Characterizing healthcare worker attitudes toward the bivalent COVID-19 booster

Kathryn Willebrand, Jacqueline Fredrick, Lauren Pischel, Kavin Patel, Scott Roberts, Thomas Murray, Richard Martinello
{"title":"Characterizing healthcare worker attitudes toward the bivalent COVID-19 booster","authors":"Kathryn Willebrand, Jacqueline Fredrick, Lauren Pischel, Kavin Patel, Scott Roberts, Thomas Murray, Richard Martinello","doi":"10.1017/ash.2023.300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recent evidence has shown that the updated COVID-19 bivalent booster is effective in preventing COVID-19 compared with no previous vaccination and prior monovalent vaccination. Despite its effectiveness, uptake has been poor, and a minority of eligible recipients have received the booster. Understanding healthcare worker (HCW) attitudes for and against voluntary uptake of the bivalent booster dose against COVID-19 can help guide communication strategy to maximize uptake. In this survey study, we investigated attitudes toward updated and/or bivalent booster uptake in a behavioral health hospital shortly after a COVID-19 outbreak. Methods: A survey tool was developed and sent to all HCWs at the Yale New Haven Psychiatric Hospital in December 2022. The survey queried demographic data, job category, history of COVID-19, prior COVID-19 vaccinations, perception of COVID-19 exposure, and updated and/or bivalent booster doses. The survey was administered several weeks after a COVID-19 outbreak on multiple inpatient behavioral health units. Receipt of the COVID-19 primary vaccination series and the first booster dose were mandated for HCWs; however, receipt of the bivalent booster was voluntary. Results: The survey was sent to 664 HCWs with primary assignments in behavioral health settings. In total, 182 (27.4%) provided complete responses to the survey and are included in these data. Moreover, 91 HCWs (50.0%) reported previously having COVID-19 at least once. Overall, 100 HCWs (55.0%) received the bivalent booster. The most identified reasons for receiving the bivalent booster were wanting to protect family and friends (n = 113), importance of staying healthy (n = 112), and protecting colleagues and patients (n = 103). The most identified reasons for not wanting to receive the bivalent booster dose were not thinking it provides additional protection (n = 33), “too many” shots already received (n = 31), and concern about side effects (n = 30). Discussion: Bivalent booster dose uptake in HCWs on behavioral health units shortly after a COVID-19 outbreak was greater than the general population. HCWs reported varying reasons for and against receipt of the bivalent booster dose, with the most common being protection of family and friends and perceptions of no additional protection, respectively. A limitation of this study was voluntary response bias, in which results are biased toward individuals more likely to receive a bivalent booster vaccine. It is unclear whether reasons for declining the vaccine are representative of HCWs who did not complete the survey. Assessing attitudes for the bivalent booster dose can assist in guiding communication and outreach strategies to increase vaccine uptake by HCWs. Disclosures: None","PeriodicalId":7953,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent evidence has shown that the updated COVID-19 bivalent booster is effective in preventing COVID-19 compared with no previous vaccination and prior monovalent vaccination. Despite its effectiveness, uptake has been poor, and a minority of eligible recipients have received the booster. Understanding healthcare worker (HCW) attitudes for and against voluntary uptake of the bivalent booster dose against COVID-19 can help guide communication strategy to maximize uptake. In this survey study, we investigated attitudes toward updated and/or