Inpatient pediatric antimicrobial use for respiratory infections during the RSV surge

Aaron Hunt, Rodrigo Burgos, Alfredo Mena Lora
{"title":"Inpatient pediatric antimicrobial use for respiratory infections during the RSV surge","authors":"Aaron Hunt, Rodrigo Burgos, Alfredo Mena Lora","doi":"10.1017/ash.2023.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In the United States, pneumonia causes >100,000 pediatric hospitalizations annually. On November 4, 2022, the CDC issued a Heath Advisory concerning an upcoming surge of respiratory illnesses including SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Differentiating between viral and bacterial causes is challenging and can lead to antimicrobial overuse. Currently, tools are being developed to distinguish between viral and bacterial pneumonia. The VALS-DANCE Pneumonia Etiology Predictor (PEP) provides clinical scoring criteria (Fig. 1) to determine probable cause of pneumonia with 93.1% sensitivity for bacterial pneumonia. Scores >11 have a >25% likelihood of having bacterial etiology. Given that antimicrobial exposure increases resistance rates, disrupts natural flora, and increases the risk of side effects, a core goal of researchers is to develop ways to promote stewardship and reduce inappropriate use. We assessed the patterns of use for antimicrobials in pediatric patients admitted with pneumonia at our institution. Methods: This retrospective review included pediatric cases admitted to an urban safety-net community hospital from July 22, 2022, to December 16, 2022. A daily list of all patients receiving antimicrobials was reviewed, and pediatric patients with diagnosis of a respiratory infection were included. Patients with additional indications for antimicrobial therapy, diagnosis of bronchitis, incomplete records, or without complete information were excluded from the scoring criteria. The primary objective was to assess the appropriateness of antimicrobial use for pneumonia, defined as use consistent with PEP scoring recommendations. Results: Of 53 patients reviewed, 37 met inclusion criteria. Of 37 patients, 22 (59.5%) met study criteria for appropriate therapy. The 15 patients (40.5%) who were inappropriate for treatment received an average of 4.67 ± 1.91 days of antibiotics. Of these 15 patients, 11 (73.3%) also had a positive viral test, further increasing the likelihood of a viral etiology. This subgroup had an average antibiotic exposure of 4.27 ± 1.79 days. Documented rationale for therapy included severity of illness (4 of 11), radiograph consolidation (4 of 11), and provider disagreement with radiograph interpretation (3 of 11). Conclusions: Pediatric respiratory infections represent a significant opportunity for antimicrobial stewardship. In this study, as many as 40% of pediatric patients may have received unnecessary antibiotic exposure. Use of the VALS-DANCE criteria may help clinicians identify patients with low likelihood of bacterial infection and reduce antimicrobial use. The national surge of viral infections serves to highlight the vital importance of appropriate diagnostic stewardship. Disclosure: None","PeriodicalId":7953,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the United States, pneumonia causes >100,000 pediatric hospitalizations annually. On November 4, 2022, the CDC issued a Heath Advisory concerning an upcoming surge of respiratory illnesses including SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Differentiating between viral and bacterial causes is challenging and can lead to antimicrobial overuse. Currently, tools are being developed to distinguish between viral and bacterial pneumonia. The VALS-DANCE Pneumonia Etiology Predictor (PEP) provides clinical scoring criteria (Fig. 1) to determine probable cause of pneumonia with 93.1% sensitivity