Quantification of leafy vegetables loss at primary production - research limitations and proposed methodology for on-farm data collection

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q4 HORTICULTURE Horticultura Brasileira Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/s0102-0536-2023-e2604
Milza M Lana
{"title":"Quantification of leafy vegetables loss at primary production - research limitations and proposed methodology for on-farm data collection","authors":"Milza M Lana","doi":"10.1590/s0102-0536-2023-e2604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research discussed in this paper reports the difficulties related to on-farm data collection of leafy vegetables loss and proposes a method to estimate vegetable loss in an exploratory survey. Loss was estimated for rocket (Eruca sativa), coriander (Coriandrum sativum) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa) in two farms located in Federal District, Brazil. The best index to express loss due to unharvested plants was different whether the vegetable was marketed as plant units (lettuce) or bunches (rocket and coriander). The discard of rocket varied substantially between farms and between successive crops in the same farm. On Farm 1, it varied from 80.6% to 0.0% of the crop area and on Farm 2 from 42.4% to 72.4%. Loss of coriander on Farm 1 varied from 0.0% to 10.8% of the area, compared to 2.3% to 34.5% on Farm 2. The total loss for each lettuce type varied between and within farms. Considering individual surveys on both farms, the losses of lettuce varied from 1.6% to 84.8% of the plant population at harvest, depending on the lettuce type, crop and farm. Measuring losses of leafy vegetables at primary production proved to be quite challenging and time consuming. Two boundaries were particularly difficult to establish: marketable versus unmarketable produce and pre-harvest loss versus harvest loss. In view of the difficulties faced during the measurement of leafy vegetables loss at primary production, the methodology was changed in order to decrease the number of visits and the time of permanence in the farm necessary to accomplish a survey; be independent of data collection by the farmer and by the farm’ staff; reduce the costs of displacement to the farm.","PeriodicalId":56307,"journal":{"name":"Horticultura Brasileira","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horticultura Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-0536-2023-e2604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HORTICULTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research discussed in this paper reports the difficulties related to on-farm data collection of leafy vegetables loss and proposes a method to estimate vegetable loss in an exploratory survey. Loss was estimated for rocket (Eruca sativa), coriander (Coriandrum sativum) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa) in two farms located in Federal District, Brazil. The best index to express loss due to unharvested plants was different whether the vegetable was marketed as plant units (lettuce) or bunches (rocket and coriander). The discard of rocket varied substantially between farms and between successive crops in the same farm. On Farm 1, it varied from 80.6% to 0.0% of the crop area and on Farm 2 from 42.4% to 72.4%. Loss of coriander on Farm 1 varied from 0.0% to 10.8% of the area, compared to 2.3% to 34.5% on Farm 2. The total loss for each lettuce type varied between and within farms. Considering individual surveys on both farms, the losses of lettuce varied from 1.6% to 84.8% of the plant population at harvest, depending on the lettuce type, crop and farm. Measuring losses of leafy vegetables at primary production proved to be quite challenging and time consuming. Two boundaries were particularly difficult to establish: marketable versus unmarketable produce and pre-harvest loss versus harvest loss. In view of the difficulties faced during the measurement of leafy vegetables loss at primary production, the methodology was changed in order to decrease the number of visits and the time of permanence in the farm necessary to accomplish a survey; be independent of data collection by the farmer and by the farm’ staff; reduce the costs of displacement to the farm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
叶菜初级生产损失的量化——研究局限和农场数据收集的建议方法
摘要:本文讨论的研究报告了与叶菜损失的农场数据收集相关的困难,并提出了一种估算蔬菜损失的探索性调查方法。在巴西联邦区的两个农场估计了火箭(Eruca sativa)、香菜(Coriandrum sativum)和生菜(Lactuca sativa)的损失。反映未收获植株损失的最佳指标是不同的,无论蔬菜是作为植物单位(生菜)还是作为植物束(火箭和香菜)销售。在不同的农场和同一农场的连续作物之间,火箭的丢弃量有很大的不同。在农场1,它在作物面积的80.6% - 0.0%之间变化,在农场2在42.4% - 72.4%之间变化。农场1的香菜损失面积从0.0%到10.8%不等,而农场2的损失面积为2.3%到34.5%。每种生菜的总损失在农场之间和农场内部都有所不同。考虑到两个农场的个别调查,生菜的损失在收获时占植物种群的1.6%至84.8%不等,具体取决于生菜类型、作物和农场。测量叶菜在初级生产阶段的损失被证明是相当具有挑战性和耗时的。有两个界限特别难以划定:适销农产品与滞销农产品以及收获前损失与收获损失。鉴于在测量初级生产中叶菜损失时所面临的困难,改变了方法,以减少完成调查所需的访问次数和在农场停留的时间;独立于农民和农场工作人员收集的数据;减少迁移给农场带来的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Horticultura Brasileira
Horticultura Brasileira 农林科学-园艺
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
28.60%
发文量
45
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Horticultura Brasileira, a quarterly journal, is the Official Publication of the Sociedade de Olericultura do Brasil. Its abbreviated title is Hortic. bras., and it should be used in bibliographies, footnotes, references and bibliographic strips.
期刊最新文献
Agronomic efficiency of fermented composts in organic fertilization management of butterhead lettuce and green leaf lettuce Flavor and color: ‘IAC 134 AL01’, the Campinas Agronomic Institute’s first orange-colored pulp sweet potato cultivar Morphological characters contributing to yield increase of potato cultivars in Brazil No-till cabbage production in different cover crops and phosphorus sources in the Brazilian Cerrado Evaluation of summer carrot cultivars in bed and ridge systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1