Assessment of antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures in a tertiary care hospital in Southern India: A cross-sectional study

IF 0.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_98_23
Swathi Acharya, Ananyaa Agrawal
{"title":"Assessment of antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures in a tertiary care hospital in Southern India: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Swathi Acharya, Ananyaa Agrawal","doi":"10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_98_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the second-most common cause of health care-associated infections and are responsible for postoperative illness leading to increased morbidity and mortality. There are various preventive strategies against SSIs such as proper surgical technique, strict asepsis in the operating theater, control of infection within the hospital or general practice, and antibiotic prophylaxis. Widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics has the disadvantage of the emergence of multiresistant organisms. Thus, the implementation of proper surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) practice is highly recommended to assess the pattern of SAP practiced in a tertiary care hospital in southern India. Subjects and Methods: A prospective, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital where data were collected from 175 inpatients admitted to the surgical ward. The pattern of SAP practice was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The pattern of antibiotic prophylaxis revealed that the most commonly used agents were third-generation cephalosporins (57.71%), followed by broad-spectrum penicillins (18.86%), second-generation cephalosporins (13.71%), fluoroquinolones (4.57%), and antiamebic drugs (13.14%) mainly for gastrointestinal surgeries. Conclusions: Assessing the pattern of antimicrobial prophylaxis will help us to determine the appropriateness of the drugs prescribed with respect to the procedure and will help us to give feedback to the clinician and policymakers regarding the need for improvement in case of deviation in the practice compared to the guidelines given in the hospital antibiotic policy.","PeriodicalId":8534,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_98_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the second-most common cause of health care-associated infections and are responsible for postoperative illness leading to increased morbidity and mortality. There are various preventive strategies against SSIs such as proper surgical technique, strict asepsis in the operating theater, control of infection within the hospital or general practice, and antibiotic prophylaxis. Widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics has the disadvantage of the emergence of multiresistant organisms. Thus, the implementation of proper surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) practice is highly recommended to assess the pattern of SAP practiced in a tertiary care hospital in southern India. Subjects and Methods: A prospective, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital where data were collected from 175 inpatients admitted to the surgical ward. The pattern of SAP practice was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The pattern of antibiotic prophylaxis revealed that the most commonly used agents were third-generation cephalosporins (57.71%), followed by broad-spectrum penicillins (18.86%), second-generation cephalosporins (13.71%), fluoroquinolones (4.57%), and antiamebic drugs (13.14%) mainly for gastrointestinal surgeries. Conclusions: Assessing the pattern of antimicrobial prophylaxis will help us to determine the appropriateness of the drugs prescribed with respect to the procedure and will help us to give feedback to the clinician and policymakers regarding the need for improvement in case of deviation in the practice compared to the guidelines given in the hospital antibiotic policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估抗菌预防在外科手术在印度南部三级护理医院:一项横断面研究
背景:手术部位感染(ssi)是医疗保健相关感染的第二大常见原因,是导致发病率和死亡率增加的术后疾病的原因。有各种预防ssi的策略,如适当的手术技术、手术室严格的无菌、医院或普通诊所内的感染控制以及抗生素预防。预防性抗生素的广泛使用带来了多重耐药菌的出现。因此,强烈建议实施适当的外科抗菌预防(SAP)实践,以评估印度南部三级保健医院实施的SAP模式。研究对象和方法:在一家三级医院进行了一项前瞻性、观察性、横断面研究,收集了175名外科病房住院患者的数据。使用描述性统计分析SAP实践的模式。结果:抗菌药物预防模式显示,最常用的药物为第三代头孢菌素(57.71%),其次为广谱青霉素(18.86%)、第二代头孢菌素(13.71%)、氟喹诺酮类(4.57%)和以胃肠手术为主的抗阿米巴药物(13.14%)。结论:评估抗菌药物预防模式将帮助我们确定处方药物的适当性,并将帮助我们向临床医生和政策制定者反馈在实践中与医院抗生素政策中给出的指南相偏差时需要改进的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Establishing Escherichia coli on Balb/C Rats as A Model of Preterm Labor Headache Characteristic in Covid-19 Infected Patient: A Systematic Review Exploring The Relationship Between Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels, Leukocyte Counts, Low Birth Weight, and The Severity of Preeclampsia in Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study at Saiful Anwar Hospital Malang (July 2021 to June 2022) A Challenging Case: Colorectal Cancer During Pregnancy The Relationship and Factors The Parenting Style of Parents Who Married Early with The Development of Children Aged 1-5 Years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1