A visual method for achieving stakeholder consensus on the specifics of change: a case study

IF 2.7 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Organizational Change Management Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1108/jocm-02-2023-0039
Masoom Suchdeo, Harshal Lowalekar, Durba Banerjee
{"title":"A visual method for achieving stakeholder consensus on the specifics of change: a case study","authors":"Masoom Suchdeo, Harshal Lowalekar, Durba Banerjee","doi":"10.1108/jocm-02-2023-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Different stakeholders frequently disagree on what the true problem is that must be solved and what specific actions must be taken during a change exercise. This article demonstrates a visual method for getting buy-in from stakeholders on the specifics of change using a systems thinking tool known as the current reality tree (CRT). Design/methodology/approach This study illustrates the use of a systems-thinking methodology to achieve consensus among stakeholders on “what is the real problem?” when envisioning a change. The authors illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach using a real-life case study in the context of contract catering. Findings The CRT enables diverse stakeholders to visualize the cause-and-effect relationships between various problems in a given system and assists them in identifying the set of actions that can address a large number of problems through the change program. Originality/value There is little discussion in the literature on change management of a systematic approach to get agreement from stakeholders regarding what the real problem is. This article demonstrates, by way of a case study, how change agents can not only determine which actions will have the greatest impact, but also garner the support of diverse stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":47958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Change Management","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Change Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-02-2023-0039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Different stakeholders frequently disagree on what the true problem is that must be solved and what specific actions must be taken during a change exercise. This article demonstrates a visual method for getting buy-in from stakeholders on the specifics of change using a systems thinking tool known as the current reality tree (CRT). Design/methodology/approach This study illustrates the use of a systems-thinking methodology to achieve consensus among stakeholders on “what is the real problem?” when envisioning a change. The authors illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach using a real-life case study in the context of contract catering. Findings The CRT enables diverse stakeholders to visualize the cause-and-effect relationships between various problems in a given system and assists them in identifying the set of actions that can address a large number of problems through the change program. Originality/value There is little discussion in the literature on change management of a systematic approach to get agreement from stakeholders regarding what the real problem is. This article demonstrates, by way of a case study, how change agents can not only determine which actions will have the greatest impact, but also garner the support of diverse stakeholders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在变更细节上达成涉众共识的可视化方法:案例研究
不同的涉众经常不同意必须解决的真正问题是什么,以及在变更实践中必须采取哪些具体的行动。本文演示了一种可视化的方法,使用称为当前现实树(CRT)的系统思考工具获得涉众对变更细节的支持。设计/方法/方法本研究说明了使用系统思维方法在利益相关者之间达成“真正的问题是什么?”的问题。作者用一个现实生活中的合同餐饮案例研究来说明所提出的方法的有效性。CRT使不同的利益相关者能够可视化给定系统中各种问题之间的因果关系,并帮助他们确定通过变革计划可以解决大量问题的一系列行动。关于变革管理的文献中很少有关于系统方法的讨论,以获得利益相关者关于真正问题所在的协议。本文通过案例研究的方式演示了变革代理人如何不仅可以确定哪些行动将产生最大的影响,而且还可以获得不同利益相关者的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: ■Adapting strategic planning to the need for change ■Leadership research ■Responsibility for change implementation and follow-through ■The psychology of change and its effect on the workforce ■TQM - will it work in your organization? Successful organizations respond intelligently to factors which precipitate change. Economic climates, political trends, changes in consumer demands, management policy or structure, employment levels and financial resources - all these elements are constantly at play to ensure that organizations clinging on to static structures will ultimately lose out. But change is a dynamic and alarming thing - this journal addresses how to manage it positively.
期刊最新文献
Developing and validating a scale for entrepreneurial marketing orientations: EMICO framework and its impact on business performance in startups School principals’ resistance to change: a multilevel analysis of individual factors and contextual conditions A systematic literature review on the network perspective and resource interaction: where are we now and where should we go? “I am served by a Robot!”: internal antecedents of customer acceptance of robotic hotel-service agents Unveiling organizational consciousness: a conceptual framework for nurturing thriving organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1