Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominal Plane Block on Postoperative Pain After Laparotomy Abdominal Surgery

Ali Akbar Nasiri, Sara Akhavan Salamat, Shahryar Sane
{"title":"Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominal Plane Block on Postoperative Pain After Laparotomy Abdominal Surgery","authors":"Ali Akbar Nasiri, Sara Akhavan Salamat, Shahryar Sane","doi":"10.34172/ddj.2023.502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is used to manage pain in patients undergoing laparotomy abdominal surgery. This study aimed to investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided TAP block on postoperative pain and complications in patients undergoing laparotomy abdominal surgery. Materials and Methods: In this randomized double-blinded prospective clinical trial, 64 patients undergoing laparotomy surgery were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and were randomly divided into two groups with 32 patients in each group. General anesthesia was induced in all patients. At the end of the surgery, a TAP block was performed under ultrasound guidance in the intervention group, and the control group received no intervention. The severity of pain was assessed 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery using visual analogue scale (VAS) criteria. Patients who scored their pain more than 4 on the VAS for pain relief received 25 mg of intravenous (IV) pethidine. Furthermore, potential complications, including nausea, vomiting, and dizziness were assessed and recorded in both groups. Results: Mean pain severity 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 18 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the TAP-block group than in the control group (P=0.001). The mean dose of pethidine received in TAP block patients was 28.90±19.16 and 60.93±14.11 in the control group, which showed a significant difference (P=0.001). Moreover, the mean time to the first dose of pethidine in patients in the TAP block group and the control group was 15.36±3.56 and 8.43±4.28 hours after surgery (P=0.001). In addition, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower in the TAP group than in the control group. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided TAP block can control post-laparotomy pain and reduce opioid use during hospitalization.","PeriodicalId":11143,"journal":{"name":"Disease and Diagnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disease and Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ddj.2023.502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is used to manage pain in patients undergoing laparotomy abdominal surgery. This study aimed to investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided TAP block on postoperative pain and complications in patients undergoing laparotomy abdominal surgery. Materials and Methods: In this randomized double-blinded prospective clinical trial, 64 patients undergoing laparotomy surgery were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and were randomly divided into two groups with 32 patients in each group. General anesthesia was induced in all patients. At the end of the surgery, a TAP block was performed under ultrasound guidance in the intervention group, and the control group received no intervention. The severity of pain was assessed 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery using visual analogue scale (VAS) criteria. Patients who scored their pain more than 4 on the VAS for pain relief received 25 mg of intravenous (IV) pethidine. Furthermore, potential complications, including nausea, vomiting, and dizziness were assessed and recorded in both groups. Results: Mean pain severity 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 18 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the TAP-block group than in the control group (P=0.001). The mean dose of pethidine received in TAP block patients was 28.90±19.16 and 60.93±14.11 in the control group, which showed a significant difference (P=0.001). Moreover, the mean time to the first dose of pethidine in patients in the TAP block group and the control group was 15.36±3.56 and 8.43±4.28 hours after surgery (P=0.001). In addition, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower in the TAP group than in the control group. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided TAP block can control post-laparotomy pain and reduce opioid use during hospitalization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下经腹平面阻滞对剖腹术后疼痛的影响
背景:腹横平面(TAP)阻滞用于控制剖腹手术患者的疼痛。本研究旨在探讨超声引导下TAP阻滞对剖腹手术患者术后疼痛及并发症的影响。材料与方法:本随机双盲前瞻性临床试验,根据纳入和排除标准,选择64例开腹手术患者,随机分为两组,每组32例。所有患者均行全身麻醉。手术结束时,干预组在超声引导下进行TAP阻滞,对照组不进行干预。术后2、6、12、18和24小时采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)标准评估疼痛严重程度。疼痛缓解VAS评分超过4分的患者接受25mg静脉注射(IV)哌替啶。此外,评估并记录两组患者的潜在并发症,包括恶心、呕吐和头晕。结果:tap阻断组术后2、4、6、12、18、18小时的平均疼痛严重程度显著低于对照组(P=0.001)。TAP阻滞组患者的哌替啶平均剂量为28.90±19.16,对照组为60.93±14.11,差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。TAP阻断组与对照组患者术后平均到第一次给药时间分别为15.36±3.56 h和8.43±4.28 h (P=0.001)。此外,TAP组恶心和呕吐的发生率低于对照组。结论:超声引导下TAP阻滞可控制剖腹术后疼痛,减少住院期间阿片类药物的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Eight Weeks of High-Intensity Interval Training with L-Cysteine Consumption on CRP and TNF-α in Heart Tissue of Young Rats with Type 2 Diabetes The Association of NKp46-Positive uNK Cells With a Higher Risk of Recurrent Miscarriage and IVF Failure Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominal Plane Block on Postoperative Pain After Laparotomy Abdominal Surgery An Overview of the Inborn Errors of Metabolism, Its Diagnosis, and Management Effect of the Aerobic and Resistance Training on Follistatin-Like 1 and Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Muscle Gene Expression in Rats Fed With a High-Fat Diet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1