Towards a post-imperial and Global IR?: Revisiting Khatami’s Dialogue among Civilisations

IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Review of International Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1017/s0260210523000621
Shabnam Holliday, Edward Wastnidge
{"title":"Towards a post-imperial and Global IR?: Revisiting Khatami’s Dialogue among Civilisations","authors":"Shabnam Holliday, Edward Wastnidge","doi":"10.1017/s0260210523000621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article argues that Dialogue among Civilisations can be put forward as a crucial contribution to debates addressing IR’s Eurocentrism. It highlights the blurring of West/non-West, domestic/international, and imperial/post-imperial bifurcations. This is evident in three ways. First, Dialogue among Civilisations needs to be appreciated in Iran’s wider historical context and its multifaceted intellectual heritages. This demonstrates that the idea of the West as distinctly different from the East is problematic because of engagement between Iran and the so-called West. Second, Khatami’s intellectual endeavours are based on a simultaneous engagement with Western political thought, Islamic philosophy, and the idea of Ancient Iran. Finally, the notion itself reflects an internal dialogue whereby Western civilisation along with Islam and Iran’s pre-Islamic heritages are considered integral to Iranian political culture. Furthermore, it is an aspiration for how post-colonial Muslim societies can engage with colonial power while maintaining a post-colonial authenticity. Our contention is that an in-depth understanding of Iran alongside a revisiting of Khatami’s Dialogue among Civilisations can act as a means of bringing the perspective of the ‘other’ into debates on the international and our epistemological and ontological understanding of the West.","PeriodicalId":48017,"journal":{"name":"Review of International Studies","volume":"102 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210523000621","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article argues that Dialogue among Civilisations can be put forward as a crucial contribution to debates addressing IR’s Eurocentrism. It highlights the blurring of West/non-West, domestic/international, and imperial/post-imperial bifurcations. This is evident in three ways. First, Dialogue among Civilisations needs to be appreciated in Iran’s wider historical context and its multifaceted intellectual heritages. This demonstrates that the idea of the West as distinctly different from the East is problematic because of engagement between Iran and the so-called West. Second, Khatami’s intellectual endeavours are based on a simultaneous engagement with Western political thought, Islamic philosophy, and the idea of Ancient Iran. Finally, the notion itself reflects an internal dialogue whereby Western civilisation along with Islam and Iran’s pre-Islamic heritages are considered integral to Iranian political culture. Furthermore, it is an aspiration for how post-colonial Muslim societies can engage with colonial power while maintaining a post-colonial authenticity. Our contention is that an in-depth understanding of Iran alongside a revisiting of Khatami’s Dialogue among Civilisations can act as a means of bringing the perspective of the ‘other’ into debates on the international and our epistemological and ontological understanding of the West.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向后帝国时代和全球国际关系?:重新审视哈塔米的《文明对话》
本文认为,文明之间的对话可以作为解决国际关系欧洲中心主义辩论的重要贡献。它突出了西方/非西方,国内/国际,帝国/后帝国的分歧的模糊。这在三个方面是显而易见的。首先,文明对话需要在伊朗更广泛的历史背景和其多方面的知识遗产中得到重视。这表明,由于伊朗与所谓的西方之间的接触,西方与东方截然不同的想法是有问题的。其次,哈塔米的学术努力是建立在与西方政治思想、伊斯兰哲学和古伊朗思想同时接触的基础上的。最后,这个概念本身反映了一种内部对话,在这种对话中,西方文明以及伊斯兰教和伊朗前伊斯兰教遗产被认为是伊朗政治文化不可或缺的一部分。此外,这是一个关于后殖民穆斯林社会如何在保持后殖民真实性的同时与殖民权力接触的愿望。我们的观点是,对伊朗的深入理解,以及对哈塔米的《文明之间的对话》的重新审视,可以作为一种手段,将“他者”的视角带入国际辩论,以及我们对西方的认识论和本体论理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of International Studies
Review of International Studies INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Review of International Studies serves the needs of scholars in international relations and related fields such as politics, history, law, and sociology. The Review publishes a significant number of high quality research articles, review articles which survey new contributions to the field, a forum section to accommodate debates and replies, and occasional interviews with leading scholars.
期刊最新文献
Exposing linguistic imperialism: Why global IR has to be multilingual Un-suturing Westphalian IR via non-Western literature: A Grey Man (1963) RIS volume 50 issue 1 Cover and Front matter RIS volume 50 issue 1 Cover and Back matter Cosmologies of conquest: The Renaissance foundations of modern international thought
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1