’s peak hearing threshold was 28.87 dB HL at 4 kHz. The peak hearing threshold of the solvent-exposed group was 28.65 dB HL at 6 kHz. The workers exposed to noise and solvent simultaneously had a higher prevalence of hearing loss than those exposed to solvents. Co-exposure to noise and solvents increases the odds of hearing loss. The dominant hearing threshold changes occurred at 3, 4, 6, and 8 kHz, and the peak value appeared at 6 kHz in workers co-exposed to noise and solvents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业性听力损失与溶剂和噪音的综合暴露:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
分析与噪声和溶剂共同暴露有关的听力阈值移位的主要频率和听力损失的患病率。通过检索Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus、Embase和ProQuest截至2023年7月的已发表文章,进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。根据Cochrane协作手册提取数据,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和医疗保健研究与质量机构来评估研究的质量。meta分析采用95%置信区间(CI)估计优势比(ORs)。采用I2和Q统计量证明异质性。共纳入22项精选研究(9948名工人),6项队列研究和16项横断面研究。结果显示,43.7%、41.3%和53.6%的参与者分别因噪音暴露、溶剂暴露和噪音和溶剂联合暴露而出现听力损失。同时暴露于噪音和溶剂的工人比单独暴露于噪音(总加权比值比[OR]: 1.76)或溶剂(总加权比值比:2.02)的工人有更高的听力损失风险。噪声和溶剂联合暴露组较差的听力阈值主要出现在高频(3、4、6和8 kHz), 6 kHz峰值为29.47 dB HL。噪声暴露组在4 kHz时的峰值听阈为28.87 dB HL。溶剂暴露组在6 kHz时的峰值听力阈值为28.65 dB HL。同时暴露于噪音和溶剂的工人比暴露于溶剂的工人听力损失的患病率更高。同时暴露在噪音和溶剂中会增加听力损失的几率。噪声和溶剂共暴露工人的主要听阈变化发生在3、4、6和8 kHz,峰值出现在6 kHz。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Safety
Safety Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enhancing System Safety and Reliability through Integrated FMEA and Game Theory: A Multi-Factor Approach General Knowledge and Attitudes about Safety and Emergency Evacuation: The Case of a Higher Education Institution Simultaneous Enhancement of Welder Health and Aluminum Weld Joint Quality Using Controlled Welding Room Condition Control Transitions in Level 3 Automation: Safety Implications in Mixed-Autonomy Traffic Improving Functional Exercises Based on Experts’ Evaluation Weights for Emergency Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1