Effects of Cognitive Demand Levels for Various Horticultural Activities on Psychophysiological Responses in Adults

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 HORTICULTURE Hortscience Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.21273/hortsci17272-23
Yun-Jin Kim, Sin-Ae Park
{"title":"Effects of Cognitive Demand Levels for Various Horticultural Activities on Psychophysiological Responses in Adults","authors":"Yun-Jin Kim, Sin-Ae Park","doi":"10.21273/hortsci17272-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared the effects of horticultural activities according to cognitive demand levels on psychophysiological responses in adults. Thirty-two adults in their 20s were included. Participants performed 10 horticultural activities (raking, planting transplants, fertilizing, tying plants to stakes, harvesting, sowing, conducting cuttage, planting potted plants, cutting and washing, arranging flowers) for 150 seconds at two levels of cognitive demand. Electroencephalographic (EEG) and electrocardiographic measurements were acquired during the activity. After each activity, the participants’ emotional states were evaluated using the semantic differential method (SDM). The EEG results, according to comparison by activity, showed that for nine activities, excluding raking, relative theta decreased when performing tasks at a level of high cognitive difficulty (HCD) compared with those with a low cognitive difficulty (LCD), and relative beta, relative gamma, fast alpha, and relative low beta increased, indicating activation of the prefrontal cortex. In the relative theta power spectra, the cuttage activity was found to be the lowest when performing tasks at a high level high cognitive difficulty, and the working memory function was activated the most compared with other activities. When sowing at a low level of cognitive demand, participants’ heart rate decreased and stabilized. When potted plants were harvested at a high level of cognitive difficulty, the ratio of low frequency to high frequency increased, and the sympathetic nervous system was activated. In addition, when planting transplants, and cutting and washing were performed at a high level of cognitive difficulty, and the standard deviation of the RR interval was high, indicating a high ability of the autonomic nervous system to resist stress. As a result of the SDM, the emotional state according to task difficulty was found to be more stable and relaxed than high cognitive difficulty, but a significant increase in comfort, relaxation, and naturalness was achieved when nine gardening tasks with low cognitive difficulty were performed, with the exception of sowing. The results of this study show that tasks with high cognitive difficulty activate working memory, whereas those with low cognitive difficulty stabilize and relax brain activation. Therefore, this study confirmed that an intervention in horticultural activities with an appropriate level of cognitive difficulty could have a significant effect on psychophysiological changes in adults.","PeriodicalId":13140,"journal":{"name":"Hortscience","volume":"364 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hortscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci17272-23","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HORTICULTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compared the effects of horticultural activities according to cognitive demand levels on psychophysiological responses in adults. Thirty-two adults in their 20s were included. Participants performed 10 horticultural activities (raking, planting transplants, fertilizing, tying plants to stakes, harvesting, sowing, conducting cuttage, planting potted plants, cutting and washing, arranging flowers) for 150 seconds at two levels of cognitive demand. Electroencephalographic (EEG) and electrocardiographic measurements were acquired during the activity. After each activity, the participants’ emotional states were evaluated using the semantic differential method (SDM). The EEG results, according to comparison by activity, showed that for nine activities, excluding raking, relative theta decreased when performing tasks at a level of high cognitive difficulty (HCD) compared with those with a low cognitive difficulty (LCD), and relative beta, relative gamma, fast alpha, and relative low beta increased, indicating activation of the prefrontal cortex. In the relative theta power spectra, the cuttage activity was found to be the lowest when performing tasks at a high level high cognitive difficulty, and the working memory function was activated the most compared with other activities. When sowing at a low level of cognitive demand, participants’ heart rate decreased and stabilized. When potted plants were harvested at a high level of cognitive difficulty, the ratio of low frequency to high frequency increased, and the sympathetic nervous system was activated. In addition, when planting transplants, and cutting and washing were performed at a high level of cognitive difficulty, and the standard deviation of the RR interval was high, indicating a high ability of the autonomic nervous system to resist stress. As a result of the SDM, the emotional state according to task difficulty was found to be more stable and relaxed than high cognitive difficulty, but a significant increase in comfort, relaxation, and naturalness was achieved when nine gardening tasks with low cognitive difficulty were performed, with the exception of sowing. The results of this study show that tasks with high cognitive difficulty activate working memory, whereas those with low cognitive difficulty stabilize and relax brain activation. Therefore, this study confirmed that an intervention in horticultural activities with an appropriate level of cognitive difficulty could have a significant effect on psychophysiological changes in adults.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同园艺活动认知需求水平对成人心理生理反应的影响
比较了不同认知需求水平的园艺活动对成人心理生理反应的影响。其中包括32名20多岁的成年人。在认知需求的两个层次上,参与者在150秒内完成了10项园艺活动(耙地、移栽、施肥、系木、收获、播种、扦插、盆栽、剪洗、插花)。在活动期间进行脑电图(EEG)和心电图测量。每个活动结束后,使用语义差分法(semantic differential method, SDM)评估被试的情绪状态。根据脑电活动对比结果显示,在9项活动中,除拉车外,高认知难度(HCD)任务比低认知难度(LCD)任务的相对θ降低,相对β、相对γ、快速α和相对低β增加,表明前额叶皮层激活。在相对θ功率谱中,在执行高水平、高认知难度任务时,切割活动最低,工作记忆功能被激活最多。当认知需求水平较低时,参与者的心率下降并趋于稳定。当盆栽植物在认知难度较高的情况下收获时,低频与高频的比例增加,交感神经系统被激活。此外,在种植移栽、修剪和清洗时,认知难度水平较高,RR区间标准差较高,表明自主神经系统抗应激能力较高。SDM结果发现,任务难度下的情绪状态比高认知难度下的情绪状态更稳定和放松,但在9个低认知难度的园艺任务中,除了播种任务外,舒适、放松和自然状态都显著增加。研究结果表明,高认知难度的任务激活了工作记忆,而低认知难度的任务则稳定和放松了大脑的激活。因此,本研究证实,在适当的认知困难水平下干预园艺活动可能对成人的心理生理变化有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hortscience
Hortscience 农林科学-园艺
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: HortScience publishes horticultural information of interest to a broad array of horticulturists. Its goals are to apprise horticultural scientists and others interested in horticulture of scientific and industry developments and of significant research, education, or extension findings or methods.
期刊最新文献
Traffic Tolerance of Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) Cultivars as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization Own-rooted Walnut Propagule of Four Walnut (Juglans) Rootstocks and Main Cultivated Cultivar Liaoning 1 Acquirement through Layering under Field Conditions Genetic Variability of Traffic Tolerance and Surface Playability of Bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) under Fall Simulated Traffic Stress Ning Qing 4: A New Holly Cultivar with Elliptic and Serrated Leaves ‘Ning Qing 2’: A New Dwarf Holly Cultivar with Small Serrated Leaves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1