Analyzing Content and Information Quality of Instagram® Posts About #teethwhitening

Q3 Dentistry Cumhuriyet Dental Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.7126/cumudj.1262248
BULDUR, Mehmet , MİSİLLİ, Tuğba , AYAN, Gizem
{"title":"Analyzing Content and Information Quality of Instagram® Posts About #teethwhitening","authors":"BULDUR, Mehmet\n , MİSİLLİ, Tuğba\n , AYAN, Gizem\n ","doi":"10.7126/cumudj.1262248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives; Getting information on health issues from social media applications provides benefits to patients; however, different types of content can lead to the development of inappropriate norms. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the content and information quality of Instagram® posts about teeth whitening. Materials and Methods; The first 100 posts were included in the three search periods, which started in October 2022 and were carried out at two-week intervals. (n=300) The #teethwhitening hashtag, which was determined as a trend topic in each search period, was used. The content of the posts was analyzed over eight questions, whereas their general information quality was analyzed according to the modified DISCERN analysis on seven questions. The demographic data of the posts were evaluated in two parts: a) account and b) data of the post. The distribution of the user questions and other (#) hashtags mentioned in the posts were also analyzed. Results; 191 posts were excluded from the research. 42% (n=46) of the posts had “low” information content. In addition, the mean value of the content was 2.77 (min 0, max 8/n=109). The mean score in the modified DISCERN score was 11.83 (min 7, max 35/n=109). 53% (n= 57) of the posts were related either to prosthetic treatments alone or to combined treatments that included prosthetic procedures. Most of the posts mentioned the hashtag \"#veneer/s\". Questions such as cost, duration of treatment, and appointment procedures were also asked as comments under the posts. Conclusion; It can be stated that the content and information quality of Instagram® posts about #teethwhitening are insufficient and may direct patients to more interventional invasive treatment options.","PeriodicalId":10781,"journal":{"name":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","volume":"237 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1262248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives; Getting information on health issues from social media applications provides benefits to patients; however, different types of content can lead to the development of inappropriate norms. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the content and information quality of Instagram® posts about teeth whitening. Materials and Methods; The first 100 posts were included in the three search periods, which started in October 2022 and were carried out at two-week intervals. (n=300) The #teethwhitening hashtag, which was determined as a trend topic in each search period, was used. The content of the posts was analyzed over eight questions, whereas their general information quality was analyzed according to the modified DISCERN analysis on seven questions. The demographic data of the posts were evaluated in two parts: a) account and b) data of the post. The distribution of the user questions and other (#) hashtags mentioned in the posts were also analyzed. Results; 191 posts were excluded from the research. 42% (n=46) of the posts had “low” information content. In addition, the mean value of the content was 2.77 (min 0, max 8/n=109). The mean score in the modified DISCERN score was 11.83 (min 7, max 35/n=109). 53% (n= 57) of the posts were related either to prosthetic treatments alone or to combined treatments that included prosthetic procedures. Most of the posts mentioned the hashtag "#veneer/s". Questions such as cost, duration of treatment, and appointment procedures were also asked as comments under the posts. Conclusion; It can be stated that the content and information quality of Instagram® posts about #teethwhitening are insufficient and may direct patients to more interventional invasive treatment options.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析Instagram®关于# teeth美白的帖子的内容和信息质量
目标;从社交媒体应用程序获取有关健康问题的信息对患者有益;然而,不同类型的内容可能导致不适当规范的发展。因此,本研究旨在评估Instagram®有关牙齿美白的帖子的内容和信息质量。材料与方法;前100个职位包括在三个搜索期间,从2022年10月开始,每隔两周进行一次。(n=300)使用#牙齿美白标签,该标签被确定为每个搜索周期的趋势话题。对8个问题进行了内容分析,对7个问题进行了修改后的DISCERN分析,分析了总体信息质量。员额的人口统计数据分为两部分进行评估:a)帐户和b)员额数据。我们也分析了用户问题的分布,以及帖子中提到的其他(#)标签。结果;191个职位被排除在研究之外。42% (n=46)的帖子信息含量“低”。平均值为2.77(最小值为0,最大8/n=109)。修正后的DISCERN评分的平均得分为11.83(最小7分,最大35分/n=109)。53% (n= 57)的帖子与单独的假体治疗或包括假体手术的联合治疗有关。大多数帖子都提到了“#单板/s”的标签。诸如费用、治疗时间和预约程序等问题也被作为帖子下的评论询问。结论;可以说,Instagram®关于#牙齿美白的帖子内容和信息质量不足,可能会引导患者选择更多的介入侵入性治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Home and Over-The-Counter Whitening Agents on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of High Aesthetic Composites Çocukların Ağız Alışkanlıklarına İlişkin Ebeveyn Farkındalık ve Bilgi Düzeyinin Değerlendirilmesi: Bir Anket Çalışması İmplant destekli sabit bölümlü protez tedavisi yapılan hastalarında yaşam kalitesi ve memnuniyetinin değerlendirilmesi Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Healing of Periapical Lesions Using MTA or Conventional Filling Materials: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Effect of Music Therapy on Dental Anxiety in Periodontal Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1