bivalent booster uptake in a behavioral health hospital shortly after a COVID-19 outbreak. Methods: A survey tool was developed and sent to all HCWs at the Yale New Haven Psychiatric Hospital in December 2022. The survey queried demographic data, job category, history of COVID-19, prior COVID-19 vaccinations, perception of COVID-19 exposure, and updated and/or bivalent booster doses. The survey was administered several weeks after a COVID-19 outbreak on multiple inpatient behavioral health units. Receipt of the COVID-19 primary vaccination series and the first booster dose were mandated for HCWs; however, receipt of the bivalent booster was voluntary. Results: The survey was sent to 664 HCWs with primary assignments in behavioral health settings. In total, 182 (27.4%) provided complete responses to the survey and are included in these data. Moreover, 91 HCWs (50.0%) reported previously having COVID-19 at least once. Overall, 100 HCWs (55.0%) received the bivalent booster. The most identified reasons for receiving the bivalent booster were wanting to protect family and friends (n = 113), importance of staying healthy (n = 112), and protecting colleagues and patients (n = 103). The most identified reasons for not wanting to receive the bivalent booster dose were not thinking it provides additional protection (n = 33), “too many” shots already received (n = 31), and concern about side effects (n = 30). Discussion: Bivalent booster dose uptake in HCWs on behavioral health units shortly after a COVID-19 outbreak was greater than the general population. HCWs reported varying reasons for and against receipt of the bivalent booster dose, with the most common being protection of family and friends and perceptions of no additional protection, respectively. A limitation of this study was voluntary response bias, in which results are biased toward individuals more likely to receive a bivalent booster vaccine. It is unclear whether reasons for declining the vaccine are representative of HCWs who did not complete the survey. Assessing attitudes for the bivalent booster dose can assist in guiding communication and outreach strategies to increase vaccine uptake by HCWs. Disclosures: None
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生保健工作者对二价COVID-19增强剂态度的特征
背景:最近的证据表明,与之前未接种疫苗和之前接种过单价疫苗相比,更新后的COVID-19二价增强疫苗可有效预防COVID-19。尽管它有效,但使用率很低,少数符合条件的接受者已经接种了加强剂。了解卫生保健工作者对自愿接种COVID-19二价加强剂的态度和反对态度有助于指导宣传策略,以最大限度地提高接种效果。在这项调查研究中,我们调查了行为健康医院在COVID-19爆发后不久对更新和/或二价增强剂摄取的态度。方法:开发一种调查工具,并于2022年12月向耶鲁大学纽黑文精神病院的所有HCWs发送调查工具。该调查询问了人口统计数据、工作类别、COVID-19史、之前的COVID-19疫苗接种、对COVID-19暴露的认知以及更新和/或二价加强剂量。这项调查是在多个住院行为健康单位爆发COVID-19疫情几周后进行的。卫生保健工作者必须接种COVID-19初级疫苗系列和第一剂加强疫苗;然而,接受二价增强剂是自愿的。结果:该调查被发送给664名主要在行为卫生机构工作的卫生保健工作者。共有182家(27.4%)对调查提供了完整的答复,并纳入了这些数据。此外,91名医护人员(50.0%)报告曾至少感染过一次COVID-19。总体而言,100名HCWs(55.0%)接受了二价增强剂。最明确的接受二价增强疫苗的原因是希望保护家人和朋友(n = 113),保持健康的重要性(n = 112),以及保护同事和患者(n = 103)。不想接种二价加强剂的最明确原因是认为它不能提供额外的保护(n = 33),“太多”已经接种(n = 31),以及担心副作用(n = 30)。讨论:在COVID-19爆发后不久,行为卫生单位的卫生保健工作者的双价加强剂摄入量大于一般人群。卫生保健工作者报告了支持和反对接受二价加强剂的各种原因,最常见的分别是为了保护家人和朋友,以及认为没有额外的保护。本研究的一个局限性是自愿反应偏倚,其中结果偏向于更有可能接受二价加强疫苗的个体。目前尚不清楚拒绝接种疫苗的原因是否代表未完成调查的卫生保健工作者。评估对二价加强剂的态度有助于指导沟通和推广战略,以增加卫生保健工作者对疫苗的吸收。披露:没有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using whole genome sequencing to characterize Clostridioides difficile isolates at a tertiary center in Melbourne, Australia Influenza outbreak management tabletop exercise for congregate living settings Bring it on again: antimicrobial stewardship in transplant infectious diseases: updates and new challenges Professor Mahmood Bhutta on disrupting unhealthy supply chains and promoting environmental sustainability in health care Oral amoxicillin challenges for low-risk penicillin-allergic patients at a large Veterans Affairs facility: a retrospective feasibility analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1