Moving beyond reasonable adjustments: supporting employability through inclusive assessment design

Joanna Tai
{"title":"Moving beyond reasonable adjustments: supporting employability through inclusive assessment design","authors":"Joanna Tai","doi":"10.21153/jtlge2023vol14no2art1785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher education is moving towards being more inclusive. However, students with disabilities continue to report that their assessment experiences are less than optimal. In these situations, if an assessment format does not enable demonstration of achievement due to aspects irrelevant to the capabilities of interest, then such students are unfairly penalised. In this way, assessment impacts on students’ success at university and beyond. Assessment adjustments are required by law, but are only partially effective since they may impact on assessment validity and hence opportunities for students to accurately represent their learning and achievement. To ensure assessment supports, rather than detracts, from student success and employability, assessment design should be scrutinised in terms of inclusion, with consideration of future potential work environments and graduate attributes. This paper presents an analysis of 2860 assessment adjustments implemented for students with a range of conditions and students’ experiences of adjustments, to highlight possibilities for inclusive assessment design which promote graduate employability. Adjustments relating to exams were most common (71% of students), but group work and oral presentations were also problematic for inclusion. Redesigning exams, including formative opportunities and structures for oral and group tasks, offering flexibility in tasks, and involving students in understanding equivalence across assessment types could improve inclusion. Through supporting students in these ways, assessment design could also incorporate the development of graduate attributes, such as teamwork, global citizenship and communication. This is likely to have a positive impact on students’ success and employability.","PeriodicalId":37004,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2023vol14no2art1785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Higher education is moving towards being more inclusive. However, students with disabilities continue to report that their assessment experiences are less than optimal. In these situations, if an assessment format does not enable demonstration of achievement due to aspects irrelevant to the capabilities of interest, then such students are unfairly penalised. In this way, assessment impacts on students’ success at university and beyond. Assessment adjustments are required by law, but are only partially effective since they may impact on assessment validity and hence opportunities for students to accurately represent their learning and achievement. To ensure assessment supports, rather than detracts, from student success and employability, assessment design should be scrutinised in terms of inclusion, with consideration of future potential work environments and graduate attributes. This paper presents an analysis of 2860 assessment adjustments implemented for students with a range of conditions and students’ experiences of adjustments, to highlight possibilities for inclusive assessment design which promote graduate employability. Adjustments relating to exams were most common (71% of students), but group work and oral presentations were also problematic for inclusion. Redesigning exams, including formative opportunities and structures for oral and group tasks, offering flexibility in tasks, and involving students in understanding equivalence across assessment types could improve inclusion. Through supporting students in these ways, assessment design could also incorporate the development of graduate attributes, such as teamwork, global citizenship and communication. This is likely to have a positive impact on students’ success and employability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越合理调整:通过包容性评估设计支持就业能力
高等教育正朝着更具包容性的方向发展。然而,残疾学生继续报告说,他们的评估经验不太理想。在这种情况下,如果一种评估形式由于与感兴趣的能力无关的方面而不能证明成绩,那么这些学生就会受到不公平的惩罚。通过这种方式,评估影响着学生在大学及以后的成功。评估调整是法律要求的,但只是部分有效,因为这可能会影响评估的有效性,从而影响学生准确反映他们的学习和成就的机会。为了确保评估支持而不是减损学生的成功和就业能力,评估设计应在包容性方面进行仔细审查,并考虑到未来潜在的工作环境和毕业生属性。本文分析了2860项针对不同条件的学生实施的评估调整以及学生的调整经验,以突出包容性评估设计的可能性,从而提高毕业生的就业能力。与考试相关的调整是最常见的(71%的学生),但小组工作和口头报告也存在问题。重新设计考试,包括口头和小组任务的形成机会和结构,在任务中提供灵活性,并让学生了解不同评估类型的等效性,可以提高包容性。通过以这些方式支持学生,评估设计也可以纳入研究生属性的发展,如团队合作,全球公民和沟通。这可能会对学生的成功和就业能力产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
External aspects that stand out in the self-perceived employability of engineering students and recent graduates The nexus of work integrated learning and skills among engineering students in Nigerian Universities: A structural equation model approach External aspects that stand out in the self-perceived employability of engineering students and recent graduates The nexus of work integrated learning and skills among engineering students in Nigerian Universities: A structural equation model approach Exploring the role of generic competencies in employability and academic performance of students of psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1