Electronic health record–based identification of inpatients receiving antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia

David Yang, Leigh Cressman, Keith Hamilton, Lauren Dutcher
{"title":"Electronic health record–based identification of inpatients receiving antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia","authors":"David Yang, Leigh Cressman, Keith Hamilton, Lauren Dutcher","doi":"10.1017/ash.2023.253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Inappropriate antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is common. Although antibiotic stewardship activities require real-time, accurate identification of patients being treated for CAP, there are few reliable methods to identify such patients using the electronic health record (EHR). We conducted a retrospective study to assess the performance of provider-selected antibiotic indication in identifying patients being treated for CAP among a cohort of hospitalized adults. Methods: We randomly selected 440 patients from a cohort of patients who received at least 1 systemic antibiotic within 48 hours of admission between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, at 3 acute-care hospitals. The reference standard for treatment of CAP was defined as intention to treat for pneumonia by inpatient provider(s) within 48 hours of admission, as assessed by chart review of provider notes. Treatment for pneumonia using any terminology except with “hospital-acquired pneumonia” (HAP) or “ventilator-associated pneumonia” (VAP) were counted. Provider-selected indication of CAP (in an antibiotic order) was compared against this reference standard; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Performance characteristics of International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for pneumonia in identifying CAP patients were assessed against the same reference standard. A secondary analysis including terms HAP and VAP in the reference standard was performed. Results: Provider-selected antibiotic indication for CAP had a sensitivity of 64.4%, specificity of 96.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 73.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.1%, giving comparable performance to ICD-10 codes (Table 1). Of those with 21 false-negative results, 13 (61.9%) had a healthcare-associated lower respiratory tract infection and 14 (66.7%) had sepsis indicated in at least 1 antibiotic order. Conclusions: Provider-selected antibiotic indication showed moderate sensitivity and high specificity for identifying CAP-treated cases. Importantly, use of this method can be deployed for real-time antibiotic stewardship interventions for CAP. Disclosures: None","PeriodicalId":7953,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inappropriate antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is common. Although antibiotic stewardship activities require real-time, accurate identification of patients being treated for CAP, there are few reliable methods to identify such patients using the electronic health record (EHR). We conducted a retrospective study to assess the performance of provider-selected antibiotic indication in identifying patients being treated for CAP among a cohort of hospitalized adults. Methods: We randomly selected 440 patients from a cohort of patients who received at least 1 systemic antibiotic within 48 hours of admission between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, at 3 acute-care hospitals. The reference standard for treatment of CAP was defined as intention to treat for pneumonia by inpatient provider(s) within 48 hours of admission, as assessed by chart review of provider notes. Treatment for pneumonia using any terminology except with “hospital-acquired pneumonia” (HAP) or “ventilator-associated pneumonia” (VAP) were counted. Provider-selected indication of CAP (in an antibiotic order) was compared against this reference standard; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Performance characteristics of International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for pneumonia in identifying CAP patients were assessed against the same reference standard. A secondary analysis including terms HAP and VAP in the reference standard was performed. Results: Provider-selected antibiotic indication for CAP had a sensitivity of 64.4%, specificity of 96.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 73.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.1%, giving comparable performance to ICD-10 codes (Table 1). Of those with 21 false-negative results, 13 (61.9%) had a healthcare-associated lower respiratory tract infection and 14 (66.7%) had sepsis indicated in at least 1 antibiotic order. Conclusions: Provider-selected antibiotic indication showed moderate sensitivity and high specificity for identifying CAP-treated cases. Importantly, use of this method can be deployed for real-time antibiotic stewardship interventions for CAP. Disclosures: None
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于电子健康记录的社区获得性肺炎住院患者抗生素治疗识别
背景:社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的不适当抗生素使用是常见的。尽管抗生素管理活动需要实时、准确地识别正在接受CAP治疗的患者,但使用电子健康记录(EHR)识别此类患者的可靠方法很少。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估在一组住院成人中,提供者选择的抗生素指征在确定接受CAP治疗的患者中的表现。方法:我们从2019年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间入院48小时内至少接受过1种全身性抗生素治疗的患者队列中随机选择440例患者,这些患者来自3家急症医院。CAP治疗的参考标准被定义为住院医生在入院48小时内治疗肺炎的意向,通过对医生说明的图表审查进行评估。除“医院获得性肺炎”(HAP)或“呼吸机相关性肺炎”(VAP)外的任何术语的肺炎治疗均被计算在内。将供应商选择的CAP指征(在抗生素订单中)与本参考标准进行比较;计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。根据相同的参考标准评估国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)肺炎代码在识别CAP患者中的表现特征。进行二次分析,包括参考标准中的HAP和VAP。结果:CAP的提供者选择的抗生素指征的敏感性为64.4%,特异性为96.3%,阳性预测值(PPV)为73.1%,阴性预测值(NPV)为96.1%,与ICD-10代码具有相当的性能(表1)。在21个假阴性结果中,13个(61.9%)有医疗保健相关的下呼吸道感染,14个(66.7%)有败血症至少有一个抗生素指示。结论:提供者选择的抗生素指征对cap治疗的病例具有中等敏感性和高特异性。重要的是,使用这种方法可以用于CAP的实时抗生素管理干预。披露:无
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using whole genome sequencing to characterize Clostridioides difficile isolates at a tertiary center in Melbourne, Australia Influenza outbreak management tabletop exercise for congregate living settings Bring it on again: antimicrobial stewardship in transplant infectious diseases: updates and new challenges Professor Mahmood Bhutta on disrupting unhealthy supply chains and promoting environmental sustainability in health care Oral amoxicillin challenges for low-risk penicillin-allergic patients at a large Veterans Affairs facility: a retrospective feasibility analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1