for bacterial pneumonia. Scores >11 have a >25% likelihood of having bacterial etiology. Given that antimicrobial exposure increases resistance rates, disrupts natural flora, and increases the risk of side effects, a core goal of researchers is to develop ways to promote stewardship and reduce inappropriate use. We assessed the patterns of use for antimicrobials in pediatric patients admitted with pneumonia at our institution. Methods: This retrospective review included pediatric cases admitted to an urban safety-net community hospital from July 22, 2022, to December 16, 2022. A daily list of all patients receiving antimicrobials was reviewed, and pediatric patients with diagnosis of a respiratory infection were included. Patients with additional indications for antimicrobial therapy, diagnosis of bronchitis, incomplete records, or without complete information were excluded from the scoring criteria. The primary objective was to assess the appropriateness of antimicrobial use for pneumonia, defined as use consistent with PEP scoring recommendations. Results: Of 53 patients reviewed, 37 met inclusion criteria. Of 37 patients, 22 (59.5%) met study criteria for appropriate therapy. The 15 patients (40.5%) who were inappropriate for treatment received an average of 4.67 ± 1.91 days of antibiotics. Of these 15 patients, 11 (73.3%) also had a positive viral test, further increasing the likelihood of a viral etiology. This subgroup had an average antibiotic exposure of 4.27 ± 1.79 days. Documented rationale for therapy included severity of illness (4 of 11), radiograph consolidation (4 of 11), and provider disagreement with radiograph interpretation (3 of 11). Conclusions: Pediatric respiratory infections represent a significant opportunity for antimicrobial stewardship. In this study, as many as 40% of pediatric patients may have received unnecessary antibiotic exposure. Use of the VALS-DANCE criteria may help clinicians identify patients with low likelihood of bacterial infection and reduce antimicrobial use. The national surge of viral infections serves to highlight the vital importance of appropriate diagnostic stewardship. Disclosure: None
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在呼吸道合胞病毒激增期间,儿科住院患者使用抗微生物药物治疗呼吸道感染
背景:在美国,每年有10万儿童因肺炎住院。2022年11月4日,美国疾病控制与预防中心发布了一份健康咨询,涉及即将到来的呼吸道疾病激增,包括SARS-CoV-2、流感和呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)。区分病毒和细菌原因具有挑战性,并可能导致抗生素的过度使用。目前,正在开发区分病毒性肺炎和细菌性肺炎的工具。VALS-DANCE肺炎病原学预测器(PEP)提供临床评分标准(图1)来确定肺炎的可能原因,对细菌性肺炎的敏感性为93.1%。得分为11分的患者有25%的可能性是细菌性病因。鉴于抗菌素暴露会增加耐药率、破坏自然菌群并增加副作用的风险,研究人员的一个核心目标是开发促进管理和减少不当使用的方法。我们评估了在我院住院的肺炎患儿抗菌药物的使用模式。方法:本回顾性研究包括2022年7月22日至2022年12月16日在某城市安全网社区医院住院的儿科病例。审查了所有接受抗微生物药物治疗的患者的每日清单,并包括诊断为呼吸道感染的儿科患者。有其他抗菌素治疗适应症、诊断为支气管炎、记录不完整或信息不完整的患者被排除在评分标准之外。主要目的是评估肺炎使用抗菌药物的适宜性,定义为使用与PEP评分建议一致。结果:53例患者中,37例符合纳入标准。37例患者中,22例(59.5%)符合适当治疗的研究标准。不适宜治疗的15例(40.5%)患者平均使用抗生素时间为4.67±1.91 d。在这15例患者中,11例(73.3%)也有病毒检测阳性,进一步增加了病毒病因的可能性。该亚组平均抗生素暴露时间为4.27±1.79天。文献记载的治疗理由包括疾病严重程度(11例中有4例)、x线片巩固(11例中有4例)和提供者不同意x线片解释(11例中有3例)。结论:儿童呼吸道感染是抗菌药物管理的重要机会。在这项研究中,多达40%的儿科患者可能接受了不必要的抗生素接触。使用VALS-DANCE标准可以帮助临床医生识别低可能性细菌感染的患者并减少抗菌药物的使用。全国病毒感染的激增凸显了适当诊断管理的至关重要性。披露:没有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using whole genome sequencing to characterize Clostridioides difficile isolates at a tertiary center in Melbourne, Australia Influenza outbreak management tabletop exercise for congregate living settings Bring it on again: antimicrobial stewardship in transplant infectious diseases: updates and new challenges Professor Mahmood Bhutta on disrupting unhealthy supply chains and promoting environmental sustainability in health care Oral amoxicillin challenges for low-risk penicillin-allergic patients at a large Veterans Affairs facility: a retrospective feasibility analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1