Ultrasonic measurement for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome: A study in the Hong Kong Chinese population

Chung Pui Man, Chow Esther Ching-San
{"title":"Ultrasonic measurement for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome: A study in the Hong Kong Chinese population","authors":"Chung Pui Man, Chow Esther Ching-San","doi":"10.1177/22104917231197233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Ulnar nerve enlargement is observed in ultrasound (USG) in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). This study aims to compare the ultrasound size of the ulnar nerve between CuTS patients and control subjects, to find the cut off size for diagnosis, and to validate the use of USG as an adjunct in CuTS diagnosis. Materials and Methods: There were 23 elbows with clinical and nerve conduction test (NCT) confirmed CuTS, and 42 elbows in the control group. Cases with elbow deformities, old ulnar nerve injuries and postoperative cases were excluded. The ulnar nerve cross sectional area (CSA) was measured at 6 different levels and positions: over the medial epicondyle (ME) in elbow flexion/extension, 2 cm and 5 cm distal to the ME, 2 cm and 5 cm proximal to the ME. A cut off CSA value for CuTS diagnosis was derived. Correlation between ulnar nerve CSAs and NCT was analysed. Results: The age and gender distribution were similar in both groups (61.2 vs 56.6; M > F, p > 0.05). The mean CSA of the CuTS group vs control group was 19.2 mm2 vs 7.0 mm2, 19.5 mm2 vs 7.1 mm2, 20.8 mm2 vs 8.1 mm2 at ME flexion, ME extension and maximal CSA respectively. The derived CSA cut off value for CuTS at ME flexion, ME extension and maximal CSA were 10.5 mm2, 11.5 mm2, and 15 mm2 respectively. The CSA difference at different levels between the 2 groups were significant except at 5 cm proximal to ME. A strong negative correlation was seen between the CSA and the across elbow nerve conduction velocity, with correlation coefficient of −0.748 at ME flexion, −0.654 at ME extension and –0.676 at maximal CSA. Conclusion: USG can be used as an adjunct for the diagnosis of CuTS with high accuracy and patient safety. It can also be used to delineate possible anatomical etiologies at the cubital tunnel.","PeriodicalId":42408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":"24 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231197233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ulnar nerve enlargement is observed in ultrasound (USG) in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). This study aims to compare the ultrasound size of the ulnar nerve between CuTS patients and control subjects, to find the cut off size for diagnosis, and to validate the use of USG as an adjunct in CuTS diagnosis. Materials and Methods: There were 23 elbows with clinical and nerve conduction test (NCT) confirmed CuTS, and 42 elbows in the control group. Cases with elbow deformities, old ulnar nerve injuries and postoperative cases were excluded. The ulnar nerve cross sectional area (CSA) was measured at 6 different levels and positions: over the medial epicondyle (ME) in elbow flexion/extension, 2 cm and 5 cm distal to the ME, 2 cm and 5 cm proximal to the ME. A cut off CSA value for CuTS diagnosis was derived. Correlation between ulnar nerve CSAs and NCT was analysed. Results: The age and gender distribution were similar in both groups (61.2 vs 56.6; M > F, p > 0.05). The mean CSA of the CuTS group vs control group was 19.2 mm2 vs 7.0 mm2, 19.5 mm2 vs 7.1 mm2, 20.8 mm2 vs 8.1 mm2 at ME flexion, ME extension and maximal CSA respectively. The derived CSA cut off value for CuTS at ME flexion, ME extension and maximal CSA were 10.5 mm2, 11.5 mm2, and 15 mm2 respectively. The CSA difference at different levels between the 2 groups were significant except at 5 cm proximal to ME. A strong negative correlation was seen between the CSA and the across elbow nerve conduction velocity, with correlation coefficient of −0.748 at ME flexion, −0.654 at ME extension and –0.676 at maximal CSA. Conclusion: USG can be used as an adjunct for the diagnosis of CuTS with high accuracy and patient safety. It can also be used to delineate possible anatomical etiologies at the cubital tunnel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声测量诊断肘管综合征:香港华人的研究
摘要:肘管综合征(CuTS)患者在超声(USG)下可观察到尺神经扩张。本研究旨在比较CuTS患者与对照组尺神经的超声大小,寻找诊断的截断尺寸,验证USG在CuTS诊断中的辅助应用。材料与方法:临床及神经传导试验(NCT)证实有切口的肘关节23例,对照组42例。排除肘部畸形、陈旧性尺神经损伤及术后病例。测量尺神经横截面积(CSA)在6个不同的水平和位置:肘关节屈伸时内侧上髁(ME)上方,ME远端2 cm和5 cm, ME近端2 cm和5 cm。导出了诊断CuTS的截断CSA值。分析尺神经csa与NCT的相关性。结果:两组患者的年龄和性别分布相似(61.2 vs 56.6;米比;F, p >0.05)。在ME屈、ME伸和最大CSA时,CuTS组与对照组的平均CSA分别为19.2 mm2 vs 7.0 mm2、19.5 mm2 vs 7.1 mm2、20.8 mm2 vs 8.1 mm2。在ME屈曲、ME伸展和最大CSA处的cut off值分别为10.5 mm2、11.5 mm2和15 mm2。除ME近5 cm外,两组间不同水平CSA差异均有统计学意义。CSA与跨肘神经传导速度呈显著负相关,ME屈曲时相关系数为- 0.748,ME伸展时相关系数为- 0.654,最大CSA时相关系数为-0.676。结论:超声心动图可作为诊断切口的辅助手段,具有较高的准确性和患者安全性。它也可以用来描绘可能的肘管解剖病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasonic measurement for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome: A study in the Hong Kong Chinese population The surgical outcome of postoperative radial neck nonunion: Retrospective case series with systematic review Tip-to-apex distance does not predict fixation failure regardless of reduction quality in intra-capsular neck of femur fractures treated with femoral neck system Real world patient-reported and health care professional-perceived pain severity in outpatient fracture clinic procedures Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sports and arthroscopic surgery in local hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1